Sentences with phrase «screencapture here»

The closest the newsletter (available on Heartland's website to this day) comes to such wording is the basic truism seen in its second page, (screencapture here):

And then we have this gem from Natural Resources Defense Council climate campaign director Pete Altman at his 2009 blog (screencapture here)

All this pride, despite the presence of skeptic climate scientist Dr John Christy (Ph.D., Atmospheric Sciences) in the first McCain hearing (not listed in Ozone Action's list from that same hearing), and the presence skeptic climate scientist Dr S. Fred Singer (Ph.D., physics) in the second hearing, a person previously held in massive dislike by Ozone Action regarding his congressional hearing appearance on topic of ozone depletion, and held in massive dislike by Ozone Action on the topic of global warming — in a press release attack of Dr Singer, (screencapture here), having Kalee Kreider — future spokesperson for Al Gore — as one of the contacts.

That's Matthew Anderson Stembridge, oddly renamed as simply Matthew Anderson in his 2012 «Green Corps Class of 2000» endorsement of his trainers, the individual I described in 2010 as co-author with Phil Radford of pro-global warming material (link broken in my 2010 piece, but is here as a PDF file, screencapture here) distributed into religious organizations that failed to identify what organization he and Radford were affiliated with.

Bonus political points, however, for the then - current IPCC Chairman for naming three of the most famous skeptic scientists accused of being industry - funded shills (screencapture here):

Whether Radford cares to admit it or not now, Ozone Action wasn't shy about its efforts back in February 2000, as preserved in this press release (screencapture here):

You see, that is essentially exactly what he meant six years earlier, but without any ambiguity — full transcript here, screencapture here:

Yet in March 2013, Hertsgaard said the following (screencapture here):

First, for those unaware of it, SEPP puts out a weekly «The Week That Was» global warming news round - up, and their week of March 10, 2018 included a «Standards of Evidence» item featuring a list of «tutorial» questions the presiding judge of the Oakland case was asking for, regarding largely science material — screencapture here for easier finding within SEPP's pages.

The part within the current Oregon Petition page about fictional names, with a much more simplified solitary Seattle Times source, (screencapture here) was first placed there on March 31, 2007 — only three weeks and a day after «The Great Global Warming Swindle» was broadcast.

But look what is seen in Wikipedia's history page for the edit just one minute and 35 seconds earlier, at the 12:50 point: Myanna Lahsen's paper as the sole source for fictional names in the petition (screencapture here).

I already knew of the accusation that fictional names were said to be in the Oregon Petition, when I detailed the wipeout within the claim in my October 4, 2010 American Thinker piece, by pointing to a much - lesser - seen longer version of a 1998 Seattle Times article and its shorter version (side - by - side screencapture here for quick reference).

** Aside: Regarding what Oreskes characterizes a personal attacks against Santer: others have analyzed the situation, for example a 2008 Climate Resistance blog post which said (screencapture here to guide readers quicker to the passage deep within it)-RRB- about the 1997 Santer situation, «That's a personal attack?»

Especially if the statement was made in the much - lauded Columbia Journalism Review, verbatim statement below, red color for emphasis, screencapture here, full text here.

Screencapture here for posterity, in case someone decides to delete the video.

In a combined search using the location, Weilheim, Germany, and Oreskes» specific bit about what her presentation concerned, «research on a scientist named Gordon MacDonald,» material directly from the conference itself can be easily found (screencaptures here, here and here):

Not exact matches

Gelbspan's website account of this (full text here **) varies once again on what was supposed to be connected with climate change, but is at least more specific on which network employed the editor: [** 12/4/13 Author's note: Between the time of this 11/18/13 post and yesterday, the «CNN editor» paragraph shown in my prior screencapture link disappeared.

At this point in time, the «news» stories citing Davies» accusations have been done so many times, you'd actually have difficulty counting up his accusations (full text for that screencapture wipeout here) about the Koch brothers, «dark money», Exxon, or whatever other «enemy du jour» which happened to be popular at the time who supposedly funded lies from skeptic scientists.

Clicking on the Ozone.org link back in 2010 only caused a solitary and otherwise worthlessly vague page to open up (Yahoo Cache screencapture of it here), despite people such as Dr S. Fred Singer referring to Ozone Action at his Science and Environmental Policy Project site as a collection of very active environmentalists.

Two quotes from Psychology Today, in a June 23, 2015 piece titled «Anti-intellectualism Is Killing America», by the author of «Fighting Back the Right: Reclaiming America from the Attack on Reason», David Niose (first screencapture quote here):

About 6 months after Dykstra was laid off from CNN, he ended up as the Deputy Director of the Pew Charitable Trusts» Environment Group, where two key people from the old Ozone Action group, Brandon MacGillis and Kymberly Escobar, happened to work, as seen in this screencapture of Pew's Environment Group flyout menu, 1st, 3rd & last name there (online version here) Lest anyone forget, Ozone Action was the place that apparently helped Ross Gelbpsan's infamous «reposition global warming» accusation phrase get media traction.

He deleted my final comment — but not before fellow commenter Tom Harris got a screencapture of it (verbatim PDF file text here for easier reading).