So instead of having pro
se people and trying to work around their lack of knowledge of the rules of evidence or their lack of knowledge at the various levels of procedures you have to operate in that court, we've got that exactly backwards.
Sam Glover: Maybe you're conflicted on this because of your status as a liaison, but do you feel like the courts there are doing a better job of welcoming pro
se people into the system?
Are
the se people out of their mind??? Petss are by nature natural, dogs ans cats exist in this world and its up to the people to decide if they have aplace in their home... not to the goverment.
Not exact matches
No representation or warranty, express or implied, is or will be made by
SES, its directors, officers or advisors or any other
person as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information or opinions contained in this presentation, and any reliance you place on them will be at your sole risk.
This method is effective, per
se, but
people undoubtedly fall out of the sales funnel when they have to leave Facebook to visit a different site or when there is too long of a gap from the initial response that made the viewer want to buy the item and the time it takes to complete the transaction.
Even
people who didn't predict a crash, per
se, had a vague sense that something was terribly wrong.
As I said, I don't think
people are arguing against the site, per
se, but against the ideology / philosophy that requires gender segregation.
Societyvs said, on February 10th, 2010 at 11:21 am... in this case we have backwards
people (in America — not Israel per
se)---------- Israel, no kidding!
That is the EXACT revulsion gay
people feel for hetero
se.
13A -6-67: (a) A
person commits the crime of
se ual abuse in the second degree if:... (2) He, being 19 years old or older, subjects another
person to
se ual contact who is less than 16 years old, but more than 12 years old.
Yet this is not the case... in this case we have backwards
people (in America — not Israel per
se) holding these
people out because they are «different» (and that is what it actually boils down to).
There are one type of Christian, Angry Christians, who consistently feel the need to mock other
peoples se xuality, and post incessantly any time someone mentions the word gay.
If you use other
people se - xually, there are STDs and angry spouses and jail.
In the second you say most
people can not
se god anywhere.
The simply fact is most HI - V is caused by
people have
se - x with multiple partners whether they are married or not.
I know I would be very upset if my husband were to cheat on me by having
se - x with another
person, and he has said the same about my infidelity, because we have an agreement between us that such behaviour is not ok for us.
Perhaps an indication that the religious are far more concerned with regulating
people's
se - x lives than in what
people actually believe?
That was kind of my point the
people are choosing to ignore church policy about
se - x with multiple partners but its the churches fault they can't choose to use a condom.
Not because He needs us per
se, but in His mercy He chose to work out His plan through His
people — so to fulfill His plan He needs us to step up: to give of our money, our time, but most of all our heart felt devotion to ALL He is doing in His world.
Since atheism per
se takes no stand on the killing of innocent
people, when an sociopathic atheist is responsible for the deaths of
people, be it one
person or a million, it does not represent any kind of inconsistency with his status as an atheist.
-- The American Psychological Association states «there are probably many reasons for a
person's
se - xual orientation and the reasons may be different for different
people», and says most
people's
se - xual orientation is determined at an early age.
Don't you think it's just a «wee» bit pompous and arrogant to think you, of all
people, think you KNOW what the creator of 600
se «xtillion stars «requires».
besides, since no one has proved this god creature to truly exist the idea of caring about this one
person as if he matters or even has a point to exist is beyond me and further proves the willingness of the ma $
ses to be sheep instead of shepards!
realbuckyball — «
People who say
se «xuality is «chosen» are saying THEY chose to be straight, and THAT means they are all saying they could have gone either way.»
Are you honestly saying you don't know the difference between seeing someone and thinking they are attractive and seeing someone and having mental
se - xual images with that
person?!?!
They would rather be under a party and president that promotes hate than to
se gay
people happy because they can get married... GET A LIFE....
The sin would be having
se - xual thoughts about that
person before marriage.
People who say
se «xuality is «chosen» are saying THEY chose to be straight, and THAT means they are all saying they could have gone either way.
i accept all
people as human regardless of race, creed, national origin or
se - xual orientation.
And the product of this ordained
se - xual encounter was one Ishmael, who is considered the antecedent of the Arabic
people, from which Islam was fabricated.
The problem may not be with rights per
se, whose articulation is invaluable to our conception of modern republicanism (and may even help more fully articulate what is true about Christian morality), but with an interpretation that takes rights as the whole of moral discourse and therefore, understands the abstract Lockean individual to be a comprehensive account of the human
person.
Well, they sure do have way more interest in the
se x lives of gay
people than those of us who aren't h0m0phobes.
Everyone with a
se - xual organ can theoretically play with it, rub it against other things including other
people and their
se - x organs and, as long as they're consenting adults, there is nothing illegal about it in the slightest.
It is the religious
people who can not stand the idea of
se - x at all, even though they like to say big families are okay.
Also, even if sins aren't the issue at the JSC per
se, there's no doubt sin would keep a
person from serving and at least indirectly lead to forfeiture of rewards & shame.
And of course a business can choose to be dismissive of the ho mo
se xual lifestyle, and
people who know their stance are free to take their business elsewhere.
In Luther's words, we are «twisted in upon ourselves» (incurvatus in
se, he says, is the condition of each
person); we deprive ourselves of the good which in principle is ours because we prefer cheaper and easier superficial «goods.»
It is office rather than authority per
se that gives access to power over a diversity of
people.
Pliny added that Christianity attracted
persons of all societal ranks, all ages, both
se xes, and from both the city and the country.
For example,
people reading this exchange with a view to assessing the validity of Madden's criticisms of my position and the soundness of my rebuttal are acting on one of practical reason's per
se nota first principles» namely, that intellectual understanding of matters such as those under discussion is something worth having and expending time and effort to achieve.
Explain where God is in the parents that are told to reject their ho mo
se xu al children, or in the huge sanctuary full of
people that spend their time gossiping about and insulting one another.
people are born ho - mo -
se - xual.
Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves; for ye saw no manner of form on the day that the Lord spoke unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire; lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image in the form of any figure, the likeness of male or female... and lest thou lift thine eyes unto heaven and when thou
seest the sun and the moon and the stars, even the whole host of heaven, thou be drawn away and worship them and serve them, which the Lord thy God hath allotted unto all the
peoples under the whole heaven» (Deut.
In mentioning the activities of mankind before the flood, Jesus is not condemning them per
se, for from them half the
people are taken to the kingdom.
Also, for the record, the OP's handle notwithstanding, when
people make modern versions of this argument, they don't cite belief vs disbelief in heaven and hell per
se, but belief and disbelief in god as the critical matter, heaven and hell being the pay offs.
«Hoy canto al Dios del Pueblo en mi guitarra, un canto de mujer que
se libera» («Today I sing to the God of my
people with my guitar, I sing a song of a woman who liberates herself»), sings Rosa Marta Zárate.
I'm seeing a lot of comments where
people accept that evolution per
se occurs, but either deny that there is evidence of life arising by the theory of evolution by natural selection or just want to treat creationism as equal to that theory in the classroom.
The real purpose of Jesus doing miracles had nothing to do with
people, per
se.
Straight
people have stupid, unprotected
se / x too.
Let is be honest, gayness and gay marriage belong to
people which usually have left all the ways of virtue, not only concerning
se - xuality, but concerning all matters of morality.