Not exact matches
The only other comment I'd have is that whilst he meets a much higher
standard of scientific approach than the snake oil dressed as financial advice elsewhere, the core testing methods used are opaque and (as far as I can tell) not peer
reviewed or made available for
scrutiny.
For now, University
of Texas at Austin admission policies will go on to a «strict
standard scrutiny»
review within the Fifth District Court, based in New Orleans.
Peer
review is only ever meant to offer a certain level
of scrutiny of a paper, ensuring that accepted
standards are maintained.
Well, peer -
reviewed studies — especially those that have withstood the test
of prolonged
scrutiny, or which have generated new insights and new investigations — are the gold
standard.
The continued focus on enforcing the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act on conduct by affiliated entities
of US corporations impacts our investigations work, as we know that ethics issues that arise need to be viewed not just as potential violations
of local law and not just as local employment - or labor - issues, but need to be
reviewed and addressed with the
scrutiny applicable in the US under our corporate ethics
standard.