Two groups (Kauker, et al., and Zhang) ran
sea ice models with an ensemble (many years) of summer weather conditions from previous years.
Not exact matches
The military uses the microwave information to detect ocean wind speeds to feed into weather
models, among other uses, but the data happen to be nearly perfect for sensing
sea ice, says Walt Meier, a
sea -
ice specialist
with the NSIDC.
Dirk Notz and Julienne Stroeve have now compared corresponding
model calculations
with data from satellite measurements, and discovered that the climate
models underestimate the loss of Arctic
sea ice.
With coordinated experiments with six atmospheric general circulation models, forced by observed daily sea - ice concentration and sea surface temperatu
With coordinated experiments
with six atmospheric general circulation models, forced by observed daily sea - ice concentration and sea surface temperatu
with six atmospheric general circulation
models, forced by observed daily
sea -
ice concentration and
sea surface temperatures.
«In our study we used satellite data for
sea ice and
sea surface temperatures to run some coordinated hindcast experiments
with five different atmospheric
models,» Ogawa says.
What's left to figure out is whether this is happening
with other subglacial lakes around the Greenland
ice sheet, as well as whether and how to incorporate the findings into
models that are aimed at gauging how much Greenland might change
with the warming climate and how much water it could add to the rising
seas.
«The primary uncertainty in
sea level rise is what are the
ice sheets going to do over the coming century,» said Mathieu Morlighem, an expert in
ice sheet
modeling at the University of California, Irvine, who led the paper along
with dozens of other contributors from institutions around the world.
In examining the ultimate transdisciplinary issue, humanity's evolving two - way relationship
with the climate, I've had the rare privilege of studying the whole picture, from the climate
models running on supercomputers in Boulder in 1985 to the burning rain forests of the western Amazon in 1989 to the shifting
sea ice around the North Pole in 2003 to the contentious climate treaty talks in one city after another.
For the new study, Thomas Rackow and his colleagues fed actual position and size data of 6,912 Antarctic icebergs into the Finite Element
Sea Ice - Ocean
Model FESOM, which they combined with a dynamic - thermodynamic iceberg model (both of which were developed at the
Model FESOM, which they combined
with a dynamic - thermodynamic iceberg
model (both of which were developed at the
model (both of which were developed at the AWI).
development of a regional scale earth system
model that includes coupling WRF
with other earth system components such as ocean,
sea ice, land surface hydrology, ecosystem, and chemistry; and
Simulations
with general circulation ocean
models do not fully support the gas exchange -
sea ice hypothesis.
Joughin et al. (2010) applied a numerical
ice sheet
model to predicting the future of PIG, their
model suggested ongoing loss of
ice mass from PIG,
with a maximum rate of global
sea level rise of 2.7 cm per century.
A new study combines the latest observations
with an
ice sheet
model to estimate that melting
ice on the Antarctic
ice sheet is likely to add 10 cm to global
sea levels by 2100, but it could be as much as 30 cm.
Just look at the plots taken from CMIP4 and CMIP5
models when they are compared
with measured extents from NSIDC data then tell us where you would place your bet for a summer free of
sea ice.
She has shown, in an
ice sheet
model with gravitationally self - consistent
sea level, there is actually a
sea level fall at the grounding line, which acts to stabilize against the marine
ice sheet instability.
This mixing
model is well suited to quantify fractional contributions (f) from various sources — in this case, meteoric fresh water and
sea ice meltwater mixing
with seawater.
It's a long paper
with a long title: «
Ice melt,
sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate
modeling, and modern observations that 2 oC global warming could be dangerous».
Researchers also combine their observations and data
with computer
models that try to replicate weather and
sea ice conditions in the Arctic.
Natural climate variability of the Arctic atmosphere, the impact of Greenland and PBL stability changes K. Dethloff *, A. Rinke *, W. Dorn *, D. Handorf *, J. H. Christensen ** * AWI Potsdam, ** DMI Copenhagen Unforced and forced long - term
model integrations from 500 to 1000 years
with global coupled atmosphere - ocean -
sea -
ice models have been analysed in order to find out whether the different
models are able to simulate the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) similar to the real atmosphere.
Our
modelled values are consistent
with current rates of Antarctic
ice loss and
sea - level rise, and imply that accelerated mass loss from marine - based portions of Antarctic
ice sheets may ensue when an increase in global mean air temperature of only 1.4 - 2.0 deg.
Zhang, J., D. R. Thomas, D. A. Rothrock, R. W. Lindsay, Y. Yu, and R. Kwok (2003), Assimilation of
ice motion observations and comparisons
with submarine
ice thickness data, J.Geophys.Res., 108 (C6), 3170, DOI: 3110.1029 / 2001JC001041 Zhang, J., and D. A. Rothrock (2003),
Modeling global
sea ice with a thickness and enthalpy distribution
model in generalized curvilinear coordinates, Monthly Weather Review, 131 (5), 845 - 861.
A comparison of observed
sea ice decline
with the
model ensemble spread can tell us only how likely an observed trend is relative to that ensemble.
I don't know if it would be possible to force a climate
model with the observed
sea ice extent evolution (and an extrapolation) to get some information what this might produce.
See the Winton 2011 reference for an attempt to assess whether or not the observed
sea ice time series fits
with expected declines from the coupled
models.
The eventual demise of the summer
sea ice is a common feature of nearly every climate
model projection (the exceptions are
models with very inappropriate initial conditions).
Given that impacts don't scale linearly — that's true both because of the statistics of normal distributions, which imply that (damaging) extremes become much more frequent
with small shifts in the mean, and because significant breakpoints such as melting points for
sea ice, wet - bulb temperatures too high for human survival, and heat tolerance for the most significant human food crops are all «in play» — the
model forecasts using reasonable emissions inputs ought to be more than enough for anyone using sensible risk analysis to know that we making very bad choices right now.
With error bars provided, we can use the PIOMAS
ice volume time series as a proxy record for reality and compare it against
sea -
ice simulations in global climate
models.
Global climate
model projections (in CMIP3 at least) appear to underestimate
sea ice extent losses
with respect to observations, though this is not universally true for all
models and some of them actually have ensemble spreads that are compatible
with PIOMAS
ice volume estimates and satellite observations of
sea ice extent.
Mike's work, like that of previous award winners, is diverse, and includes pioneering and highly cited work in time series analysis (an elegant use of Thomson's multitaper spectral analysis approach to detect spatiotemporal oscillations in the climate record and methods for smoothing temporal data), decadal climate variability (the term «Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation» or «AMO» was coined by Mike in an interview
with Science's Richard Kerr about a paper he had published
with Tom Delworth of GFDL showing evidence in both climate
model simulations and observational data for a 50 - 70 year oscillation in the climate system; significantly Mike also published work
with Kerry Emanuel in 2006 showing that the AMO concept has been overstated as regards its role in 20th century tropical Atlantic SST changes, a finding recently reaffirmed by a study published in Nature), in showing how changes in radiative forcing from volcanoes can affect ENSO, in examining the role of solar variations in explaining the pattern of the Medieval Climate Anomaly and Little
Ice Age, the relationship between the climate changes of past centuries and phenomena such as Atlantic tropical cyclones and global
sea level, and even a bit of work in atmospheric chemistry (an analysis of beryllium - 7 measurements).
These
models consist of connected sub-modules that deal
with radiative transfer, the circulation of the atmosphere and oceans, the physics of moist convection and cloud formation,
sea ice, soil moisture and the like.
Just look at the plots taken from CMIP4 and CMIP5
models when they are compared
with measured extents from NSIDC data then tell us where you would place your bet for a summer free of
sea ice.
But this scenario was created
with models that may underestimate warming because they underestimate feedbacks, such as
sea -
ice albedo.
Polar bears haven't seen what the
ice models are predicting if we don't deal
with the warming patterns and
sea ice loss.
Using comprehensive data sets of observations made between 1979 and 2001 of
sea ice thickness, draft, extent, and speeds, we find that it is possible to tune
model parameters to give satisfactory agreement
with observed data, thereby highlighting the skill of modern
sea ice models, though the parameter values chosen differ according to the
model forcing used.
The
sea - level estimates are consistent
with those from delta18O curves and numerical
ice sheet
models, and imply a significant sensitivity of the WAIS and the coastal margins of the EAIS to orbital oscillations in insolation during the Mid-Pliocene period of relative global warmth.
The paper uses evidence and
modeling to explain how the sun - blocking impact from a 50 - year stretch of unusually intense eruptions of four tropical volcanoes caused sufficient cooling to produce a long - lasting shift in the generation and migration of Arctic Ocean
sea ice,
with substantial consequences for the Northern Hemisphere climate that lasted centuries and left a deep imprint on European history.
The
models also suggested that the rise in Arctic temperatures at the time, corresponded
with the observed reduction in
sea ice.
This one at least is consistent
with other data, like the rapid decline of Arctic
sea ice, way ahead of any
model predictions I've seen published prior to the decline.
By analyzing climate anomalies in the
model that are similar to those that occurred in the early twentieth century, it was found that the simulated temperature increase in the Arctic was related to enhanced wind - driven oceanic inflow into the Barents
Sea with an associated sea ice retre
Sea with an associated
sea ice retre
sea ice retreat.
Just to clarify: It is important to distinguish between attributing the differences between
models (
with anthropogenic forcing) and observations to natural variability and attributing the 33 + year decline in
sea ice to anthropogenic forcing.
In the Antarctic, there is very sparse data on
sea ice thickness — not enough to judge one way or another, leaving only climate
modeling results to work
with.
It is not that the polar regions are amplifying the warming «going on» at lower latitudes, it is that any warming going on AT THE POLES is amplified through inherent positive feedback processes AT THE POLES, and specifically this is primarily the
ice - albedo positive feedback process whereby more open water leads to more warming leads to more open water, etc. *** «Climate
model simulations have shown that
ice albedo feedbacks associated
with variations in snow and
sea -
ice coverage are a key factor in positive feedback mechanisms which amplify climate change at high northern latitudes...»
The fact that I can point to the majority of
models not predicting this fast of a decline, and you can point out a few that say that it might have started by now and it hasn't, totally ignores the fact that either way,
sea ice is diminishing and that is consistent
with accumulating heat in the Earth's climate system.
The
Sea Ice Outlook (SIO) is well established; participation remains high,
with contributions based on methodologies ranging from numerical
models to informed estimates.
Canadian
Ice Service, 4.7, Multiple Methods As with CIS contributions in June 2009, 2010, and 2011, the 2012 forecast was derived using a combination of three methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end - of - winter arctic ice thicknesses and extents, as well as an examination of Surface Air Temperature (SAT), Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB) Model, which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predicto
Ice Service, 4.7, Multiple Methods As
with CIS contributions in June 2009, 2010, and 2011, the 2012 forecast was derived using a combination of three methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end - of - winter arctic
ice thicknesses and extents, as well as an examination of Surface Air Temperature (SAT), Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB) Model, which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predicto
ice thicknesses and extents, as well as an examination of Surface Air Temperature (SAT),
Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB) Model, which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predicto
Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB)
Model, which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic
Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predicto
Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and
sea ice predicto
sea ice predicto
ice predictors.
Yuan et al. (LDEO Columbia University), 5.08 (+ / - 0.51), Statistical The prediction is made by statistical
models, which are capable to predict Arctic
sea ice concentrations at grid points 3 - month in advance
with reasonable skills.
«Climate
model simulations have shown that
ice albedo feedbacks associated
with variations in snow and
sea -
ice coverage are a key factor in positive feedback mechanisms which amplify climate change at high northern latitudes...»
Individual responses continue to be based on a range of methods: statistical, numerical
models, comparison
with previous rates of
sea ice loss, composites of several approaches, estimates based on various non
sea ice datasets and trends, and subjective information (the heuristic category).
Our strategy is to initialize the
sea ice anomalies
with respect to the
model mean that are good approximations to actual arctic
sea ice anomalies.
«A General Circulation Experiment
with a Coupled Atmosphere, Ocean and
Sea Ice Model.»