Sentences with phrase «scientists working in this field about»

There were legitimate debates between scientists working in this field about how reliable different kinds of proxy data are and what are the limits, what are the uncertainties, and then there were the dishonest attacks against the science.

Not exact matches

To be more specific in regard to Rhei, NASA scientists have known about and worked with ferrofluid since the 1960s, and the field of electromagnetics has been around for almost two hundred years.

The vivid awareness of relationships, arising from field theory, has alerted the modern scientist to the complexity of the phenomena in nature to a degree that has made him cautious about employing his findings for any generalized law beyond the status of a working proposition.

The co-chair of the working group responsible for the report, climate scientist Chris Field, spoke repeatedly and eloquently about the need, in the face of uncertainty, to weigh up the risks of possible outcomes.

Stacey Baker, public engagement program associate at AAAS and a trained biologist, spoke with a teenager who wants to study biology about the many paths open to scientists and the other elements beyond your field of study — such as they type of work environment a candidate might be seeking — to keep in mind when selecting a career.

Scientists working on crops in silico anticipate the growing potential of this young field, and what they will learn about foods essential to human survival.

She worked with Ganz for 3 years as a junior scientist, learning about cancer and chronic disease and charting a course in the relatively new field of psycho - oncology before applying for her own research funding.

Try to engage the leaders in your field — the ones you most admire — by sending them your reprints and visiting the ones who work nearby; scientists are always eager to learn about new results in their fields.

Doing a master's degree first is a good idea, he suggests, because it gives would - be Ph.D. scientists the opportunity to better inform themselves about fields in which they might want to specialize for their doctoral work.

Biologists and physicists really do think about living systems in very different ways and it is essential to grasp this to ensure that we develop appropriate innovative strategies to support scientists from all these fields working at the frontier of the life sciences.

If policymakers and politicians want more scientists to stay in this country and contribute to our economy, they ought to think about how to provide work opportunities in their fields that would make that possible.

Intensive training programs like the one Heil attended can be great ways for early - career scientists to learn about nontraditional approaches to conducting science, hone specific research skills, get a crash course in a new field, explore interdisciplinary research, or use focused time to make headway in their work.

Filled with information about bats, the scientists who work with them, and current approaches to bat conservation, this title in the Scientists in the Field series is filled with information, as it dispels myths about the flyiscientists who work with them, and current approaches to bat conservation, this title in the Scientists in the Field series is filled with information, as it dispels myths about the flyiScientists in the Field series is filled with information, as it dispels myths about the flying mammal.

To be sure a «debate» over whether or not human activity is altering the climate still rages, but it is not a clear - headed objective debate about the science among scientists actually working in the relevant fields, it's a debate about the science and its impact on human society in the court of public opinion.

But I do belive that manay of the scientists in this field are so deeply concerned about what they found that they work as advocates....

Often deniers portray themselves as reasoned, cautious, and conservative scientists, while the real scientists working in the field are described with emotionally charged adjectives like «alarmists,» «warmists,» and the like to weaken the public's respect for their work and to fool journalists about who's who.

Well, when it comes to detailed analyses of complex topics, scientists who work in the same field may disagree about the best analysis method, the best model, maybe even the best datasets.

That said, when — if — the reports start filtering in, expect the angle on the stories not to be about the damaging information in the emails — information that, to my layman's eyes, appears to show «scientists» trying to hide data that would hinder their pro-alarmist agenda, but instead about how it was an «invasion of privacy» with quotes from «scientists» and those in related fields expressing «outrage» that the hard work of their colleagues has been «compromised.»

That allows me to express with confidence my thoughts, in which I have fairly strong trust, but when I think, how I could proceed to the level of a scientific publication that would fulfill those criteria that I set for publications of experienced scientists, I notice that I would have to do really much additional ground work — and here I do not talk about going to a field that would be totally alien to me to start with.

At the same time, I support Ryan O.'s concern about the need for quantitative arguments; I find personal attacks unacceptable in a scientific discussion; finally, from my experience I think that exposure of one's research to specialists in different fields can be extremely productive, to say nothing about the fact that as scientists are working for the humanity, speaking with educated human beings the scientist is speaking with the ultimate consumer of his / her work, which entails both sides to a mutual respect.

Scientists working in a field build up a certain intuition about how things «work».

Morner has been repudiated by INQUA and just about every reputable scientist working in the field.

One can «do for science» without being a scientist, as any working scientist will tell you when asked about their lab technicians if they're involved in experimental science, or field techs if they're doing field research.

While scientists working in the nascent field of environmental nanotechnology have already demonstrated its benefits in cleaning up pollutants and monitoring and preventing their spread, others, more concerned about the long - term effects related to exposure and chemical reactivity, have called for studies into ecotoxicology.

Rationalist's problem is that when he doesn't understand what the vast majority of scientists are saying, he doesn't do what a reasonable person does and try to find out more about the science, he assumes he's right and the vast majority of scientists working in the field are wrong.