Sentences with phrase «scientists work side»

Our scientists work side - by - side with our designers.

Our scientists work side - by - side with our designers.

Not exact matches

For instance, George Washington University political scientist John Sides found that the white working - class voters who had first backed Barack Obama only to vote for Trump in 2016 were already moving toward the Republican Party before the campaign got underway.

Scott Stoltzman Data Scientist • Stoltzman Consulting Founder • Flannelytics Since I began working in a coworking space, I often encounter people who do high - level, interesting stuff that doesn't make sense to my feeble, right - side...

The difficulty was, that to say so, even for a scientist with the factsat his fingertips, was to go against a powerful and intolerant conventional wisdom: «We liberals», he wrote, «who work in the fields of global HIV / AIDS and family planning take terrible professional risks if we side with the pope on a divisive topic such as this.

In his wide - ranging address, Archbishop Ravasi insisted that the conference planned was to promote an increased understanding between scientists and theologians: he used an image of those working «at the frontier» on either side being given a better view of the other side.

If someone has a Phd in Physics and works in advertising (with no science on the side as a hobby), is he more of a scientist than a lawyer who does amature astronomy full time after retiring?

The tractor - trailer is driven around the country to customers» locations so companies can work side - by - side Ardent Mills» chefs, food scientists and technical bakers to use its portfolio of ingredients to turn their ideas into reality.

«When I worked at a university, I felt I was on the side of the scientist.

I am by no means a physicist, or even a scientist by training; I entered this line of work from the language side.

It's good when scientists challenge each other and discuss issues as they work together — sometimes taking opposite sides — to disentangle the true and enduring from the fleeting and flawed.

Recently, researchers have created a small army of robots that work side by side with scientists to steward the planet better.

In response, Holdren said, scientists are already an interest group, one that happens to be devoted to its interest in scientific inquiry; science is already politicized because federal funding decisions governing research programs take place in a political arena in which Congress, the executive branch and stakeholders from all sides play leading roles; and, finally, scientists are most worried about the results of their work being lost, not their jobs.

The holder of about 20 patents, Remo continued his research on meteorites on the side, and both strands of work brought him into contact with scientists at various national labs.

Early on, he and the other scientists involved agreed to work on the lander on the side, with no additional research funds — «Marslighting,» they called it.

Of course, working by the side of elite athletes is the most visible career option available to sports and exercise scientists.

PETA may seem well - meaning and benign, but scientists and conservationists who work with animals see its other side and are wary of the organization because it attacks research in order to advance its mission.

A major asset of the OMC platform is the tight integration of preclinical scientists with physicians, who work side by side to comparatively assess pathogenic, diagnostic and therapeutic issues raised in patients with the mouse model counterpart.

This program draws participants from major colleges and universities, and provides students the opportunity to work side - by - side with AGI scientists during the summer months.

These stem cell scientists are working side - by - side, conducting multi-disciplinary, basic research that is envisioned to translate discoveries into clinical cures.

There is a lot of great research on improving Asian rice for African farmers that is being done by brilliant AfricaRice scientists, and they are working hard on the social science side too.

Several groups of scientists, including David Rubinsztein's and that of Junying Yuan at Harvard Medical School, have been working to develop autophagy drugs that have fewer side effects than rapamycin.

This «collaboratory» enables scientists from the La Jolla Institute for Allergy & Immunology, the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, the Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, The Scripps Research Institute, and the University of California, San Diego to work side by side in a facility specifically designed to achieve breakthrough discoveries.

Through this three - year research partnership, scientists from both companies will work side - by - side, initially within Emulate's labs in Boston.

The scientists behind Rozerem's development explain that by targeting melatonin receptors — which are responsible for the brain's sleep - wake cycle — it may avoid the groggy side effects of sedative drugs, which work by slowing down the central nervous system.

It has also been scientifically proven to enhance cognitive function and hGH, although there are no established mechanisms and scientists don't exactly know how it works although it is known to work and devoid of side effects.

On the flip side, however, a research done by several British scientists have found that it is unstable, and does not work as well as regular creatine.

For each animal feed and pet food company, there are animal nutritionists working side - by - side with scientists to formulate the animal diets.

Scientists may not be sure exactly how glucosamine works but overall, the research suggests that glucosamine has some degree of efficacy with few and rare negative side effects.

Tune in as Megan Parker, Co-Founder and Executive Director of Working Dogs for Conservation, talks to Marcie and Whistle about how she works side - by - side with some amazing canine scientists!

The Crissy Field Center will be transformed into the BioBlitz data center where BioBlitzers will work side by side with scientists to identify and catalog what is being discovered in the field.

and «Mad Scientist» Achievements have been fixed «Lightning» Wheel is now properly named «Voltaic» [PS4]: «Insufficient Space» now properly displayed when attempting to save a reply when the console's hard drive is full [PS4]: Saved replays will work properly when transferred from one PS4 to another Vehicle driver - and passenger - side windows no longer have Blue or Orange tint when Black Market decals are equipped Pressing shoulder buttons simultaneously no longer causes Item overlap on vehicle customization screen Chain link pattern no longer visible when using certain Rocket Trails Fixed performance issues with the Proton, Dark Matter, and Hypernova Rocket Trails.

Where once contemporary artists all seemed to be working with scientists, whether experts in space travel or brain surgeons, and looking to the future, now museums and galleries are increasingly showing work from different eras side by side.

Here's an interview from May by a reporter for the news side of the journal Science in which Venter, the entrepreneurial scientist at the heart of the work, explains what he's up to:

The news side of The Times has nine sports blogs; nine spanning fashion, lifestyles, health, dining and the like; four business blogs; four technology blogs (five if you include automobiles as a technology); and a potpourri of other great efforts, with four of my favorites being the Learning Network blog, Scientist at Work, the IHT Rendezvous blog on global news and Lens, run by the paper's photo staff.

He's about the only working climate scientist left on the denialist side.

McKitrick is considered by many on the «skeptical» side of the debate to be an absolutely key player in the debate about climate change, and the veracity / viability climate scientists and the work they produce.

i think that's inaccurate shx, the scientists did their work, and from what i could gather tried very hard not to overstate their case, the media did the scare - mongering and the media have then turned like the whores they are in the other direction, al gore's film upped the tempo and although it seemed like a good thing at the time, i think with hindsight it was a poisoned chalice, but lets be clear, doing research in multiple areas and having the results point to potentially catastrophic climate change and asking for changes to be made to avert this is not scare - mongering, its common sense, accepting that their is margin for error but erring on the side of caution since the stakes are life on earth as we know it is not scare - mongering, it is the application of the precautionary principle and common sense

It never ceases to amaze me that scientists on both sides claim to be certain that they know exactly how all of this stuff works and that their pronouncements concerning whether we will experience runaway warming or start the next glacial episode are correct.

At the same time, I support Ryan O.'s concern about the need for quantitative arguments; I find personal attacks unacceptable in a scientific discussion; finally, from my experience I think that exposure of one's research to specialists in different fields can be extremely productive, to say nothing about the fact that as scientists are working for the humanity, speaking with educated human beings the scientist is speaking with the ultimate consumer of his / her work, which entails both sides to a mutual respect.

They worked to maintain a symbiotic relationship with leading scientists, each side seeking respect and understanding even as they openly used the other for their purposes.

Scientists are working their hardest to create the most accurate possible record of global temperatures, and use a number of methods including tests using synthetic data, side - by - side comparisons of different instruments, and analysis from multiple independent groups to ensure that their results are robust.

A: Even 20 years ago there was work on time series modeling of recent and paleoclimate temperatures (Ghil and Vautard, etc.) The tools of (then current) large scale Kalman filtering were well understood by climate scientists from the dynamic meteorology side of the game (I think Eugene Isaacson brokered some of that deal).

@TerjeP (say Tay - a) Most of the scientists working in climate related science are not on a «side», they are not all in total agreement with each other and they are not all putting forward a narrow unifying theory, despite the way they are being grouped into a straw man by mischief makers.