Decadal hindcast simulations of Arctic Ocean
sea ice thickness made by a modern dynamic - thermodynamic sea ice model and forced independently by both the ERA - 40 and NCEP / NCAR reanalysis data sets are compared for the first time.
Not exact matches
Using comprehensive data sets of observations
made between 1979 and 2001 of
sea ice thickness, draft, extent, and speeds, we find that it is possible to tune model parameters to give satisfactory agreement with observed data, thereby highlighting the skill of modern
sea ice models, though the parameter values chosen differ according to the model forcing used.
Volume, in contrast, is crucial in determining the vulnerability of Arctic
sea ice to rapid future reductions (since thin
ice is much more prone to react strongly to a single warm summer,
making single very - low
sea -
ice summers more likely), and the
thickness of the
ice determines the exchange of heat between ocean and atmosphere.
To
make use of that potential we would need good estimates of
sea ice thickness, such as might be obtained from ICESat or CryoSat (i.e., complete spatial coverage).
Ice thickness was made an issue to add to the focus on sea ice melti
Ice thickness was
made an issue to add to the focus on
sea ice melti
ice melting.