Another 1974 American Electric Power ad criticized EPA for encouraging the use of pollution
scrubbers on coal plants.
Studies in the United States show an increase in water pollution after installation of
scrubbers on coal plants.
Not exact matches
We now have
scrubbers on coal and oil fueled power
plants because high concentrations of SO2 resulted in health problems for humans and certain trees.
Crank up the
coal - fired power
plants with high - sulphur
coal and turn the
scrubbers on and off as needed to regulate the temperature.
Although many
plant managers avoided using their SO (2)
scrubbers in the past, recent evidence, based
on a series of field interviews conducted by the author, suggests that managers of
coal power
plants now have incentives to operate their
scrubbers properly....
With a
scrubber in place, a
plant using high - sulfur
coal can reduce its need to buy and surrender SO2 emissions permits by 90 % or more compared to a
plant using the same fuel without a
scrubber, making Illinois Basin
coal much more competitive, especially against Central Appalachia which previously could rely
on its low sulfur content as a competitive advantage.
There were a few papers published at that time
on the issue of particle pollution (mostly from
coal plants which did not yet have
scrubbers) blocking out some of the incoming sunlight and exerting a short - term cooling influence.
On December 1, 2009, Progress announced that by the end of 2017 it would permanently close all of its North Carolina
coal plants without sulfur dioxide
scrubbers.
On December 1, 2009, Progress Energy announced that by 2017 it will be shutting down all of its
coal - fired power
plants that do not have flue - gas desulfurization controls (
scrubbers).