Back then, what she and a colleague found was not only groundbreaking, it pretty accurately predicted what is happening now in the Arctic, as
sea ice levels break record low after record low.
Not exact matches
Never mind that this summer saw a record -
breaking meltdown of Arctic
sea ice, presaging rising
sea levels and more extremely weird weather.
Since Larsen C's
ice already floats in the ocean, the big
break - off won't immediately raise global
sea levels.
The iceberg, which is likely to be named A68, was already floating before it
broke away so there is no immediate impact on
sea levels, but the calving has left the Larsen C
ice shelf reduced in area by more than 12 percent.
Because the
ice shelf was already floating, its
break - up will not cause global
sea levels to rise.
New understanding of how big
ice sheets on Greenland and Antarctica might
break up has forced the IPCC to almost double its estimates of likely
sea level rise by the end of the century — to as much as 1 metre.
«The long term evolution of an
ice shelf — whether or not it
breaks up and disintegrates — is an important factor in how fast
sea level will rise.»
Scientists closely monitor the size and movement of
ice shelves because when they
break up, they indirectly contribute to
sea level rise through their impact on land
ice.
Not only are
ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica
breaking up faster than scientists expected, but more of their melt water is flowing into oceans, he said, which will raise
sea levels by 3.3 feet (1 meter) by 2100.
As higher
sea levels lifting the glacier, then the tides would constantly flex the
ice tongues
breaking and releasing the
ice opening up the
ice flow «cork in the bottle».
The latter events left behind distinctive rock - sequences typically consisting of tillites (ancient boulder - clay, now solid rock) representing
ice - deposited debris, overlain with a depositional
break by cap - carbonates (chemical sediments of marine origin deposited during interglacials following global
sea -
level rises).
As higher
sea levels lifting the glacier, then the tides would constantly flex the
ice tongues
breaking and releasing the
ice opening up the
ice flow «cork in the bottle».
8) Accelerated mass loss in Greenland and / or Antarctica, perhaps with another huge
ice shelf
breaking off, but in any case coupled with another measurable rise in the rate of
sea level rise, 9) The Fifth Assessment Report (2012 - 2013) really spelling out what we face with no punches pulled.
But worse, the rising
sea levels will raise the Antarctic
ice shelves and they will
break off or collapse.
Most of the WAIS rests on rock that is below
sea level; if the Ross
Ice Shelf broke up, the entire mass of ice could gradually disintegrate, raising sea level about 3 meters (11 fee
Ice Shelf
broke up, the entire mass of
ice could gradually disintegrate, raising sea level about 3 meters (11 fee
ice could gradually disintegrate, raising
sea level about 3 meters (11 feet).
When
ice shelves already largely in the water
break off from the continental
ice mass, this does not have much direct effect on
sea level per se.
, lightning related insurance claims, Lyme disease, Malaria, malnutrition, Maple syrup shortage, marine diseases, marine food chain decimated, Meaching (end of the world), megacryometeors, Melanoma, methane burps, melting permafrost, migration, microbes to decompose soil carbon more rapidly, more bad air days, more research needed, mountains
break up, mudslides, next
ice age, Nile delta damaged, no effect in India, nuclear plants bloom, ocean acidification, outdoor hockey threatened, oyster diseases, ozone loss, ozone repair slowed, ozone rise, pests increase, plankton blooms, plankton loss, plant viruses, polar tours scrapped, psychosocial disturbances, railroad tracks deformed, rainfall increase, rainfall reduction, refugees, release of ancient frozen viruses, resorts disappear, rift on Capitol Hill, rivers raised, rivers dry up, rockfalls, rocky peaks crack apart, Ross river disease, salinity reduction, Salmonella,
sea level rise, sex change, ski resorts threatened, smog, snowfall increase, snowfall reduction, societal collapse, songbirds change eating habits, sour grapes, spiders invade Scotland, squid population explosion, spectacular orchids, tectonic plate movement, ticks move northward (Sweden), tides rise, tree beetle attacks, tree foliage increase (UK), tree growth slowed, trees less colourful, trees more colourful, tropics expansion, tsunamis, Venice flooded, volcanic eruptions, walrus pups orphaned, wars over water, water bills double, water supply unreliability, water scarcity (20 % of increase), weeds, West Nile fever, whales move north, wheat yields crushed in Australia, white Christmas dream ends, wildfires, wine — harm to Australian industry, wine industry damage (California), wine industry disaster (US), wine — more English, wine — no more French, wind shift, winters in Britain colder, wolves eat more moose, wolves eat less, workers laid off, World bankruptcy, World in crisis, Yellow fever.
For perspective, if the West Antarctic
Ice Sheet
breaks up entirely into icebergs it will raise the global
sea level by around 15 feet.
Has anyone put the pieces together yet and considered how these improvements in understanding
ice shelf
break - up translate to predicting
sea level rise?
Antarctic
ice extent setting new records last year, and close to
breaking them this year again Extreme weather as measured by ACE on a decline for decades Drought as measured by Palmer Drought Index flat for decades
Sea level increases not accelerating and possibly starting to decelerate Signature tropospheric hot spot completely missing Scientists by the bushel coming up with some of the most absurd excuses as to why....
When
ice breaks off the Pine Island Glacier, he said, more
ice can flow in faster from the mountains above —
ice that will eventually wind up contributing to
sea level rise.
You can't fake spring coming earlier, or trees growing higher up on mountains, or glaciers retreating for kilometres up valleys, or shrinking
ice cover in the Arctic, or birds changing their migration times, or permafrost melting in Alaska, or the tropics expanding, or
ice shelves on the Antarctic peninsula
breaking up, or peak river flow occurring earlier in summer because of earlier snowmelt, or
sea level rising faster and faster, or any of the thousands of similar examples.
No of course it doesn't, But if the past tells us that
ice sheets can
break up quickly and
sea levels rise quickly (for example) than this may give us insight into likely future system response.
Scientists have recently observed major changes in these glaciers: several have
broken up at the ocean end (the terminus), and many have doubled the speed at which they are retreating.2, 5 This has meant a major increase in the amount of
ice and water they discharge into the ocean, contributing to
sea -
level rise, which threatens low - lying populations.2, 3,5 Accelerated melting also adds freshwater to the oceans, altering ecosystems and changing ocean circulation and regional weather patterns.7 (See Greenland
ice sheet hotspot for more information.)
More often, however, as with Gotley and its 11 neighbours, the icebergs
break off as soon as the
ice reaches
sea level, so the calving front doesn't change much.
The
break - up of
ice shelves can also leave huge
ice cliffs 1,000 m high towering over the ocean, which then collapse under their own weight, pushing up
sea level even further.
Nevertheless, the risk of a catastrophic melting and
break - up of the Greenland or West Antarctic
ice sheets is very real, when we consider that
sea level before the most recent
ice age was 15 feet higher than it is now.
For example, the melting of the Greenland
ice sheet
broke previous records in 2002, 2005, and 2007, and seasonal melting from 1996 to 2007 was above average compared with the 1973 - 2007 period.10, 11 The melting of the Greenland
ice sheet contributed around 0.02 inch (0.6 millimeter) to global
sea -
level rise in 2005 — more than double the 1996 contribution.4 From 1993 to 2003 the average rate of
sea -
level rise increased to about 0.12 inches (3.1 millimeters) per year.12 That means that in 2005 Greenland could have contributed 19 percent of the average annual global
sea level rise rate.
As opposed to a glaciers or
ice sheets, which are found on land, floating
ice shelves don't raise global
sea levels appreciably when they
break off into the ocean and melt.
During the program, Beck put forth an apples - to - oranges comparison by suggesting that the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report contradicts Gore's statement in An Inconvenient Truth, that if the West Antarctic or Greenland
ice sheets were to
break up or melt, «
sea level worldwide would go up 20 feet»:
The latter events left behind distinctive rock - sequences typically consisting of tillites (ancient boulder - clay, now solid rock) representing
ice - deposited debris, overlain with a depositional
break by cap - carbonates, chemical sediments of marine origin deposited during interglacials following global
sea -
level rises.
In 2017,
sea ice levels during the spring were higher than usual in the Labrador Sea (home to Davis Strait polar bears) and as a consequence, communities in coastal Labrador and Newfoundland saw record - breaking numbers of bear sightings, including a scary encounter that resulted in a bear being sh
sea ice levels during the spring were higher than usual in the Labrador
Sea (home to Davis Strait polar bears) and as a consequence, communities in coastal Labrador and Newfoundland saw record - breaking numbers of bear sightings, including a scary encounter that resulted in a bear being sh
Sea (home to Davis Strait polar bears) and as a consequence, communities in coastal Labrador and Newfoundland saw record -
breaking numbers of bear sightings, including a scary encounter that resulted in a bear being shot.
However, it appears that record -
breaking sea ice levels in September 2007, the lowest to that date since 1979, had no discernible effect on Chukchi Sea polar bears, as confirmed by research up to 20
sea ice levels in September 2007, the lowest to that date since 1979, had no discernible effect on Chukchi
Sea polar bears, as confirmed by research up to 20
Sea polar bears, as confirmed by research up to 2016.