The daily routine of the orthodox Hindu is probably much more determined by some part of
his scriptures than that of the people of the West by the Bible, or for that matter than that of any other people by its scripture, save only the Moslems.
Not exact matches
That is one
of the reasons why west decided to take in to becoming religious rather
than secular since only with that the tension might be reduced and not be considered as infidels attacking Islamic lands but as
people of the
scriptures!
The results in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries was that the faith to which
people were called was often more the objective belief that the
scriptures were completely true
than the deeply personal assurance
of God's forgiveness
of their sins and the resulting freedom.
The
scripture people want to misquote about not being tempted with more
than you can bear in 1 Corinthians doesn't say that at all in my study
of it.
And you know what, after my revelation
of GRACE last year which absolutely set me free from «performance Christianity» God told me that, regardless
of what «
scriptures»
people threw at me, what He was telling me directly to my heart, that He has made me perfectly righteous by the blood
of His son regardless
of what I do or don't do, I must trust His voice in my heart, more
than the printed «Word» which has been bended, bent, misterpreted and mistaught.
I suppose, being raised «unchurched,» I «read» the
Scriptures a bit differently
than many «
people of the Book.»
Psalm 10: 3 - 4 — This talks about the wicked men, how they do nt have God in their hearts or in their minds, which is a fine piece
of scripture but it can hardly be used for either myself or the maker
of the video since we both seem to advocate a deep and personal relationship with the Lord rather
than letting a group
of «religious»
people ruin it for you.
I value and respect the views
of people like yourself, and numerous others, who hold to the various «Less
than inerrant» views about
Scripture.
If one lets the no - inherent - free - will interpretation
of the less
than 0.5 %
of the
Scriptures set the precedence on what the word of God says about man's free will, then a person is forced to do some absurd reasoning / interpretation of the majority of scriptures that imply that man has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, promises
Scriptures set the precedence on what the word
of God says about man's free will, then a
person is forced to do some absurd reasoning / interpretation
of the majority
of scriptures that imply that man has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, promises
scriptures that imply that man has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, promises and gifts.
The SBC would be better advised to get to know
people as they are rather
than try to force them into some mold that conforms to a pet misreading
of a single verse
of scripture.
Please don't listen to these
people on here they have so many different views and ideas
of their own but don't listen to them they have closed their heart to God and are doing Satans work
of misleading
people away from the Almighty they look for men who like to have their ears tickled so don't take mine our anyone else's word for it look it up for your self history attests to the bible as true and The writings
of Moses is far older
than anything they have ever found thats right Moses wrote the first parts in the bible 3,500 years ago The
scriptures weren't inspired by Pagan stories Pagan stories was inspired by actual events just like those in the bible because if you notice that a lot
of the stories found in the bible have a lot to do about
people worshipping false Gods.
Western Christianity has become more deistic
than theistic and
Scriptures that reveal a metaphysics
of Divine Transcendence and a deterministic legal agenda rather
than a love story
of God's relationship with the
people S / He has chosen to prepare to become sacraments
of Divine Love in the world.
The fact that the Bible lends itself to competing interpretations should be cause for celebration rather
than dismay, for these competing interpretations among
people of faith who love and value
Scripture help bring us into relationship with one another and with God.
Likewise, the Presbyterian Church (USA)'s changes to its policy took place over a much longer time
than Azumah names, involved
persons holding many positions left undescribed, and came about not because the denomination chose to ignore the
Scriptures but because over time, many
of us became convinced that there are theologically and historically faithful ways
of reading the
Scriptures that find space for contemporary understandings
of homosexuality.
He defines theology as reflection on the faith
of the
people of God — a second - order activity that provides useful models rather
than the scientific deduction
of intellectual truth from a mother lode
of truth in
scripture.
So for
people of other religions following
scriptures other
than Quran, Allah has pre-planned punishment.
Some
people might distinguish between them more sharply
than others, but both processes involve a major movement affecting our subjective limitations and, therefore, they deeply influence our interpretation
of Scripture and tradition.
And while
Scripture can be used to lead us toward the truth that all
people are created equal,
Scripture itself seems to lean more on the side
of supporting slavery
than speaking out against it.
The sin
of pride, for example, is rampant in Christianity, and according to
Scripture, is much more serious
of a sin
than some
of the others many Christians like to condemn in other
people.
Janet i think what you have said is quite insightful and you are right and there is another meaning to Go and sin no more and that speaks to me
of repentence making a decision to Follow Christ the one who saves.The words Go and sin no more is referring to a continual ongoinging process
of living for Christ rather
than dying in our sins daily there is no comparison.I thought that was awesome pointing the law back to all
of us for we all have sinned and the judgement is death but Jesus came that we might have life in its fullness.Many
people only see the adulterer when she portrays who we are as sinners that he came to save all
of us sin is sin and the punishment is death so again you are quite right
people use the
scriptures to judge and that was never Jesus intention.I hope that helps when someone uses that
scripture incorrectly and you can you use it like Jesus did to point it back at those who judge i hope that helps.brentnz
All I was saying was that IF you think it is a sin, we should still love and accept LGBT
people, just as we love and accept
people who lie, eat too much, drink too much, are lazy, are proud, etc, all
of which are clearly sins (and are talked about in
Scripture way more
than homosexuality).
I believe that when
people espouse the values
of a mother or wife exclusively being a homemaker, they are longing for a perceived simpler and easier time as opposed to truth, elevating a nostalgic look at motherhood from the standpoint
of the post-war American dream
of the white, upper - middle - class rather
than Scripture.
He recalled the solid achievements which were now to be seen in Ernestine Saxony, the results
of the Visitation,
of the preaching
of a theology
of faith and the circulation
of the Little Catechism, and the German New Testament: «The young
people, both boys and girls, grow up so well instructed in the Catechism and the
Scriptures that I am deeply moved when I see that young boys and girls can pray, believe, and speak more
of God and Christ
than they ever could in the monasteries, foundations, and schools
of bygone days, or even
of our day.
Making disciples means way more
than filling
people's heads with expert knowledge
of Scripture.
When a question is raised which for most
people demands careful thought and responsible personal decision,
people like that will very often simply quote a passage from the
Scriptures, frequently in no way directly relevant to the matter under discussion and when relevant only valuable in the context
of another age and under other conditions
than those which are ours today.
It is equally easy and false to take a docetic view
of revelation: to suppose that the content
of the
scriptures, for example, is, just simply, the thoughts
of God, the human writers contributing no more
than a pen for God to write them down with; or to imagine that a
person or a group
of people or an institution can, as it were, throw a switch from time to time and become a transmitter
of revelation from an external divine source: a group
of bishops, for instance, when assembled in council, or a pope when defining a dogma ex cathedra.
More
than one
scripture indicates that faith is a gift from God — yes,
people are commanded and encouraged to believe, but the «natural man does not receive the things
of God...»
In the present day situation, the concept
of «sexual equality» which is explained in the canonical gospels can make a special influence upon the
people than all other
scriptures.
Even Walter Brueggemann values the insights and perspectives
of other
people, especially those whose gender, race, or socioeconomic status means they see
Scripture differently
than he.
Scripture even teaches irony, as when God sarcastically addresses Jonah, who is complaining about the collapse
of his bean vine: «Should I not spare Nineveh, this great city, wherein are more
than six score thousand
persons that can not discern between their right hand and their left hand, and also much cattle?»
This is no different
than some young
people going to college and leaving their brains at the door and swallowing evolutionary theory and purposely rejecting the obvious
of what creation clearly shows except this is leaving your brain at the door
of theology school and accepting man's opinion over what is clearly stated in the holy
scriptures, and then teaching others false doctrine.
The flood was encouraged by the fact that Luther always disowned any wish to impose a universal style or any norms other
than those
of Scripture and, while always willing to advise, his advice often included the suggestion that
people should work things out themselves as appropriate locally.
So the only way to proceed is to agree that the gospel includes way more information
than what a
person has to believe in order to receive eternal life, and then try to determine from
Scripture how much
of the gospel must be beleived in order to receive eternal life.
Part
of the difficulty with the word «forgiveness» is that modern English speakers have put a slightly different twist on the word
than how
people would have understood the equivalent Greek or Hebrew words in the
Scriptures when they were written.
However, given that the subject is, to say the least, touchy, the fact that this film was even made is worthy
of at least some kudos to Maher for having the guts to potentially offend the vast majority
of people in the country, and perhaps the world, with his expression
of doubt in their beliefs and his own belief that, though many individuals have found great benefit from the ancient
scriptures, religion ultimately does more harm
than good when looking at it in its totality from a global historical scale.