Sentences with phrase «scientists solid evidence»

Not exact matches

Scientist can not give solid physical evidence proving that love exists.

In a political climate increasingly challenging the value of science, scientists and engineers need to summon their scientific knowledge and play a larger role in helping inform public policy with solid evidence, said AAAS CEO Rush Holt during a webinar that explored the outlook for science and technology during the first 100 days of the Trump administration.

«But mounting evidence confirming angiotropism and EVMM has revolutionized the knowledge of how cancer spreads through the body to the point that other scientists have confirmed the process in other solid tumor cell types such as pancreatic cancer.»

Mercury's peculiar magnetic field provides evidence that iron turns from a liquid to a solid at the core's outer boundary, say the scientists, whose research currently appears online in the journal Geophysical Research Letters and will be published in an upcoming print edition.

Although scientists have theorized that Earth's early oceans of magma were two - layered, the new results are the first solid evidence to bolster that notion.

Scientists have the first solid evidence that atrial fibrillation, an irregular heartbeat that affects as many as 2 million Americans and is a major cause of strokes, is inherited in some families.

Scientists haven't yet found any solid proof that life actually existed on ancient Mars — but they have found evidence that the planet could have been habitable.

Scientists have hypothesized for decades that these collisions could serve as a primary source for these heavy elements, yet the idea had lacked solid observational evidence.

These images are cool, but serve a solid purpose: they provide the engineers and scientists here on Earth evidence of precisely how the hardware performed.

On the other hand, the scientists are making pretty strong claims themselves — they're stating that the matching algorithms probably don't work, without much solid evidence of their own.

Unlike these climate scientists, who have solid evidence that humans are not causing the majority of warming and / or the warming is not dangerous, Galileo and his fellow helieocentrists did not have a shred of evidence to back up the claim.

But supposedly some scientist convinced him that there was solid scientific evidence for his statement.

Science has presented us with an overwhelming amount of solid evidence that current climate change is real, caused primarily by us, it is real, it is bad, almost 100 % of climate scientists agree with this science, and we can limit the impact of climate change if we choose.

Earth Day's Legacy of Inaccuracy In their 1970 Earth Day edition, Life Magazine stated, «Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence -LSB-...]

«Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support... the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution... by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half....»

The next stage would be (and I think this is what Barry is suggesting) to find these people with high science intelligence who agree with «most climate scientists agree...» but disagree with «There is solid evidence that...» and ask them why they disagree.

Scientists like to have solid evidence to back up their assertions.

If you sign up to take part in a clinical trial, you can trust that scientists have solid evidence from animal studies that the test drug might work, right?