How do you establish and build your credit
score from nothing?
To do that we need a lewandowski kind of striker, someone who can score dead ball goals, someone who can
score from nothing, someone who can take - on defenders single - handedly when we are canter - attacking.
Why is
scoring from nothing more important than scoring in general??
Not exact matches
I have no data to back this, but I presume that if someone were indoctrinated into religion and then escaped
from it, they may be more likely to self identify as an atheist or agnostic and still
score better than someone never exposed to it in the first place, who might self identify as «
nothing in particular.»
For a guy who came over
from a different league and
scored 19 goals for us so far, I have
nothing but respect and gratitude to Alexis.
Ox needed 1 min to create a real chance
from nothing, If Giruod played
from yesterday till now he could not
score a single goal
Nothing you could ever do to Giroud would ever make him come good just
nothing.Its not a formation set up that gets a player to dribble,
score, be world class, be dependable, wow the crowd and the like.Its the players» own ability that makes him do that.Once you don't have it ya ain't gat it brother.Read my lips!!!!! Once ya don't have it ya ain't gat it.As simple as ABC.So I expect this to be another de ja vu case and waste of time if Giroud and Alexis are paired.I'm even shocked it's coming
from Henry.He should rather be giving us more reasons why we need a new striker and why we would fail if we don't get the new striker.Forget Giroud's stats for a moment and judge him by how he plays when you are watching him.You would realize that given the same chances at Arsenal strikers who are not even world class can do better.I want a new striker even if not world class and to be honest its not necessarily a world class striker that wins you a league but just increases the chances of winning it.Peace!!!!
broad statements about whom and where to beat or which players should
score how many goals on average are just unnecessary statements which says
nothing about the title, only throwaway opinion
from the pundits who have no plans, every singlw title winner in the last 10 years will have drawn at home against teams they were expected to beat,
nothing wrong there
Giroud is very good and
scores but not consistent, misses chances and doesn't perform well against big teams / big moments and can't pull a goal
from nothing) 4.
Nothing to worry about, especially when we've got an alien
from Egypt always
scoring for us.
Lacazette is not like Alexis Sanchez who could conjure up goals out of
nothing, but he is a very good finisher and should be feeling confident after getting back on the
score sheet in his first game back
from injury.
WE need a Costa type striker (
Nothing wrong with Giroud) who can
score by making his own goals apart
from taking clear chances, Additional creativity to fight for OZIL (No disrespect but for 42M he has not proved to be a game changer in Big games — Better players even cost less e.g Costa, Hazard - HE MUST DO MORE) and Cazorla position.
There is
nothing wrong with a QB who can
score from anywhere on the field with his feet.
People will then be excited about the beginning of the following season thinking we going to pick up
from where we left off, then on the 3rd game we will realise that
nothing has changed.We will still have Wenger as our manager, mediocre players, shambolic defence, a striker that
scores 1 of the 5 chances he gets, no DM, BFG as vice captain, Arteta leading the team as our DM, Sczerny in goal and a medical room filled with half our squad.
Dado Pršo
scores four goals: the first a decent header
from a corner; the second another header (though it looks suspiciously like it comes off his face) following some cosmically bad defending; the third a tap into an empty net; the fourth a smart enough finish but
nothing spectacular.
Saying all this we do need a striker who can do it alone an aguero type who can
score goals
from nothing.
Feels a bit like a panic buy but if he does
nothing more than push Giroud so we see the player
from the Euros rather that the player who went one - third of last season without
scoring than he's worth every penny.
Alexis is not
scoring as many as we would like him to and the contribution
from (Theo + Ox + Ramsey + Campbell) is next to
nothing.
With more than 20 attempts on target and surreal saves
from DeGea, there were clear plans on
scoring...
Nothing compared to the West Ham game!
Still I don't understand it, A Carrols goal was the equivalent of big toeing the ball
from six to eight yards, I thought there was
nothing extraordinary about it unless you consider that heifer
scoring anything besides a header extraordinary.
He has
scored many goals for us, but he is inconsistent, hardly ever
score against top clubs or in big moments, pulls out a goal
from nothing.
Begovic had already had to prodduce two very good saves
from Alexis Sanchez and Tomas Rosicky in the opening minutes, but there was
nothing their keeper could do to stop Laurent Koscielny
scoring with a feee header
from Alexis» cross in the 6th minute.
In all his matches he struggle to get his self in any good position to have shots on goal most of his play have been one touch football which comes to
nothing, his best and only option of
scoring looks to be headers
from corners and free kicks deliverd in the box.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly
from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball...
from our backs out wide, we've seen pace
from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of
scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't
score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is
nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Either way, I would say it is
nothing much to worry about; when he gets game time he will
score and assist;
from the minutes we have seen he manages to get himself a 1v1 with the goalie every match so it's only a matter of time before his composure comes back.
There's
nothing wrong with having a go
from distance — if you don't shoot you won't
score after all.
«That's just what we need — he can
score goals not just when we're dominating the game but he can really turn the game on its head with a goal
from a set - piece or out of
nothing and that's what he did.
observations, corner kick for arsenal means
nothing, do nt think we will
score from a corner all season, second observation - this is what this team looks like when alexi's goals go dry, girouds season average of 13 GPM wont cut it, point three should have let theo go, pedros style would have suited arsenal w giroud coming off the bench.
He was defending on the right and was all over Hazard, Hazard was doing
nothing and then he drifted into the middle to get away
from Gabriel, Gabriel had to hold his position on the right and Hazard takes the ball 50m and
scores.
Welbeck is just not good enough, all he does is to run around all game, no end product
from him,
nothing, we signed him to
score goals but he spend more time chasing the ball due to his poor first touch..
Taking
nothing from Wilshere as I screamed when he
scored that banger but how many times has Wilshere
scored such goals?
His incredible
scoring in this series (27 points per game on 55 % shooting
from the field, to say
nothing of his five rebounds and six assists) is owed to that considered physicality.
It'll be «ohhh he only
scores tap - ins,» «half of them were against weaker sides,» «he can't create
from nothing.»
Both teams played to win that game like it was a bpl game, not a friendly, but pundits say you can't take anything
from it as it was
nothing but a friendly, yet be tell
scores a volley against Swindon town in a friendly and he's suddenly liverpools saviour!
Fran Vazquez and Joaquin Correa regularly create
scoring chances
from nothing.
When they
score is like they hit us with a hammer and
nothing works
from there on.
He made a huge leap in his
scoring and his efficiency while taking
nothing else away
from his game.
9 Tugay (Blackburn Rovers)
Scores one cracking fluke per season â $ «apart
from that, does
nothing much.
http://www.goonersden.com/ — An Arsenal Blog http://www.wearearsenalblog.com/– An Arsenal Blog http://www.justarsenal.com/ — An Arsenal Blog http://www.justarsenalblogs.com/– Multiple Arsenal Blog Feeds http://www.afcnews.com/ — Arsenal News http://www.ronaldo7.net — Arsenal Live Streaming http://arsenalevel.com — European Arsenal News & Articles http://www.soccerway.com — Latest News &
Scores From Around The World Of Football http://thearsenalblog.weebly.com/ — Arsenal,
Nothing Else
It will not be an easy game because they have
nothing to lose and will put everything they have
from the beginning, so we have to take the pitch in good spirits and, if we can
score an early goal to make the tie difficult for them and put them in a tough position», he explained.
Gagliardini could easily of had a hattrick which says a lot about the opposition... Candreva was unlucky not to
score and even Éder had a claim for one or two penalties which might have been given on another day but apart
from that, there's
nothing we can complain about.
Of course, that might have
nothing to do with Lasogga, but managers that value their position in a team don't bench strikers who
score hat - tricks, no matter the pedigree of the player coming back
from injury.
They have
scored well away
from home averaging 1.4 goals so again, it's worth backing them to get on the scoresheet if
nothing else.
what a joke!how can we go
from absolutely dominating one half to complete self destruction in the second?watching us in the first half I would have said no team in the league could have lived with us, never mind bloody Tottenham!second half were shocking.what was bales goal all about?a hoof over the top and our defence all taken out in one go.the second was an even bigger farce.why the hell couldn't cesc just head the thing.we should have been out of sight by then.what kind of striker is chamakh?what is his problem.twice he was played clean through and he had no intention of going for goal.work rate is all well and good and being able to put it in
from 3 yards but if he is going to lead the line he needs to have a proper strikers instinct.sure enough if we give away enough stupid free kicks then the opposition will
score because we cant defend and thats exactly what happened.we'll be winning
nothing unless we buy some players with spines and balls.getting beat to 2 newly promoted teams and spurs at home.way to let chelsea off the hook fellas.what did wenger say yesterday...» best squad ive ever had....
I'm thrilled with my RueLaLa purchase and know that
scoring Borns for under $ 100 is
nothing to complain about, but it's a good reminder that many companies design
from the same «inspiration.»
For all the blather about binaural beats and neurolinguistic programming, the 21st - century hypnosis currently rescuing our starlets
from the demons of their own nature is
nothing but good old - fashioned 20th - century self - affirmation set to a New Age
score of trip - hop backing tracks and whale belches.
An equation that combines multiple subtest
scores into one could make fooling a concussion protocol
nothing more than a fool's errand, says a recent study
from the University of Nebraska - Lincoln.
Players can either choose creatures
from a gallery below (an innovation choice, since
nothing is known about creatures in the gallery) or they can choose team members by copying creatures directly
from the other players» teams (an imitation choice, since they can see the other players»
scores).
My mom has
scored some amazing things over the years -
from furniture, to brand new area rugs, to kitchen appliances, to home decor, and so on and so on - for next to
nothing.
There's
nothing in these
scores that tell you about personality, chemistry, or even whether you are heading in the same direction in life (aside
from whether or not you want to make more kids).