Sentences with phrase «score over time if»

I could improve my score over time if need be and if I lost the rental property I would just be back to where I started to begin with.

Not exact matches

Not only will your credit score increase over time, you won't pay as much interest — which, if you think about it, is just giving lenders money you would rather stayed in your pocket.

If you have flexibility on the timing of your trip, compare prices to see if you might score extra savings by picking one week over anotheIf you have flexibility on the timing of your trip, compare prices to see if you might score extra savings by picking one week over anotheif you might score extra savings by picking one week over another.

Lower average test scores might not be a problem if you can find out that kids are rapidly improving over time, making that cute house in the cheaper part of town not only good for your wallet, but good for your child's education too.

If I've proven anything here, it's that delinquencies are incredibly damaging to your score, which can translate into big costs over time.

However, if you keep an eye on the credit tracker, and keep to good practices that will raise your credit score, over time you can request to have a product change — that is your Journey ® Student Rewards from Capital One ® account can be upgraded to the Capital One ® Quicksilver ® Cash Rewards Credit Card

If you're able to make consistent, timely payments towards your student loans, you may see your credit score improvement over time.

If you're careful about paying down your debt quickly and always making timely payments, your credit score will improve over time.

Traditionally, if you have exceptional personal credit, but little to no business credit, your score will start somewhere near 140, and you can improve that over time.

In some six decades of churchgoing, I have listened to scores, if not hundreds, of preachers, many of them over extended periods of time.

The Argentine was mesmerising at times over both legs, played a part in all three goals and would have got on the score - sheet if it wasn't for the heroics of Hart.

Arsene Wenger can must get Ben Yedder as long as he's clinical and can beat his man.I'd take him over Giroud any day and I think if Giroud is put in that Toulouse squad he won't score more goals than Ben Yedder and denying this fact would mean you choose to be blinded.We had better get him quickly.I've said it here time and time again the reason why Arsenal are not winning things with Giroud is because he's not clinical.If you guys were to ever watch his misses in every season by season since he came here you would be shocked at the kind of striker we have.But as usual he's always forgiven and people continually rate him basing it on statistics and forget he's playing for Arsenal with the likes of.......

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

if you watch arsenal place I see so much space and no runs no runs at all only when in the box if you watch Leicester they are always makeing runs all over the place that's how you score goals against a team like Southampton they controlled the game it was not unlucky just like chelsea can do control the game and won arsenal players don't believe they can win the title the players in that team play without heart you know why because Im sure wenger tells them becareful we don't need anymore Injurys what kind of mentality is that also I will pick out Ramsey he is playing like a player who is leaveing the club he and flamini just don't work Ramsey is not playing good at all wenger can blame make excuses but truth is he is the manager he make the tactics and he gets it wrong all the time giroud has no pace none bench him against some teams and play pure pace make runs ox Walcott but they don't Walcott has lost it his pace has gone its clear or he fears I jury how if a player is fit put your all in forget injury if you get Injured then so be it but if your fit and your Walcott run put yourself about wenger should leave because he.

you wont see a cazorla or a xavi losing possession, not only that but they drive the team forward.but unfortunately u hav players like ramsey, who do nt drive the attack like the above two, also he loses possessions sometimes by attempting fancy moves.its sad ramsey gives more importance to style over substance.unfortunately, i feel players like ramsey hav contributed to arsenal's inability... imagine a team like barcelona playing with him, constantly losing posession leading to conceding goals and so on.difference is barca's manager wud take them out, while under wenger u r rewarded with the nxt game!!!! i do nt deny he was top notch a season or two back, but now hes a liability imo and need to change his mentality.even that opportunity he got against tottenham where thought longer before taking a shot thus giving defender time to get to him and take off the ball.i bet if it was cazorla, arsenal wud hav scored...

players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes

If Dalton isn't able to go for an extended period of time, it will be AJ McCarron taking over the reins of one of the NFL's highest - scoring offenses.

Evidence suggests that he's pretty much on a par with other big names at the leading clubs in the Premier League, however, scoring four times against the traditional «big six» sides this season (five if you include his wondergoal in the Community Shield win over Manchester City).

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse

If you want to paint a picture to compare Giroud to Rooney paint it over a similar time what that guy was doing earlier was averaged his goal ratio over Rooney's 11 year period in the league instead of the last 3 years in which Giroud played in the BPL, Oh on Average in the last 3 season Now Rooney has just scored 23.3 Goals a season to Girouds 15..

This season, in a hard - going campaign in which no player has scored over five league goals, he continued to stand out for his electric running with the ball if not his goals and assists in a side that has fallen down the table and has often looked utterly dysfunctional at times over the last few months.

But then, of course, on came Olivier Giroud, up went the tempo and the temperature and, in what ranks as, if not my favourite eight minutes of the entire season, then at least as my favourite eight minutes of this month, we romped all over the pitch, scored three times and flipped the situation over.

If both teams will score 5 or more runs exactly half the time, meaning both teams have a fair Team Total of 4.5, you could safely bet the game to go over 9.5 at even money even though the Team Totals only add up to 9.

But, if Antonio scores the first goal of the game, West Ham lead 1 - 0 at half time, West Ham win the game 3 - 1, and Obiang scores one of the second half goals, then our stake will win us over 200 points.

Everton opened with a 1 - 0 home win over Stoke, and look as if they are going to need a little time to find their scoring output.

Bolton are still reeling from the disappointment of losing for the first time at home this season, with Liverpool scoring an 86th minute winner last weekend, but if they can overcome that mental obstacle then we certainly wouldn't write them off bouncing back in style against a Spurs side still revelling in the success over Inter Milan in midweek.

So if the EndoPAT score is a true measure of endothelial functionality, you will see the effect of a high fat diet, not in a single score, but in the trajectory of scores over time as the endothelial lining of your arteries is eroded away.

Even if your 10 - year risk score isn't high, metabolic syndrome will increase your risk for coronary heart disease over time.

I really miss John Barry, after his departure from Bond we had to make do with some adequate scores over several years even from David Arnold, then along came a new Bond in the form of Mr Craig and wow DA really found the formula for Bond and composed two truly magnificent scores if only he could have done Skyfall, that said lets give Thomas Newman a chance see the film with the score then listen to the score as stand alone then we can judge, one thing, I really wish just once they could use John Barry's brilliant 007 theme in a sequence just for old times sake and as a tribute to the man that gave Bond so much.

He's a versatile composer and pleasingly seems to give each of his projects a unique feeling — his big breakthrough, Battlestar Galactica, had such a distinctive sound that it would have been understandable if he'd gone on to do the same thing over and over again, but he hasn't — and this beast of a score is angry and at times savage but consistently entertaining, in the style of classic horror scores.

Test - retest reliability over short periods of time is the preeminent psychometric question for report card items because the data are not useful if scores that teachers generate for individual students on individual items are unstable during a period of time in which it is unlikely that the student has changed.

• too much school time is given over to test prep — and the pressure to lift scores leads to cheating and other unsavory practices; • subjects and accomplishments that aren't tested — art, creativity, leadership, independent thinking, etc. — are getting squeezed if not discarded; • teachers are losing their freedom to practice their craft, to make classes interesting and stimulating, and to act like professionals; • the curricular homogenizing that generally follows from standardized tests and state (or national) standards represents an undesirable usurpation of school autonomy, teacher freedom, and local control by distant authorities; and • judging teachers and schools by pupil test scores is inaccurate and unfair, given the kids» different starting points and home circumstances, the variation in class sizes and school resources, and the many other services that schools and teachers are now expected to provide their students.

Even if teachers are not sufficiently aware of the statistical forces at work to recognize their rather limited influence on test scores in the short run, they may well become aware of this over time.

Yes, they do often use test score results selecting who to fund, but I suspect this will change if a better way to invest is developed over time.

If money «causes» education outcomes to improve, test scores of students in the two groups will diverge over time.

Moreover, genetic influences need not have the same effect on test scores throughout the lifecycle, since any genetic effects may be amplified over time if they also affect the environmental influences that people seek out for themselves.

In low - wealth districts, officials are warning the public that they should expect low grades for their schools, even if they have succeeded in bringing students up on test scores over time.

If you record formative scores, what happens is you can pick up students» learning over time; you can determine knowledge gained or value added, so it's very powerful.

Even with strong majorities favoring time to adjust, over three - quarters (78 %) of voters believe teachers should continue to be evaluated based in part on test scores during the transition with 26 % believing those evaluations should be used only to reward good work or provide guidance to improve teaching and 19 % agreeing only if the evaluations are not used to hire or fire teachers.

That is, more precisely and as indicated in the actual study, SLOs were «not significantly correlated with a teacher's value - added student test scores;» hence, «a teacher is no more likely to meet his or her SLO targets if [his / her] students have higher levels of achievement [over time].»

If you need to get a loan, having a good score will ensure you pay the cheapest rate over time.

If you make on - time payments and keep your balance low (no more than 30 %, and preferably less than 10 %) relative to your credit limit, use of a secured card can be a tool to help you improve your credit score and overall credit standing over time.

Numerous hard credit inquiries can have a negative impact on your credit score if they involve multiple types of credit over a short period of time.

If there is no annual fee, just keep the card and stick it in a drawer since having more credit will improve your credit score over time.

If we can offer any other great tip to improve your credit score, we would advise you to add credit over time.

However, if you keep an eye on the credit tracker, and keep to good practices that will raise your credit score, over time you can request to have a product change — that is your Journey ® Student Rewards from Capital One ® account can be upgraded to the Capital One ® Quicksilver ® Cash Rewards Credit Card

The only time it can affect your credit score is if you are carrying over a balance month to month, therefore it is appearing on your monthly statements which are seen by credit reporting agencies.

If you're able to make consistent, timely payments towards your student loans, you may see your credit score improvement over time.

If you have a high credit limit with your USAA Secured Card ® American Express ® account keeping the balance low can lead to a higher score over time.

Furthermore, if everything stays consistent during the program, such as your on - time payments, your credit history (which will have been rebuilt over several years) should be cleaned up and your credit score in good shape.