Sentences with phrase «scientists should move»

Only Scientists should move to Mars, just in case.

Four workshops were dedicated to the establishment of general principles on how institutions and scientists should move forward to openness and transparent communication of animal research.

Not exact matches

And scientists, when they can't figure out the origins of a phenomenom, should just assign it to an unknowable God, and move on?

Of course beyond, I'd say, 7 - 8 months of unemployment as a scientist and you really should consider more extreme measures (like unpaid internships to learn more about a hot technique) or, say, a less sexy career move.

Reactions from the people Science Careers contacted — including professional development and policy experts and early - career scientists — suggest that while the report should help highlight the plight of early - career scientists worldwide, its ambition, methodology, and framing inhibit it from really moving the issues forward.

A young scientist doing a postdoc in his Ph.D. lab is wondering whether he should make a move and, if so, whether it should be to another postdoc position or a more independent one.

Scientists have struggled to investigate dark matter since 1933, when astronomer Fritz Zwicky observed a cluster of galaxies moving so fast that, like Hubble's dwarves, they should have been ripping apart.

Such changes would benefit all postdoctoral scientists, male and female — but, the report says, «A move towards longer - term employment of academic researchers should encourage maternity provisions in line with other employment sectors.»

When applying, scientists should be aware of the possibility that winning a grant may actually temporarily limit relocation opportunities due to the «potential costs associated with moving grants,» she suggests.

To change these valuations and move towards equitable and just collaborations, Wilson recommended that there must be funding and management parity between scientists and community members, and that community members should be actively involved in collecting data.

Scientists should be encouraged to move between industry and academy, and all universities should create special units to foster research ideas with possible commercial value.

Scientists studying whether wildlife can adapt to climate change should focus on characteristics such as what they eat, how fast they breed and how well they survive in different habitats rather than simply on how far they can move, a conservation biologist at the University of Exeter says.

According to the scientists, in these circumstances the distortion of the planets should be detectable in transit events, where the planets moves in front of their stars and blocks out some of their light.

The move comes after years of pressure by animal rights and animal welfare advocates, including some scientists who have argued that these animals shouldn't be kept in captivity.

Scientists interested in a medical - writing career should seek projects outside the circles they normally move in.

These educators endorse the assertion by the Commission's Council of Distinguished Scientists that it is time to move «beyond the debate as to whether schools should attend to students» social and emotional development, to how we can integrate social, emotional, and academic development into the mission and daily work of all schools.»

Scientists holding this view say the world should move assertively to curtail emissions of heat - trapping smokestack and tailpipe gases, but mainly to limit the worst outcomes decades down the road — not so much because such actions could reduce today's climate - related risks.

As you might expect in a debate about whether or not the U.S. should make a risky move to perpetuate the use of fossil fuels, some committee members took the opportunity to voice doubt that the constant burning of that energy source was behind the rising temperatures, melting ice sheets, and abnormal weather events most scientists associate with climate change.

If you agree on these points, perhaps we can move on to consider subsequent issues: e.g. whether climate scientists should simultaneously assert intellectual property rights to prevent examination of data while IPCC simultaneously uses such data in policy - related studies.

I have to post a closing comment before moving on to my real work, since this «debate» has moved fully away from the type of discussion the public should expect from professional scientists.

But it looks like an increasingly desperate move when seen in the light of mainstream scientists scratching their heads about the global warming hiatus, and the non-manifest problems that climate change orthodoxy of yesteryear promised we should be expecting by today.

Rasmussen told delegates that «science should be the basis for decision - making in this field», and asked scientists to keep it simple, «not to provide us with too many moving targets... and not too many considerations on uncertainty and risk and things like that.»

When your research shows that lower cholesterol has such a small benefit that it isn't tenable in the studies, a scientist should accept it and move on.

IMHO we should start expecting climate scientists who are moving beyond the descriptive to publish in peer reviewed statistical journals.

Re 233 Frank Giger — regarding the first part; I can understand the concern about scientist - activists, but it should not be so hard to accept that people who actually know things may be moved to publically argue against confusion and misunderstanding.

Jobs Housing both huge corporations and thriving startups, every engineer or computer scientist should learn about Raleigh and consider a move.

They are fathers» rights arguments with wish lists of shoulds, sanctioned and promulgated by professionals who are, in my opinion, abusing their perceived statuses as «scientists» to move social policy for ulterior reasons.