Sentences with phrase «scriptura monumentalis»

In addition to this series of granite works Nauman produced fifty prints with the same phrase, «PARTIAL TRUTH», rendered in the same scriptura monumentalis font, for the Aldrich Museum of Contemporary Art on the occasion of their 1997 exhibition Bruce Nauman: 1985 — 1996: Drawings, Prints, and Related Works.

A poetic performance piece exploring duality, SCRIPTURA VITAE stars famed Japanese actress Miho Nikaido, best known for her role in the Japanese cult classic film «Tokyo Decadence», alongside Butoh performer and dancer Maki Shinagawa.

This attitude, espoused by Scripture itself and key to the Reformation conviction of Sola Scriptura, underpins historic Evangelical belief and practice.

Butterfly species in Northern California, such as Pyrgus scriptura (shown), may suffer spillover effects of local neonicotinoid pesticide use.

It is ironic that the Reformation principle of sola scriptura, much misunderstood, has led to the neglect among Protestants of older biblical commentaries, even those of the reformers themselves.

A past post delves more deeply into my own questions regarding sola Scriptura.

An approach of sola scriptura makes neither historical nor theological sense.

So, here's my question for you: Do you find yourself questioning the notion of sola Scriptura / the sole authority of the Bible?

It is only the Protestant dogma of Sola Scriptura (scripture alone) that has led to the rancorous debate between creationists and science.

Could it be that you need to hear «sola scriptura» in your heart?

Kevin, If you really want to see whats NOT in the bible, here is a man made tradition for you: SOLA - SCRIPTURA

But it is one thing just to claim that theological disagreements (such as sola scriptura) are not the only problem; it's another to refute with arguments Gregory's meticulously argued claim that this did, in fact, constitute a serious problem.

It was the way of sola fides, faith alone, which he found through Scriptura sola, only through the words of Scripture, and not through Canon Law or conventions.

It was based on a recurrence to the Reformation appeal to sola scriptura.

If we sit under Barth as a teacher, does this mean we have to abandon sola scriptura by replacing Scripture with Barth's ideas?

It will differ also from what many Christians say, especially those whose ideas of sola scriptura lead them to exclude other sources of understanding and knowledge.

If you don't have tradition, all you have is «sola scriptura» (really «sola biblia») which means «whatever I want.»

Moltmann continued the tradition of sola scriptura, pointing out the importance of futurity in the Bible.

-- I'm afraid that until the church recognizes sola scriptura, they will always be bound up in traditions that «have no connection to the heart of the Gospel.»

The dreams and visions violate sola scriptura and were condemned by every evangelical group less than 150 years ago.

Protestants grow up in a very different ecclesial environment than do Catholics, and doctrines like sola Scriptura and sola fide are ingrained from an early age, so much so that when they learn Catholics do not also hold to them, they just know that Catholicism must be false.

Mr. Leithart claims that sola Scriptura is an epistemological doctrine answering the question, From what source do I learn how I can commune with God?

Abraham is better on the Reformers because of his awareness that their actual theological practice is often superior to their sola scriptura polemical excesses, but even here he at times sounds more like a prosecuting attorney than a well - informed and fair - minded scholar.

Under the slogan «sola Scriptura,» Protestants translated the Bible into the vernacular, and with the help of the press distributed Bibles to an unprecedented number of people.

Thus the sola of sola Scriptura is epistemologically untenable, no matter where one stands in the hermeneutical wars of postmodernity.

For them, the «sola Scriptura principle is meant to shape engagement of the catholic tradition rather than to exclude it.»

This problem seems to be an inescapable consequence of the principle of sola Scriptura, which the Reformed catholic theologians staunchly defend, albeit in sophisticated form.

Return to sola scriptura seems regressive in an ecumenical age for whom Scripture is primary but whose available resources for theological interpretation are more encompassing than mere Scripture [Leroy T. Howe].

To call this a return to sola scriptura is a misnomer.

I suppose these critical remarks boil down to the following questions: Can the sola Scriptura principle coexist with a view of the Church that is truly anchored «deep in history»?

The principal of sola scriptura and the rejection of the Church's teaching authority in the end, he thinks, led to a «market of values» in which all certainties dissolved.

Unless we drastically reshape both our theology and our entire institutional church life so that this fact becomes as central to evangelical theology and evangelical institutional programs as it is in Scripture, we will demonstrate to the world that our verbal commitment to sola scriptura is a dishonest ideological support for an unjust, materialistic status quo.

1500 years before the idea of «sola scriptura» was invented.

Sola gratia and sola scriptura were the two key watchwords of the Protestant Reformation.

To say one is an evangelical is to embrace the Reformation teaching on sola gratia and sola scriptura.

On the Sunday morning before this year's South Carolina primary, Dr. Carl Broggi, the pastor of Community Bible Church in Beaufort, turned over his pulpit — emblazoned with the Protestant watchword «sola scriptura,» to GOP presidential candidate Ted Cruz.

And it is misappropriated by the self - appointed Protestant guardians of the sola scriptura who behave as if the Bible were their possession and preserve its letter without its spirit.

Catholicism doesn't proclaim itself to be sola scriptura (solely from scripture).

In their opposition to Protestantism, Tridentine and post-Tridentine theologians sought to defend the revelatory role of tradition and the magisterium over against the sola Scriptura (Scripture alone) emphasis of Protestant Christianity.

When we cry «sola scriptura», what we really mean is «sola (my particular understanding of the) scriptura».

The «widespread misunderstanding» of sola scriptura among Evangelicals turns out, then, not to be a misunderstanding at all.

First, the Evangelical signatories fudge on their supposed bedrock principle of sola scriptura.

I've been doing a lot of reading on church history recently (for that book I'm writing... Close Your Church for Good), and it constantly amazes me how much of what we do «in church» is a result of tradition (so much for Sola Scriptura) which developed 1000 - 1500 years ago as a result of a politician or priest who wanted more power or more money.

I also think that since there are so many different ways to translate and understand the written scriptures, «sola scriptura» is really not as objective as it might initially seem.

It is deeply ironic that the Reformation should have been accompanied by the virtually prophetic painting of the North, and yet the iconoclastic tendency implicit in the very motto Sola Scriptura would close out the era of great Protestant painting before the middle of the 16th century.

But it's a long way from Sola Scriptura.

For many years I have struggled with deep seated doubts about Protestantism which clings so blindly to the Reformation's Sola Scriptura overreaction which gained its foothold at a time when «enlightenment» was only just beginning to teach us how to sign our names other than with an «X».

As a son of the Reformation, sola scriptura is always the source of theology, not life - situations.

As the Church does not accept sola scriptura as a valid argument for teachings and truth.

Doc, if Catholics believed in sola scriptura your request for a specific scriptural passage would be a valid one.