The only drawback to replaying missions is that you'll have to listen to the same
scripted dialogue on certain occasions.
Not exact matches
So she uses a purchased
script for a plot outline, and then lets the kids create their own characters and
dialogue, relying
on improvisation to shake out the good ideas.
«Our current political system is based too much
on scripted messages and doesn't give many opportunities for this kind of honest
dialogue.»
You get what she's after — the rare indie comedy - drama to probe the subtext of a married woman's emotions — but her
script puts the subtext
on top, in the
dialogue, where it turns obvious.
With a a messy
script full of expository
dialogue, confusing motivations and plot holes, this uninteresting and generic movie is also only able to move forward by relying
on stupid characters who are no more a killer elite than a bunch of incompetent amateurs.
Julian Mitchell's
script tends to drag its feet, if not cut short a lot of expository depth, but it keeps consistent
on razor - sharp
dialogue, occasionally broken up by witty humor that puts a bit of kick in the slower spots, about as much as highlights in Brian Gilbert's direction which break up slow spells and sentimentality with occasions of color and effective thoughtfulness.
Unfortunately the show is just kinda dumb after that... the
scripted dialogue ranges from generic to awful; the characters are pantomimes, you know exactly whether they're good or bad right up front, and the show lacks any sort of organic development or growth, you just don't get into it like you would
on a better created and wriiten show.everything is so predictable that by the time big jim kills his nth person it's just sort of «meh whatever» time.
An impeccably directed character study with excellent performances and a top - notch
script mainly sustained
on a great
dialogue, offering us an insightful look at the creation of the most successful social network by a misanthropic young man who was unable to keep his only friend.
This movie is a mixed bag
on one side is Kevin Hart mostly improvising which give most of, if not all of the film's funny
dialogue, he also shares good chemistry with Ice Cube,
on the other side the
scripted jokes, are most of the time well lame, this fun to watch now than most of the movies are ****
Rodriguez does leave a certain creative stamp
on the movie; I suspect he took a whack at the
script, which bears evidence of his trademark pithy
dialogue.
He'd been working
on the
script for eight years and had been inspired to move into directing by his desire to make sure it was done right («I suddenly realized that I'd written a bunch of descriptions without much
dialogue to go along with it.
Thoughtless inconsistencies riddle the
script (also from Paquet - Brenner) who fails to match up the images he's presenting
on screen with the ham - strung
dialogue he's forced his able cast into saying.
Sorkin's
script, which is based
on the real - life Molly's memoir, has way too much
dialogue and too many voice - overs for the genre.
Featuring deliciously unsavory
dialogue, in an acid, brilliantly structured
script by Clifford Odets and Ernest Lehman, and noirish neon cityscapes from Oscar - winning cinematographer James Wong Howe, this cynical masterpiece is accompanied
on the Channel by a 1986 documentary about Mackendrick, a 1973 documentary about Howe, and a video interview with film critic and historian Neal Gabler.
(In one of many
on - the - nose lines of
dialogue in William Monahan's
script, Amy later observes about Jim, «You're one of those guys who started out with no problems at all, and now you have all of them.»)
The
script goes really light
on dialogue, especially in the first half of the movie.
There are occasional bursts of well - observed comedy in Comet «s largely insipid
script but they are too few between the dreary
dialogue and occasional badly judged observations
on subjects such as rape and eating disorders.
From the tightly
scripted dialogue — by turn sharp, harrowing & funny and without an ounce excess
on its bones — to the beautifully melancholic score by Carter Burwell and the powerhouse performances from a cast who've never been better, I fell in love with the entire movie, with every single breath - taking, nauseating, alarming, disturbing, uplifting scene, a fact made slightly more unusual given that I've tried — and failed
on repeated occasions — to watch and enjoy Martin McDonagh's back catalogue.
«So I have to make this for under $ 20 million, we have to cover a life in three long sequences with six recurring characters, it's a suffocating
script that's wall - to - wall
dialogue, and there's no indication
on how to do it?»
In his first directorial duty since «Into the Wild» (2007), Penn, recognized as a human - rights activist in Haiti, relies
on Erin Dignam's shallow, preachy
script, filled with whispered, often incoherent
dialogue.
I need hardly point out that the
script is terrible, both in terms of
dialogue and structure, the acting is submerged in ineptitude and borders
on pushing the progress of the art back about ten years, and the production values are as imaginative and convincing as those in a second - rate amusement park ride.
There's no way you could convince me that this movie started rolling film with a completed
script, as every character, scenario, and line of
dialogue feels entirely random, and most of them go
on interminably longer than they need to.
Most of the
scripts chosen for live reads are oriented very much around character and
dialogue; the event is just a bunch of people sitting
on stage, after all.
Paul Thomas Anderson for teaching me that it's ALL about the
script and if you have the right actors directors don't have to do anything
on set but be a fan, Lumet for his films and his book, a young directors» must read, Coppola for his courage in filmmaking, Steven Soderberg for refusing to ever be put in a box and pushing the form as far as he can, Kathryn Bigelow for giving masterclasses in action, James Cameron for Terminator 2 and prove big budget cinema can still be perfect cinema, Sean Penn for bringing his acting chops to directing, David Mamet for his
scripts and his
dialogue, Nolan for having more heart than most people seem to give him credit for (Memento, Rises, Inception and Interstellar all made me cry.)
Building a
script, based
on journals of shipwreck victims, William Broyles Jr. creates a skillful work in which events and emotions are brought to life with sparse
dialogue and little music; the first melodic sound is heard 90 minutes into the story.
Worse than that stale premise, is the
script's stilted
dialogue, which frequently sounds unnatural such as when Sheeni asks Nick to put some suntan lotion
on her back: with «Would you mind applying this to my exposed areas?»
Kormákur inexplicably attracts one of the most impressive casts of the year — actually, it does make sense: he needed a talented group to elevate a dire
script, people who could lend gravitas to
dialogue kindergarten kids might have written — to flesh out this bird's eye view
on a disastrous weekend
on the mountain.
The reason why most who worked
on the first film did not return is rumored to be due to inflexibility in
script changes, and their fears appear to be justified, as what ends up appearing
on screen is shockingly poor, with nothing in the way of character development, plot cohesiveness, or passable
dialogue.
If you watch the film, look at each scene, and listen to the
dialogue, Fantastic Four was terrible from Trank's awful
script on.
The
script is more like an outline, with the actors creating the
dialogue on the spot, and the first take usually... Read More»
Supported by fine performances and the year's sharpest
script, CAPTAIN FANTASTIC awakens an inner
dialogue in audiences about the way we live our lives based
on societal influences.
Supported by fine performances (both big and small) and the year's sharpest
script, CAPTAIN FANTASTIC awakens an inner
dialogue in audiences about the way we live our lives based
on societal influences.
He does have a few good scenes in «The Gambler», but an unfocused
script that relies way too much
on dialogue results in «The Gambler» being one of the holiday season's weakest releases.
On the whole, Haneke is pretty candid, discussing some of his bedrock rules for filmmaking (never deviate from the
script, allow no unmotivated camera movement, put important
dialogue off screen).
Worst - case scenario: The initial trailer for the film relies more
on scatological humor — one prominent gag involves a music box being stuck in a supporting character's butt — than sparkling
dialogue, raising the question of whether Fey and Poehler's chemistry is enough to overcome even the dumbest
script.
He agreed to purchase the rights for Bong, who started writing the early drafts of the
script and enlisting American playwright and screenwriter Kelly Masterson (Before the Devil Knows You're Dead) to work
on the English
dialogue.
Johnson spent many years sending out his
script to anyone he could that would read it, and although most that would read it loved it, none of them were willing to take a chance
on such an ambitious screenplay done by an inexperienced director, especially when making the
script work with such strange
dialogue.
However,
on the most part, a crisp
script with some great
dialogue, helped move the film at a good pace, never stopping it from becoming tedious.
Far more than in their
scripts for «Legally Blonde» and «10 Things That I Hate About You,» screenwriters Karen McCullah Lutz and Kirsten Smith reveal a precise ear for
dialogue that turns words back
on themselves, and especially the sort of talk that young women say to one another in private: In perfect Shelley - talk, she exclaims, «My heart is pounding like a nail!»
But for an incident that took about a minute or two, expanding the story to feature length is a stretch, and Blyskal's
script doesn't know where to focus, and features eye - roll inducing, plainly
on - the - nose
dialogue.
Instead of relying
on maudlin music cues and a barrage of heavy - handed
dialogue spelling out how its elfin lead is destined to do great things, director Peter Chelsom has faith enough in his
script (written by Charles Leavitt) and his cast to allow them to strike emotional chords
on their own — and the lead actors, in particular, succeed marvelously.
Heavy
on dialogue, this movie's intelligent
script pits mathematical theories against personality traits, and questions the definition of mad versus eccentric.
On one hand, the
script does include some clever
dialogue, good one - liners and smart situations.
Her wordsmith skills land her a job writing
scripts for propaganda films that aim to lift morale and instill pride While initially tasked with inventing women's
dialogue — dubbed «the slop» — she is soon recruited to take the lead
on penning a civilian rescue - mission adventure featuring patriotic twin sisters as heroes.
Similarly, we've spent much of these last few weeks gradually losing assurance that the beautifully realized characters, brisk rising action, incisive
dialogue, and political resonance of both Greta Gerwig's
script for Lady Bird and Jordan Peele's for Get Out will
on their merits be able to stave off Martin McDonagh's work
on Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri.
And the
dialogue itself — the thing Crowe made his name
on in his great, early films «Say Anything...,» «Jerry Maguire» and «Almost Famous» — so frequently strains for his signature poignancy that it feels like a parody of a Crowe
script.
I was quiet, yes, and made sure to direct comments only to the people
on either side of me (both of whom I know), but it has been a long while since I've seen a movie that asked for — nay — demanded ridicule for its refusal to admit to its campy premise and instead decides to play its cheap, ineffective thrills, cheesy
dialogue, and cliché - ridden
script with complete, hopeless sincerity.
As well as testing his ideas over two shorts, Whitfield was in continual back - and - forth with his leads
on the
dialogue, and the result was a
script impressive enough to lure better - known actors such as Jason Isaacs (Lucius Malfoy from the Harry Potter films) and Paprika Steen (Danish veteran of Dogme films Festen and The Idiots)
on board.
Although the
script encompasses issues of love, life, and death, not much
dialogue gets spent
on the usual deep discussion associated with such topics.
One can almost feel her projecting to reach the cheap seats and it's likely that the exposition - heavy
script, filled with clunky,
on - the - nose
dialogue, would also work better
on stage.