Sentences with phrase «scientists on each side of»

In the 1930s, the rise of Nazi Germany and the threat of war provided a stimulus for scientists on both sides of the conflict to turn Albert Einstein's famous E = MC2 theory into a destructive reality.

Both Creationists and Evolutionists use the same basic scientific method, which means there are great scientists on both sides of the fence.

The principal secretary of the USSR Academy of Sciences expressed the view that scientists on both sides of the Atlantic had reached a consensus and were unified in their view that nuclear war would spell disaster for the world.

Scientists on both sides of the Atlantic are researching a little - known cereal that could be used in breads for people with gluten intolerance.

And scientists on both sides of the Atlantic are currently focusing on the kernels of food - grade sorghum, aiming to bring this gluten - free grain, little used in food formulations - into mainstream foods products such as breads, biscuits, pizza crusts and noodles.

But as the research in Yaniv's lab progressed, it became clear that scientists on both sides of the argument had been right: Lymphatic cells do indeed grow from veins, but they originate from a niche within the vein that harbors angioblasts.

As Chairman of the Science, Space, and Technology Committee I have had the opportunity to hear from widely respected scientists on all sides of this question.

And scientists on both sides of the connection have already started using it to learn more about their respective fields.

The two representatives refer to a controversy over the use of CT scans to detect lung cancer in which scientists on both sides of a debate about the usefulness of this technology were accused of having conflicts of interest.

For all their disagreements, scientists on both sides of the fracking debate agree that it is very unlikely that microfracturing of rock formation itself contributes to the vertical migration of gases.

That's a difficult question to answer because I've talked to scientists on both sides of the fence, especially at the University of Alabama at Huntsville.

The physics behind this impact - volcano combo is not firm, say scientists on both sides of the debate.

Within the first 100 days of office, get the top five SCIENTISTS on both sides of the issue in front of you in the oval office and let them argue it out.

Scientists on both sides of the argument ought to put more emphasis on adequate preparations for possible changes whatever they might be rather then on the mostly futile attempt to convince one another and the public.

The fact is, many scientists on both sides of the debate are not climate scientists, they are earth scientists, astrophysicists, palaeontologists, economists, statisticians, and here in Australia, one of the most vocal pro-AGW commentators is a professor of psychology.

When a batch of climate scientists on all sides of the hurricane - climate question issued a letter warning that the main issue related to hurricanes is coastal vulnerability, not climate change, I wrote about it, but hardly anyone else did.

Scientists on both sides of the climate debate have been critical of Karl's paper and the adjustments made to temperature in the new data set, particularly the ocean data analysis.

This senseless name calling of the scientists on both sides of the political fence, and infighting over the details of the amount of the sensitivity of the climate will soon come to an end, as the experiment on the Earth is continued with out any possible controls by the IPCC policy makers, who only want it to proceed as is, with ADDITIONAL FUNDS taken from taxes paid by the developed world, to hasten to transfer of wealth to the third world, while weakening the Western government systems through self imposed bankruptcy.

I'm confident that, when we come to court, there'll be at least as many eminent scientists on my side of the witness list as on Michael E Mann's.

Whenever activist scientists on either side of a issue are involved, remember Feynman's «Cargo Cult Science»: «The first principle is that you must not fool yourself — and you are the easiest person to fool.

When there are hundreds of scientists on each side of an issue and you are not a scientist then the only rational side to take is agnostic.

You've made yourself look foolish again here by trying to overturn a basic, well - documented and noncontroversial physical fact (the absorption spectrum of carbon dioxide) accepted by scientists on both sides of this debate.

(I suppose my comment could also apply to Lindzen, Spencer, and Christy's comments outside the peer - reviewed venue where I do think they have said some unfortunate things, but that wasn't the primary issue... and, as you noted, scientists on both sides of the debate sometimes make questionable statements in the public realm.)

This assessment has nothing to do with my knowledge of physics, statistics, etc., or lack of same, but represents the widely accepted consensus among climate scientists on both sides of the fence.

Not exact matches

On one side are the Regents of the University of California and the University of Vienna (representing scientists Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier, respectively); on the other is the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard University (representing Feng ZhangOn one side are the Regents of the University of California and the University of Vienna (representing scientists Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier, respectively); on the other is the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard University (representing Feng Zhangon the other is the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard University (representing Feng Zhang).

Scientists have often talked about «the butterfly effect» wherein it is entirely possible that a single flap of a butterfly a thousand years ago on the other side of the world sparked off a chain of events that ultimately and eventually led to an F5 tornado ripping through Moore, Oklahoma.

The difficulty was, that to say so, even for a scientist with the factsat his fingertips, was to go against a powerful and intolerant conventional wisdom: «We liberals», he wrote, «who work in the fields of global HIV / AIDS and family planning take terrible professional risks if we side with the pope on a divisive topic such as this.

In his wide - ranging address, Archbishop Ravasi insisted that the conference planned was to promote an increased understanding between scientists and theologians: he used an image of those working «at the frontier» on either side being given a better view of the other side.

I can't prove God's existence just as much as scientist can't prove the big bang... there is evidence of both but to reach a conclusion takes faith... one side leaves hope and the other does not... maybe I'm agnostic too because I don't claim to know everything about why I'm here, I have to have faith... Honestly, I'm sick of the extremes on both sides... the conservative judgmental Christian, who never thought through things as to why the believe what they do (ie Dinosaurs, cavemen, evolution, etc.) and the intellectually arrogant atheist and humanists.

Scientists always get excited about seeing new stars being born on the other side of the galaxy.

Amen.The thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it on a human logic level, for me.You may disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.

If someone has a Phd in Physics and works in advertising (with no science on the side as a hobby), is he more of a scientist than a lawyer who does amature astronomy full time after retiring?

The number of scientists and clinicians who have called over the last several years for more accurate reporting by the media on concussions and CTE, criticized the reporting of strongly presented causal assumptions relating to concussive and subconcussive brain impact exposure as «scientifically premature,» and highlighted the negative real world consequences to such one - sided reporting, has grown to consensus proportions, but have largely flown beneath the media's radar.

Third, acknowledging that some of the blame for the biased and one - sided media reporting on head injuries rests with some members of the scientific community who issue one - sided press releases and feed cherry - picked results about their findings to selected members of the media, the authors look to a day when the «harsh division and polarization» in the research community (an almost inevitable byproduct, unfortunately, of the intense competition for grant money in Concussion, Inc.), gives way to greater collaboration among researchers and a more «cordial discourse» between scientists via letters and responses to journal editors and back - and - forth debates at large academic conferences.

Although on somewhat opposite sides of the debate, nutritional scientists Friel [3] and Lönnerdal [1] both agree that there are certainly some infants who would greatly benefit from iron supplementation prior to six months of age, including infants born prematurely, multiples, and infants whose mothers have severe anemia [1 — 4, 10].

«When I worked at a university, I felt I was on the side of the scientist.

The scientists discovered that the two sides of the cell differ in the composition of messenger RNA, or mRNA: About 30 percent of the genes expressed in the intestines produced mRNAs that appeared either on one side of the cell or on the other.

The project, known as HI - SEAS (Hawaii Space Exploration Analog and Simulation), put an international team of scientists in a solar - powered dome on the side of a Hawaiian volcano last August.

Furthermore, when faced with decisions about sharing, scientists should consider seriously the broader impact of their decisions on the fundamental characteristics of the scientific enterprise and, when at all possible, err on the side of openness.

Climate scientist Jon Foley of the University of Minnesota, who is part of a team of researchers that defined safe limits for 10 planetary systems, including climate, argues for erring on the side of caution.

Now scientists are calling attention to a dangerous area on the opposite side of the Ring of Fire, the Cascadia Subduction Zone, a fault that runs parallel to the Pacific coast of North America, from northern California to Vancouver Island.

On the positive side, most of the whistleblowers profiled by The Scientist say that given the choice, they would do it all over again.

Every morning, the scientists transferred a quarter of each population to the wells on either side of it, simulating a natural dispersal process like fish swimming from one region of a lake to another.

Scientists have discovered a new way to spot solar flares erupting on the far side of the sun.

Research and education institutions on both sides of the Atlantic are taking on the challenge of training a new generation of scientists.

While scientists have generally attributed their swarming mass migrations to food shortages, there's a darker side of that hunger that keeps these insects on the march: If one stops marching, the others will devour it, as seen here.

On the plus side, Mark Citron, vice president of clinical and regulatory affairs at TyRx Pharma in Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, a combination cardiac device manufacturer, says it's much easier for entry - level scientists to find jobs at MD&D companies.

The larger and rarer rough diamonds analyzed in this study — those measuring around a centimeter or more on their longest side — formed deeper within the mantle, taking scientists» understanding of the mantle to new depths.

Previously, to lift an object, scientists had to put banks of speakers on opposite sides of it, or a bank on one side and a sound reflector on the other.

On the other side of the Atlantic, the European Union has set targets for increases in research and development spending that, it predicts, will require 700,000 new scientists in the coming years.