Sentences with phrase «scores by individual teachers»

Value - added models are statistical models that generally try to isolate the contributions to student test scores by individual teachers or schools from factors outside the school's or teacher's control.

Not exact matches

The sleeper in this is that schools are now able to measure individual teacher performance by NAPLAN scores.
These functions include the ease with which teachers and other adults who are regularly around individual students can directly observe the soft skills they are expected to support, the clear implications for intervention suggested by low scores on a particular skill by a particular student or group of students, the signals sent to administrators about teachers and groups of students who may need additional help, and the usefulness in communicating with parents.
These new systems depend primarily on two types of measurements: student test score gains on statewide assessments in math and reading in grades 4 - 8 that can be uniquely associated with individual teachers; and systematic classroom observations of teachers by school leaders and central staff.
A handful of school districts and states — including Dallas, Houston, Denver, New York, and Washington, D.C. — have begun using student achievement gains as indicated by annual test scores (adjusted for prior achievement and other student characteristics) as a direct measure of individual teacher performance.
This statistical methodology introduced a new paradigm for predicting student academic progress and comparing the prediction to the contribution of individual teachers (or value added) as measured by student gain scores.
They tried to isolate how much any individual teacher adds or detracts by comparing how the students scored on end - of - year tests to how similar students did with other teachers, controlling for a host of such things as test scores in the prior year, gender, suspensions, English language knowledge, and class size.
Obama's emphasis on evaluating individual teachers by students» test scores has set off a frenzied effort by states to rewrite their laws in hopes of snaring some of the federal billions.
Last summer, the Los Angeles Times created a furor with its hotly debated decision to post the value - added scores for thousands of Los Angeles teachers and to identify individual teachers, by name, as more or less effective.
As explained in a guest blog this year by by FairTest's Lisa Guisbond, these measures use student standardized test scores to track the growth of individual students as they progress through the grades and see how much «value» a teacher has added.
For instance, in addition to the use of test scores and SGP, much of the discussion focused on separate achievement measures for each teacher that will be developed by individual teachers and their principals.
The EPI assessment allows Phoenix # 1 to maintain those standards in hiring by creating a composite score for each teacher candidate, as well as individual scores for three of four key success indicators shown to predict teacher effectiveness in research conducted by a consortium of experts in the fields of research, education, psychometrics and predictive analytics.
The Times sought three years of district data, from 2009 through 2012, that show whether individual teachers helped — or hurt — students academic achievement, as measured by state standardized test scores.
Other limitations included small data sets (Kruger, 2005) and the inability to disaggregate test scores that had been compiled at the school level by individual teacher or students (Isenberg et al., 2009).
Value - added models try to separate the contribution of individual teachers or schools to students» learning growth measured by standardized test scores.
Wilson describes a situation in which the agreement demanded by rubrics led to teachers» censoring their individual perspectives on a piece of writing, resulting in tidy but bland scoring.
A group of Los Angeles teachers Wednesday unveiled their own proposal for a new performance review system that would use both state standardized test scores and assessments chosen by individual schools to measure how well instructors help their students learn.
Related efforts to evaluate individual teachers based on student test scores have sparked a flurry of publicity — and led to a federal lawsuit filed by a group of Florida teachers who complained they would be rated on the test scores of students who weren't even in their classes.
Apparently relying on standardized test scores that are influenced by economic and social factors beyond a teacher's control are deemed the best way to evaluate an individual teacher....
Value - added goes deeper than grading schools on student test scores by looking at how individual teachers and schools as a whole contribute to improvements in the test scores.
Once we control statistically for the quality of individual teachers by the use of teacher fixed effects, we find large returns to experience for middle school teachers in the form both of higher test scores and improvements in student behavior, with the clearest behavioral effects emerging for reductions in student absenteeism.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z