Return to sola
scriptura seems regressive in an ecumenical age for whom Scripture is primary but whose available resources for theological interpretation are more encompassing than mere Scripture [Leroy T. Howe].
Not exact matches
I also think that since there are so many different ways to translate and understand the written scriptures, «sola
scriptura» is really not as objective as it might initially
seem.
This problem
seems to be an inescapable consequence of the principle of sola
Scriptura, which the Reformed catholic theologians staunchly defend, albeit in sophisticated form.