Delayed regrowth of arctic
sea ice cools the planet.
Not exact matches
This global
cooling led to an expansion of the West Antarctic
Ice Sheet that caused global
sea level to fall exposing many of the Maldives» reefs.
Subsequent, unusually large and frequent eruptions of other volcanoes, as well as
sea -
ice / ocean feedbacks persisting long after the aerosols have been removed from the atmosphere, may have prolonged the
cooling through the 1700s.
This current forms off the coast of Antarctica as cold winds off the
ice sheet
cool the
sea surface.
Simulations using a climate model showed that several large, closely spaced eruptions could have
cooled the Northern Hemisphere enough to spark
sea -
ice growth and the subsequent feedback loop.
The intensified monsoons created a positive feedback cycle, promoting more global
cooling, more
sea ice and even stronger precipitation, culminating in the spread of huge glaciers across the Northern Hemisphere.»
New simulations show that several large, closely spaced eruptions (and not decreased solar radiation) could have
cooled the Northern Hemisphere enough to spark
sea -
ice growth and a subsequent feedback loop
A mysterious, centuries - long
cool spell, dubbed the Little
Ice Age, appears to have been caused by a series of volcanic eruptions and sustained by sea ice, a new study indicat
Ice Age, appears to have been caused by a series of volcanic eruptions and sustained by
sea ice, a new study indicat
ice, a new study indicates.
«Ocean whitening and the
sea ice recovery achieved in this way could lead to wetter and milder winter conditions in the southwestern United States and
cooler conditions in the eastern United States,» Cvijanovic explains.
New research from Carnegie's Ivana Cvijanovic (now at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) and Ken Caldeira, as well as Douglas MacMartin of Caltech, shows that while an incredibly large effort could, in principle, restore vast amounts of
sea ice by this method, it would not result in substantial
cooling.
McCusker, K. E., Fyfe, J. C. & Sigmond, M. Twenty - five winters of unexpected Eurasian
cooling unlikely due to arctic
sea ice loss.
A positive feedback loop was established, with
cooling leading to
ice sheet growth and
sea level lowering, which encouraged further
ice sheet growth and
cooling [26, 27].
The volume of
sea ice left at the end of the summer melt season seems to vary more from year to year than had perhaps been previously appreciated; after declining for several years,
sea ice volume shot up after the unusually
cool summer of 2013, the data revealed.
Beckwith, as a member of AMEG, the Arctic Methane Emergency Group, also says we must
cool the Arctic enough to preserve the remaining
sea ice.
Sea ice, with its bright white surface, reflects solar energy back into the atmosphere, helping to
cool surface temperatures.
Paul disagrees, partly due to loss of
sea ice, and so no latent heat /
cooling, leading to non-linear melting.
Prediction methods for the
sea ice minima range from ad - hoc guesses to model predictions, from statistical analyses to water -
cooler speculation in the blogosphere.
Does the pattern of change (warming raises the equilibrium temperature,
cooling decreases it), indicate a negative feedback on
sea level change (e.g. as land
ice melts it requires a little warmer temperature to continue to melt further land
ice... and vice versa??).
Numerous denier arguments involving slight fluctuations in the global distribution of warmer vs
cooler sea surface areas as supposed explanations of climate change neglect all the energy that goes into ocean heat content, melting large
ice deposits and so forth.
For Fred Singer, a climatologist at the University of Virginia and another co-author, the current warming «trend is simply part of a natural cycle of climate warming and
cooling that has been seen in
ice cores, deep
sea sediments and stalagmites... and published in hundreds of papers in peer reviewed journals.»
Geoengineering proposals fall into at least three broad categories: 1) managing atmospheric greenhouse gases (e.g., ocean fertilization and atmospheric carbon capture and sequestration), 2)
cooling the Earth by reflecting sunlight (e.g., putting reflective particles into the atmosphere, putting mirrors in space to reflect the sun's energy, increasing surface reflectivity and altering the amount or characteristics of clouds), and 3) moderating specific impacts of global warming (e.g., efforts to limit
sea level rise by increasing land storage of water, protecting
ice sheets or artificially enhancing mountain glaciers).
If this year and summer are
cooler than last, and that is not a certainty, then this summer's Arctic
sea ice melt will be less extensive than last year.
Thus the reluctant conclusion of Wadhams, and other members of the Arctic Methane Emergency Group, AMEG [3], is that drastic emergency measures including geoengineering must be taken as soon as possible in order to
cool the Arctic rapidly and minimise the risk of
sea ice collapse and methane feedback.
Its effects were relatively modest: perhaps 1 Celsius degree of
cooling (1.8 F), a fall in
sea level of approximately 30 centimeters (1 foot), and marginal increases in
sea ice and terrestrial glaciers as well as descents in European montane «snow lines» of perhaps 100 meters.
The study starts with observations of eroding
ice sheets spreading,
cooler freshwater at both ends of the planet and geological hints of tempestuous conditions toward the end of the Eemian, that last interval between
ice ages when global temperatures and
seas were higher than now.
If the heat transport by the Atlantic thermohaline circulation suddenly increases for some reason (we'll come to that), Greenland suddenly gets warm (an effect amplified by receding
sea ice cover of the
seas near Greenland) and Antarctica starts to
cool.
The good news is that even with a reduction to less than 50 % of the current amount of
sea ice the
ice will not reach a point of no return: a level where the
ice no longer can regenerate itself even if the climate was to return to
cooler temperatures.
In the meantime, there are lots of signals (global SAT, Arctic
sea ice, strat
cooling, Hadley cell expansion (perhaps)....)
He has been insisting that the world has been
cooling since 2007, his «proof» being that 2007 was the year the Arctic
sea ice reached its minimum and has been since «recovering.»
Nick Barnes: Looks like I'm about to lose our November 07 bet on
sea ice minimum unless things
cool down fast up there.
The globe is
cooling, the
sea level is dropping, the
ice is accumulating and weather patterns are changing because the globe is
cooling.
When the polar regions
cool the amount of
sea ice increases.
The paper uses evidence and modeling to explain how the sun - blocking impact from a 50 - year stretch of unusually intense eruptions of four tropical volcanoes caused sufficient
cooling to produce a long - lasting shift in the generation and migration of Arctic Ocean
sea ice, with substantial consequences for the Northern Hemisphere climate that lasted centuries and left a deep imprint on European history.
1 (kim) Watch the Argos bouys for dropping
sea temperatures, the RSS and UAH satellite thermometers for
cooling tropospheric temperatures, Bob B's links for
sea level dropping, and cryosphere for polar
ice anomalies.
So, the THC reduces, the North
Sea cools by radiation and
ice reflection increases.
Burning all fossil fuels, if the CO2 is released into the air, would destroy creation, the planet with its animal and plant life as it has existed for the past several thousand years, the time of civilization, the Holocene, the period of relative climate stability, warm enough to keep
ice sheets off North America and Eurasia, but
cool enough to maintain Antarctic and Greenland
ice, and thus a stable
sea level.
An example of a positive feedback is Arctic
sea ice melting, which exposes the ocean, which absorbs far more energy than the snow and
ice did, causing the ocean to heat (or the air to
cool?).
The Arctic
sea ice, for instance, has timescales of around 5 years to a decade, and so a collapse of summer
ice cover could conceivably be reversed in a «
cooling world» after only a decade or so (interactions with the Arctic ocean stratification may make that take a little longer though).
A radiocarbon - dated box core in the Sargasso
Sea shows that sea surface temperature was approximately 1 °C cooler than today approximately 400 years ago (the Little Ice Age) and 1700 years ago, and approximately 1 °C warmer than today 1000 years ago (the Medieval Warm Perio
Sea shows that
sea surface temperature was approximately 1 °C cooler than today approximately 400 years ago (the Little Ice Age) and 1700 years ago, and approximately 1 °C warmer than today 1000 years ago (the Medieval Warm Perio
sea surface temperature was approximately 1 °C
cooler than today approximately 400 years ago (the Little
Ice Age) and 1700 years ago, and approximately 1 °C warmer than today 1000 years ago (the Medieval Warm Period).
I also wonder if the antarctic ocean waters
cool more in the summer because of a lack of
sea ice.
«Because of its reflectivity, Arctic
sea ice is a critical
cooling component of the earth's climate system; its loss will mean a much hotter world,» added Mr. Pomerance.
To pick three, he says the world is
cooling, Arctic
sea ice increased 60 percent over last year at this time, and the International Panel on Climate Change is under so much attack they had to hold a «crisis» meeting.
Although the alarmist side constantly moves the goal posts [from runaway global warming, to drowning polar bears, to catastrophic Greenland and Antarctic melting, to rising
sea levels, to disappearing
sea ice, to «global
cooling proves global warming», etc., etc.], the simple fact remains that the UN / IPCC has been consistently wrong from AR - 1 through AR - 4, and the Gore / Hansen duo has been spectacularly wrong.
Chris V. CO2 goes up, temp goes down, oceans
cool,
sea levels decrease, arctic
sea ice is within 1979 -2000 mean, AGW theory of catastrophic warming is B U S T... Even the fraudulent manipulation of the GISS data set does not change that.
The post (maybe part of the press release) states: «The simulations showed that diminishing Arctic
sea ice induced a significant surface warming in the Arctic Ocean /... and
cooling over northern North America.
The end of the first half of the Holocene — between about 5 and 4 ka — was punctuated by rapid events at various latitudes, such as an abrupt increase in NH
sea ice cover (Jennings et al., 2001); a decrease in Greenland deuterium excess, reflecting a change in the hydrological cycle (Masson - Delmotte et al., 2005b); abrupt
cooling events in European climate (Seppa and Birks, 2001; Lauritzen, 2003); widespread North American drought for centuries (Booth et al., 2005); and changes in South American climate (Marchant and Hooghiemstra, 2004).
When earth is warm and Arctic
Sea Ice is melted, it snows more and earth
cools.
at some point the ocean temperature will not be warm enough to keep the arctic
sea ice melted and the
sea ice will increase and halt the
cooling.
They actually predicted that both poles would warm however the Antarctic
cooled and increased
sea ice extent utterly contrary to expectations.
They still think that the Antarctic surface is warming, not
cooling like you now believe because of this Hansen paper: «In contrast, the Southern Ocean (specifically the region where Antarctic
sea ice forms) has been warming at 0.17 °C per decade.»