If you look closely at the satellite
sea level data for 1993 + (e.g., at U. Colorado), you will visually see a difference between the earlier Topex / Poseidon data (1993 - 2002) and the subsequent Jason 1,2 data (2003 - present).
Update (26th March 2015): Indeed, a recent paper by Jens Morten Hansen et al. has suggested that, after accounting for the post-glacial rebound effects discussed above, the 18.6 year lunar cycle (and multiples of it) can explain most of the non-linear trends in
the sea level data for the North Sea and Baltic Sea — see Hansen et al., 2015 (Abstract).
Apparently no one from Bob Carr's office bothered to check
sea level data for Kiribati.
Not exact matches
And in many, many cases — such as with ocean temperatures, rising
sea levels, or ice shelf traveling speeds — scientists have recorded the
data for decades, systematically, consistently, and with precision.
Whereas most studies look to the last 150 years of instrumental
data and compare it to projections
for the next few centuries, we looked back 20,000 years using recently collected carbon dioxide, global temperature and
sea level data spanning the last ice age.
New
data on the relationship among carbon dioxide,
sea level and temperature over the last 20,000 years was the basis
for looking forward 10,000 years.
The analysis, which used land elevation and tidal
data, found that 460 acres, or about a sixth of Hallandale Beach, would be below
sea level during high tide under a 3 - foot scenario of rise, according to Nancy Gassman, a natural resources administrator
for Broward County's Natural Resources Planning and Management Division who worked on the assessment.
Mapping historical shoreline change provides useful
data for assessing exposure to future erosion hazards, even if the rate of
sea level rise changes in the future.
While satellites have provided consistently good
data for years, the next frontier in
sea level rise measurement is a new type of radar that can capture a more crisp, higher - resolution picture of
sea surface heights.
Pettersen is hopeful that, with more
data analysis over longer periods of time, researchers will find more answers yet to account
for the melting ice sheet and the subsequent
sea level rise that has already had an impact on regions across the planet.
«Polar regions have been changing very rapidly, providing
data for our projections on
sea ice, snow cover, ice sheets and
sea level rise,» says David Vaughan of the British Antarctic Survey in Cambridge, UK, the lead author of the cryosphere chapter.
In addition, GOCE
data could be used to help validate satellite altimetry measurements
for an even clearer understanding of ice - sheet and
sea -
level change.
«But it's less likely that other countries are going to make sure that U.S. states and cities have the right
data to respond to drought and
sea level rise, so I'd prefer that the U.S. continue to be a welcoming place
for all scientists.»
Bed topography
data are vital
for computer models used to project future changes to ice sheets and their contribution to
sea level rise.
No single entity is capable of addressing the vast needs
for improved climate services in these nations:
for everything from projections of future
sea -
level rise that help planners identify places to build and develop that are out of harm's way, to maps that overlay population, infrastructure, and climate
data to help decision makers target resources to areas of greatest vulnerability.
Eelco Rohling of the UK National Oceanography Centre at the University of Southampton and colleagues reconstructed
sea level fluctuations over the last 520,000 years and compared this to global climate and carbon dioxide
levels data for the same period.
They compared existing National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) records of upper - ocean temperatures in coastal waters
for each U.S. ocean coastline with records of actual
sea level changes from 1955 to 2012, and
data from U.S. / European satellite altimeter missions since 1992.
Ice core
data from Antarctic from ocean sediments show 8 episodes of very large ice flux — largest 14,600 years ago, meltwater pulse 1a — 1 - 3 meters
sea level rise per century
for several centuries.
Paleoclimate
data for sea level change indicate that
sea level changed at rates of the order of a meter per century [81]--[83], even at times when the forcings driving climate change were far weaker than the human - made forcing.
«The shock
for us was that tidal flooding could become the new normal in the next 15 years; we didn't think it would be so soon,» said Melanie Fitzpatrick, one of three researchers at the nonprofit who analyzed tide gauge
data and
sea level projections, producing soused prognoses
for scores of coastal Americans.
The
SEA must also collect and report school -
level data on nine leading indicators and eight achievement indicators
for any Tier I or Tier II school that receives a SIG award.
This webinar explored how
SEAs can build an information system designed to drive productivity — what
data are needed, how to compile the
data into useful resources
for leaders at every
level of education and how these stakeholders can use the
data to drive decision making and advance productivity.
As these
data sets expand (paleo -
sea level / paleo - temperature) there's every chance we can home - in on some really self - consistent interpretations of temp /
sea level / greenhouse gas relationships going back several millenia which we be extraordinarily useful as targets
for modelling and as predictors of future scenarios.
When I did this analysis on the first half of the
data for your 2007 paper it showed that it would have made a huge over forecast of the rate of
sea level rise over the second half of the
data.
For other indicators — glacial retreat,
sea level, arctic ice extent, etc. — the
data is equally noisy, and it is difficult having a sensible discussion without the inevitable cherry - picking on both sides of the argument.
The latest
data by NSIDC
for Arctic
sea ice extent shows that 2008 ice coverage has fallen to 2007
levels for the end of May:
I suppose that if all uncertainties are resolved in the direction of lower risk, we just might get away with BAU
for the next few decades without a complete disaster (though continued
sea level rise, ocean acidification and 2 degrees Celsius actually sound pretty risky to me, and the risk that there are other factors in play seems to be reinforced by paleo
data on glacial - interglacial transitions).
For example, Rahmstorf et al. (2012) in their Fig. 6 show the rate curve for the Church & White 2006 and 2011 and the Jevrejeva et al. 2008 sea - level data sets, corrected for land - water storage in order to isolate the climate - driven sea - level ri
For example, Rahmstorf et al. (2012) in their Fig. 6 show the rate curve
for the Church & White 2006 and 2011 and the Jevrejeva et al. 2008 sea - level data sets, corrected for land - water storage in order to isolate the climate - driven sea - level ri
for the Church & White 2006 and 2011 and the Jevrejeva et al. 2008
sea -
level data sets, corrected
for land - water storage in order to isolate the climate - driven sea - level ri
for land - water storage in order to isolate the climate - driven
sea -
level rise.
If you study the
data in detail, and have the «skillz» to do so, it's obvious that
for estimating
sea level acceleration on century time scales quadratic fits just ain't right.
Mike's work, like that of previous award winners, is diverse, and includes pioneering and highly cited work in time series analysis (an elegant use of Thomson's multitaper spectral analysis approach to detect spatiotemporal oscillations in the climate record and methods
for smoothing temporal
data), decadal climate variability (the term «Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation» or «AMO» was coined by Mike in an interview with Science's Richard Kerr about a paper he had published with Tom Delworth of GFDL showing evidence in both climate model simulations and observational
data for a 50 - 70 year oscillation in the climate system; significantly Mike also published work with Kerry Emanuel in 2006 showing that the AMO concept has been overstated as regards its role in 20th century tropical Atlantic SST changes, a finding recently reaffirmed by a study published in Nature), in showing how changes in radiative forcing from volcanoes can affect ENSO, in examining the role of solar variations in explaining the pattern of the Medieval Climate Anomaly and Little Ice Age, the relationship between the climate changes of past centuries and phenomena such as Atlantic tropical cyclones and global
sea level, and even a bit of work in atmospheric chemistry (an analysis of beryllium - 7 measurements).
For that purpose we use global grids of thermosteric
sea level data, available over 1950 — 2003.
For anyone who would like to explore what sea level rise would mean for the US coastline, check out this interactive map I made using the EPA's da
For anyone who would like to explore what
sea level rise would mean
for the US coastline, check out this interactive map I made using the EPA's da
for the US coastline, check out this interactive map I made using the EPA's
data.
Thus, otherwise quite conservative voices have been stressing the «unknown unknown» nature of this problem and suggesting that, based on paleo -
data (
for instance), it was really hard to rule out
sea level rises measured in feet, and not in inches.
> A new comment on the post # 74 «Michael Crichton's State of Confusion» is > waiting
for your approval > > Author: Hans Erren -LRB--RRB- > E-mail: erren21 @... > URL: > Whois:... > Comment: >
Sea -
level rise > > Although satellite
data (TOPEX / POSEIDON (sic) and JASON) shows a much > steeper trend over recent years (2.8 mm / yr) than the long term mean > estimates from tide gauges (1.7 to 2.4 mm / yr), each method compared to > itself does not indicate an accelleration.
For those that are interested, I have posted some further discussion of the
sea level budget and the possibility of errors caused by the introduction of Argo
data on Roger Pielke Sr.'s Climate Science weblog.
If we had better
sea level rise
data for the whole period, we might see that the heat storage curve into the ocean had a shape that better matched the simple function approximation than the land surface
data does, or we might have better information on internal climate modes that confused or delayed the temperature response.
Visit climate.gov to click
for the
data on Arctic conditions,
sea level change, severe storms and more.
For 1994 - 2009, using
sea -
level data, Willis et al. (2010) reconstructed an increase in the upper AMOC limb at 41 ° N by 2.8 Sv.
In the past I have used the University of Colorado
for the
sea level data, but I am rather disgusted by the constant tinkering that has been happening.
New website provides one - stop shop
for flood maps,
data on
sea level and temperature changes, and other information to aid in planning
for future extreme weather events
The question is, given that
datum point (the bronze age river) and being able to estimate from river flows, etc. the likely distance to the
sea, what
sea level rise would you propose
for the Bronze Age in the Eastern UK?
Arctic
sea ice shrank to its lowest
level in 38 years last month, setting a record low
for the month of May and setting up conditions
for what could become the smallest Arctic ice extent in history, according to National Snow and Ice
Data Center data released Tues
Data Center
data released Tues
data released Tuesday.
Projections
for global
sea level rise by 2100 range from 8 inches to 6.6 feet above 1992
levels, though the lowest end of this range is a simple extension of historic
sea level rise — and recent
data indicate this rate has nearly doubled in recent years.
Some groups have tried to develop models of the rebounding land, so that
sea level researchers can apply «Glacial Isostatic Adjustments» (GIA) to their
data to correct
for the effects.
These climate - related land storage effects could be significant
for global
sea -
levels, though unfortunately there seem to be very few direct experimental measurements of the factors involved, and so the only studies of these effects seem to have been from computer modelling of
data from weather
data «reanalysis» models (e.g., ERA - 40).
Data taken from Permanent Service
for Mean
Sea Level (PSMSL), 2012, «Tide Gauge
Data», Extracted from database 18 Jul 2012 from http://www.psmsl.org/
data/obtaining/.
How,
for example, does this incident cast doubt on the findings from satellite
data, radiosondes, borehole analysis, glacial melt observations,
sea ice melt,
sea level rise, proxy reconstructions, permafrost melt and such like, gathered completely independently of the CRU?
Linear trends are appropriate
for the time period after 1990 where the
data are described well by a linear trend plus interannual noise (that's why we show a linear trend
for the satellite
sea level in our paper), but they don't capture the longer - term climate evolution very well, e.g. the nearly flat temperatures up to 1980.
Data, collected
for the years 2003 through 2010, indicates that melting ice raised
sea levels worldwide by an average of 1.48 millimeters (0.06 inches) each year.
Are there any parts of the world that are geologically stable enough to use them
for direct
sea -
level data?