Sentences with phrase «scores only changed»

In round one, however, scores only changed by 4.6 points on average after the interviews, not a significant margin on the 500 - point grading scale.

Not exact matches

Because only so many 4s and 5s could be allotted, talented people no longer wanted to work together; strategic goals were sacrificed, as employees did not want to change projects and leave themselves open to a lower score.

Unlike your credit score or revenue, the age of your business is not something you can easily change or increase (as it only improves with time!).

Particular scores for particular nation - states change through time, but the tendency for one characteristic of a nation to associate with another characteristic changes only very slowly if at all.

I can only give it a 3 based on my changes, so maybe not a fair score for the white cake.

Here in South Africa the team that i support the fans did a pitch invasion they were chasing the players and the technical staff after a team play against scored 6th goal in the 80th min, fans were angry at the chairman who promised them the coach in January, the coach only came after the pitch invasion in middle of Feb, maybe Arsenal needs that to enforced the change.

If someone told them before the game the offense would only score 13 points, then yeah they would have changed the plan.

Walcott started this campaign by missing a penalty against Liverpool, suggesting that some things never change, only for him to score moments later.

If you've been the Emirates youll know only too well the games I mean, Arsenal would have several hundred attempts on goal but just couldn't score, and even though in times past the calmness and composure of Arsene would filter down to the players and the goal would come (no matter how late) times had changed and now the players knew that if they missed that chance or misplaced that pass the fans would groan or moan, and this led to the tension that has haunted the Emirates ever since.

Rvo only started scoring 20 + when Wenger changed the system to suit one goal scorer.

That was a game changing event only due to the fact that it was over for even thinking you can score again, let alone qualifying.

@Nothing Changed i agree about 5 years ago, personally i'm finding our game exiting to watch with a strong belief that no mater what the score is we will win the game, obviously we don't win every game but the belief is there for me and i'm enjoying watching more then last season, we have to except that some teams in Europe are almost impossible to catch and City is coming close to that point of dominating years to come and only Man - U or Chelsea could muster up a small challenge, sad but unfortunately we have to face up to reality.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

And wins win you the PL Title Our defense including goalkeeper have been excellent and they have been giving us chances of winning but we end up losing or drawing many times because our goal scorers have been misfiring In my opinion, our strikers have been letting down the great work of Cech, bellerin, koscielny, Mert, Moneal, Coquelin, Cazorla, Ramey, and especially our Assist leader Ozil Mahrez and Vardy in particular have been dynamite this season for Leicester So far in terms of our Offense only Ozil, and Cazorla have been been of the same quality but they aren't goal scorers per se If Welbeck, Alexis, Walcott and Giroud can start scoring, then things can change Hopefully, they can start tomorrow COYG

you wont see a cazorla or a xavi losing possession, not only that but they drive the team forward.but unfortunately u hav players like ramsey, who do nt drive the attack like the above two, also he loses possessions sometimes by attempting fancy moves.its sad ramsey gives more importance to style over substance.unfortunately, i feel players like ramsey hav contributed to arsenal's inability... imagine a team like barcelona playing with him, constantly losing posession leading to conceding goals and so on.difference is barca's manager wud take them out, while under wenger u r rewarded with the nxt game!!!! i do nt deny he was top notch a season or two back, but now hes a liability imo and need to change his mentality.even that opportunity he got against tottenham where thought longer before taking a shot thus giving defender time to get to him and take off the ball.i bet if it was cazorla, arsenal wud hav scored...

Arsenal are only five points behind the leaders and that could all change after Leicester play Man City, but Wenger just wants to concentrate on getting back to scoring goals from within the Arsenal side.

Well your righ with met spend but in amount paid out for players no net were 5th but i agree our champions league performances have been poor we had some tough draws and the premier league is more demanding then the other leagues in strwnght of competition and games played still excuses do nt win but that monaco loss left me shaking my head in cl we get theough the group but cant muster the strength needed for knockout and we should be performing better were under performing for the talent xhaka has frustrated me hes got the talent and plays well but cant hold focus in games he drops off and loses his marks our academy is doing well but yes it is tougher now to break in to the first team iwobi has done well but one or two seasons away from being there if he does turn himself elite ever has to score or he will just be another ox but i think its been a wake up call to the club we finally have to act theres a wave of ideas to not only get us back to winning ways but become title contenders and i think give him the extension one year its a world cup year and that will also allow our players esp strikers who been very poor this year realized its tough to play in englad and next year will have a better idea what it really takes to win here shore up some spots and depth and were in contention fail and the changes will happen but let him have one more year the fact were willing to spend shows me an upturn from the decline

Kinda makes sense though, the only reason people are asking for another CDM is because we all fear the possibility of injury to coquelin and know flamini is usless, beilick is inexperienced so it begs the question what happens if an injury where to occur, but wîth how many midfielders we have in the squad i think it could allow us to change a tactical approach and potentially experiment with people like Ramsey and Wishere potentially playing a deeper role??? But the striker is a must as i mentioned earlier Giroud went 8 games without scoring a goal and none of the other strikers stepped up to the plate, we cant have a drought of goals when your the quest for titles...

Only a few impossible last - minute deeds by the Cowboys could have changed the outcome of Super Bowl X, and though they were dead game and scored one more touchdown they just were not quite a good enough football team to pull it off.

And to be honest the change of formation didn't help our attacking capabilities either as we only scored once in the 180 minutes!

Ozil and Giroud are the only offensive players we have fit who could change the game, hopefully Giroud has the same boots on as last seasons game against Utd (well the ones he scored with anyway) and if Ozil does play, we need him to have a great game, I think he does get unfairly criticised at times but if the fans can't see him pulling the strings and creating chances then they might get on his back and his head could drop.

I bet next season he will be hard to get a game if he doesn't change, it's not about resting it's about his game, now we have more players to chose from he is only trying to score buy not playing to be part of the team.

I think we did well today, we tire them out and Wenger brought in Gibbs for pace, which was a good change... If They hadn't scored in the first half and Giroud had put one of those headers away, it would have been a whole different match all together... I think Campbell did well, he might be a little slow but he is gelling well with the team and getting better, he doesn't just burst forward without purpose and when he did today, it took a good save from Iloris to keep it out and he got a round of applause from both the fans and his team mates, which to me is good and will only boost his confidence and that's one thing we haven't seen in quite some time, a proper right winger.

I know a lot of people have been hammering on about this change, and while it's true that some of this only comes with the benefit of hindsight, I'd like to point out I tweeted this before Barcelona ever scored:

Only Bournemouth right back Adam Smith and Watford's free - scoring Odion Ighalo were retained as Redknapp ruthlessly rung the changes.

«We could have scored three or four goals but we didn't do it and we risked losing three points for immature mistakes that could have changed the game The only excuse I can find is that we played a very important game a few days ago against Arsenal where we spent a lot in terms of condition.

he got 100s of chances last year, but he only scored 30 something goals,,,, may be he will change some time later but this only works if he remains an arsenal player... if not i am definately sure that no boss can tolerate him as arsene did...... and also no fan can tolerate manager of the club as arsenal fans tolarated wenger.....

Amid delays that were based, in part, on political point - scoring, the system lasted only five years before the Welsh Assembly Government moved forward with a referendum to get rid of the LCO system and devolve further powers in one go — evidence, perhaps, that a system which requires the agreement of both devolved and central governments on policy changes might prove detrimental to effective governance.

Very little change on last week, with Labour recording exactly the same score and only the Conservatives moving by more than half a point (and then just barely).

The two scores are not directly comparable, however, due to changes made to improve and update the questions and methodology, such as eliminating the category for redistricting, a process that generally occurs only once every 10 years.

They band eventually changed their nom de plume to Priestbird and only began their film scoring career as a duo in 2010 with the Cannes Directors» Fortnight effort «Two Gates of Sleep» starring Brady Corbet.

The gameplay doesn't change at all, with the only notable addition being a small window on the left side of the screen that visually compares the scores of all the party members.

As bad as it looks, the worst aspect of the entire film happens to be the horrible music, scored by Ron Geeson, which is not only uninspiring, it doesn't even seem to change depending on the mood or scene.

I also felt that the musical score was somewhat forced for the purpose of provoking on the emotional level and was only there to make up for the lack of it in the film, it did seem quite unnecessary in parts where I thought silence could have worked better, but thats not to say of course that it was brilliant to listen too, and the changes were spot on to suit the changes determined in the film but for a simplistic kind of story it seemed excessive.

This mod completely changes the way you approach doom... Survive is a old school arcade style shooter, surviving and scoring kills are the only objectives...

Straight Outta Compton Rated R for language throughout, strong sexuality / nudity, violence, and drug use Rotten Tomatoes Score: 88 % Available on DVD and Blu - ray Biopics can be very hit and miss but this critically acclaimed story about the rap group NWA found a way to not only tell one of the pivotal stories of rap music, but managed to do so in a way that has the power to change the perspectives of its audience.

I can only hope they have a good score for the game because the music could be a nice change to a mario game.

Jonny Greenwood, Best Original Score, Phantom Thread (No prior nominations) Speaking of overlooked composers: Yes, he's only been scoring films for a minute and some change.

In fact, the only misstep might be veteran composer Howard Shore's (Fargo) moderately dreary score, but I'm not entirely certain I'd hold to that opinion if push came to shove, the director using it with such subtle restraint my feelings on this matter could easily change with subsequent viewings.

«Schools and learning need a movement to change not just the way we teach, but also how we think about teaching and learning,» Yamashiro says, noting that education needs to be valued in American society and focused on not only test scores and economic success, but also on the whole child and finding joy in learning.

Reducing the number of students who contribute to a teacher's value - added score not only changes the chance that a teacher will receive a particular rating; it also increases the likelihood that she will receive the wrong rating.

If only one student in the class opts out, value - added scores barely change at all — the correlation is 0.99 (on a scale from 0 to 1).

Not only will you see a marked change in performance afterward, you'll probably notice an upswing in your course evaluation scores as well.

While SAT scores are not particularly useful for long - term analyses of high - school performance because they include only a limited and changing pool of students, they do tell us something about the elite group that does pursue higher education.

The corresponding changes among eighth - grade math scores are small only in comparison: 6 points nationwide, 11 points for black students, 10 points for Hispanic students, and 8 points for those students at the 10th percentile.

When we constructed a more limited Chance - for - Success Index that included only those indicators that signal education quality — pre-school and kindergarten enrollment, 4th — and 8th - grade proficiency scores, and high school graduation rates — we learned that the rankings of states changed a good deal.

But since those statistics changed only modestly since 2009, the scores on the Chance - for - Success Index change little: the highest scoring state, Massachusetts, went from 94.6 to 93.3 and Nevada's last place score went from 67.3 to 67.0.

By a 10 - 2 vote, the Senate education committee approved a bill last week that would not only change the state tests students take, but also erase several years» worth of judgments about school effectiveness that have been made based on the test scores.

If we did that we would see not only a change in social behavior but improved test scores as well.

The sometimes - D schools experienced year - to - year changes in FCAT math scores that were only 2.4 points higher than all other Florida public schools, significantly less than the gains in both voucher - eligible and voucher - threatened schools.