Not exact matches
Research group Climate Central has created a plug -
in for Google Earth that illustrates how catastrophic an «extreme»
sea -
level rise scenario would be if the flooding happened now, based on projections
in a 2017 report from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA).
In the 2 - meter, sea - level rise scenario, 91 percent of Midway's Eastern Island is projected to be inundated, compared to 19 percent in the passive mode
In the 2 - meter,
sea -
level rise scenario, 91 percent of Midway's Eastern Island is projected to be inundated, compared to 19 percent
in the passive mode
in the passive model.
Dr Svetlana Jevrejeva from the NOC, who is the lead author on this paper, said «Coastal cities and vulnerable tropical coastal ecosystems will have very little time to adapt to the fast
sea level rise these predictions show,
in scenarios with global warming above two degree.
Silver Award: Alex Kuffner The Providence Journal «
Rising seas, rising stakes» Nov. 20, 2016 «Losing ground» March 19, 2017 «On the brink» July 9, 2017 Judges praised Alex Kuffner for his comprehensive look at the risks facing Rhode Island communities from either a once - in - a-century hurricane or a sea level rise of seven feet by the end of the century, as projected in a worst - case scenario by researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (
Rising seas,
rising stakes» Nov. 20, 2016 «Losing ground» March 19, 2017 «On the brink» July 9, 2017 Judges praised Alex Kuffner for his comprehensive look at the risks facing Rhode Island communities from either a once - in - a-century hurricane or a sea level rise of seven feet by the end of the century, as projected in a worst - case scenario by researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (
rising stakes» Nov. 20, 2016 «Losing ground» March 19, 2017 «On the brink» July 9, 2017 Judges praised Alex Kuffner for his comprehensive look at the risks facing Rhode Island communities from either a once -
in - a-century hurricane or a
sea level rise of seven feet by the end of the century, as projected
in a worst - case
scenario by researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
«Regional
sea -
level scenarios: Helping US Northeast plan for faster - than - global
rise: Global
sea level could
rise by as much as 8 feet by 2100
in a worst - case
scenario.»
Moreover,
in a worst - case
scenario, global
sea level could
rise by about 8 feet by 2100.
The report provides a range of possible
scenarios, from at least 1 foot of global
sea -
level rise by 2100 to a worst - case
rise that's 1.6 feet higher than a
scenario in a key 2012 study that the report updates.
With less than 14 inches of
sea -
level rise, most of the 90 U.S. coastal cities studied outside of Alaska would see a 25-fold increase
in disruptive and damaging flooding by around 2080, 2060, 2040 or 2030 under the low, intermediate - low, intermediate and intermediate - high
scenarios, respectively.
Given that we now have several years more data, we can essentially «test» the IPCC predictions and we arrive at the conclusion (i.e., message 1) that the climate system is tracking the «worst case
scenario» (or worse
in the case of ice melt and
sea -
level rise) presented by the IPCC.
Looking at
sea level rise, water would
rise 37 inches
in the moderate warming
scenario and 48 inches
in the faster model.
In addition to documenting the amount of defensive ecosystems in the U.S., the researchers fed data about property values, population, income and age into a model that tested four sea - level rise scenario
In addition to documenting the amount of defensive ecosystems
in the U.S., the researchers fed data about property values, population, income and age into a model that tested four sea - level rise scenario
in the U.S., the researchers fed data about property values, population, income and age into a model that tested four
sea -
level rise scenarios.
This is distinctly alarmist... It is common ground that if indeed Greenland melted, it would release this amount of water, but only after, and over, millennia, so that the Armageddon
scenario he predicts, insofar as it suggests that
sea level rises of 7 metres might occur
in the immediate future, is not
in line with the scientific consensus.
Including the elevation effects
in the model increases the estimated
sea -
level rise by a small but significant amount (5 % enhancement of melt by 2100 and 10 % by 2200 for a climate warming
scenario).
Recent projections show that for even the lowest emissions
scenarios, thermal expansion of ocean waters21 and the melting of small mountain glaciers22 will result
in 11 inches of
sea level rise by 2100, even without any contribution from the ice sheets
in Greenland and Antarctica.
On the high end, recent work suggests that 4 feet is plausible.23, 3,6,7,8
In the context of risk - based analysis, some decision makers may wish to use a wider range of scenarios, from 8 inches to 6.6 feet by 2100.10,2 In particular, the high end of these scenarios may be useful for decision makers with a low tolerance for risk (see Figure 2.26 on global sea level rise).10, 2 Although scientists can not yet assign likelihood to any particular scenario, in general, higher emissions scenarios that lead to more warming would be expected to lead to higher amounts of sea level ris
In the context of risk - based analysis, some decision makers may wish to use a wider range of
scenarios, from 8 inches to 6.6 feet by 2100.10,2
In particular, the high end of these scenarios may be useful for decision makers with a low tolerance for risk (see Figure 2.26 on global sea level rise).10, 2 Although scientists can not yet assign likelihood to any particular scenario, in general, higher emissions scenarios that lead to more warming would be expected to lead to higher amounts of sea level ris
In particular, the high end of these
scenarios may be useful for decision makers with a low tolerance for risk (see Figure 2.26 on global
sea level rise).10, 2 Although scientists can not yet assign likelihood to any particular
scenario,
in general, higher emissions scenarios that lead to more warming would be expected to lead to higher amounts of sea level ris
in general, higher emissions
scenarios that lead to more warming would be expected to lead to higher amounts of
sea level rise.
This figure dramatically
rises to 8 % and 11 %,
in the more pessimistic
scenarios, respectively, for 2 and 3 meters of
sea level rise.
Based on a model that excludes ice sheet flow due to a lack of basis
in published literature, it is estimated that
sea level rise will be,
in a low
scenario, 18 to 38 cm (7 to 15 inches) and
in a high
scenario, 26 to 59 cm (10 to 23 inches).
Even
in the best - case
scenario, if we make drastic cuts
in emissions soon,
sea levels will
rise by anything from 10 metres to 25 metres over the next few thousand years.
Most certainly there will be
sea level rise, but even
in a
scenario that sees the melting of Greenland, it will take centuries for the
sea level rise to occur.
This choice, they say, is the
sea level rise «locked
in» by the two warming
scenarios: the target of two degrees Celsius vs. the
sea level rise associated with unabated emissions and four degrees warming by the end of the century.
Thus, I would suggest that decision makers use these «best - available» distributions but also consider the consequences for their decisions of «worst - case»
sea -
level rise scenarios (e.g., about 2.5 m globally
in the course of the century according to Kopp et al., 2014).
«Up to 8.5 feet of global
sea level rise is possible by 2100»
in a worst - case emissions
scenario.
Melting glaciers, intensifying storm systems,
rising sea levels, and species
in jeopardy — these are scary
scenarios, especially when you're just eleven years old.
Multimeter
sea level rise is a lower probability
scenario despite having happened
in the deglaciation.
Paul D... As a part - time alarmist I would answer that with a little bit of extrapolation added to some warnings of climate scientists I guess the worst case
scenario at least includes the total collapse of the WAIS, creating tsunamis at least all over the Pacific rim, the subsequent
sea level rise of c. 7m will destroy most of the remaining harbours, communication centers near coasts, next up would be the melting of the collapsed ice
in the southern ocean altering the climate of the entire southern hemisphere, making it near - impossible to guess what areas are good for similar agriculture as before, leading to massive movements of people.
[2011 paper 157 cites] Exploring high - end
scenarios for local
sea level rise to develop flood protection strategies for a low - lying delta — the Netherlands as an example Sea level rise, especially combined with possible changes in storm surges and increased river discharge resulting from climate change, poses a major threat in low - lying river delt
sea level rise to develop flood protection strategies for a low - lying delta — the Netherlands as an example
Sea level rise, especially combined with possible changes in storm surges and increased river discharge resulting from climate change, poses a major threat in low - lying river delt
Sea level rise, especially combined with possible changes
in storm surges and increased river discharge resulting from climate change, poses a major threat
in low - lying river deltas.
We analyzed the effect of a medium - high greenhouse gas emissions
scenario (Special Report on Emissions
Scenarios A2
in IPCC 2000) and included updated projections of
sea -
level rise based on work by Rahmstorf (Science 315 (5810): 368, 2007).
Frightening thought — if and only if the AGW centric prediction of future climate is either not completely correct, or out right wrong, consider extreme
scenarios which would result
in a drastically (and painfully) different outcome than the prophecied
sea level rise / climatic tropical expansion / northerly movement of species model.
Even the worst - case
scenarios of
sea level rise suggest that it will take many years, perhaps decades, to have truly catastrophic effects (e.g. to displace tens of millions of people
in coastal areas).
Swiss Re used climate change
scenarios by incorporating
rising sea levels in our underwriting tools so that the city could translate feet of
sea level rise into dollars of potential economic losses.
Jim has made his actually worst case
scenarios abundantly clear
in many interviews,
in the Washington Post for instance: «
sea level rise that can be measured by feet more than inches», and
in the ERL papers itself «measured
in meters», and
in the quote you picked up on.
For example, if this contribution were to grow linearly with global average temperature change, the upper ranges of
sea level rise for SRES
scenarios shown
in Table SPM - 3 would increase by 0.1 m to 0.2 m. Larger values can not be excluded, but understanding of these effects is too limited to assess their likelihood or provide a best estimate or an upper bound for
sea level rise.
Sea level rise as observed (from Church and White 2006) shown
in red up to the year 2001, together with the IPCC (2001)
scenarios for 1990 - 2100.
The TAR showed
sea level rise curves for a range of emission
scenarios (shown
in the Figure above together with the new observational record of Church and White 2006).
The draft's authors suggest that under the worst - case emissions
scenario the modelers considered, global
sea levels could
rise by up to 1 meter by the end of the century, about two centimeters higher than the top of the range offered
in 2007.
«A
rise of over 1 m by 2100 for strong warming
scenarios can not be ruled out,» Rahmstorf (2007), extended by Vermeer and Rahmstorf (2009), who project
sea -
level rise from 1990 to 2100
in the range 75 - 190 cm.
Because of the uncertainties
in projected
sea level rise over the remainder of this century, Sasmito and his co-authors use both the low and the high
sea level rise scenario from the most recent International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report (AR5).
This analysis modeled exposure to coastal flooding for four different points
in time (2012, 2050, 2070, and 2100) and two different
sea level rise scenarios.
Each base's exposure is calculated based on the National Climate Assessment's midrange or «intermediate - high»
sea level rise scenario (referred to
in this analysis as «intermediate»), which projects a global average increase of 3.7 feet above 2012
levels, by 2100; and a «highest»
scenario based on a more rapid rate of increase, which projects a global average increase of 6.3 feet.
In our research group the «semi-empirical method» was developed to estimate future
sea level rise following from a specified global warming
scenario.
In all SRES
scenarios, the average rate of
sea -
level rise during the 21st century very probably exceeds the 1961 to 2003 average rate (1.8 ± 0.5 mm / yr).
While Mörner et al. (2004) suggest that the increased risk of flooding during the 21st century for the Maldives has been overstated, Woodworth (2005) concludes that a
rise in sea level of approximately 50 cm during the 21st century remains the most reliable
scenario to employ
in future studies of the Maldives.
In that
scenario, Greenland's ice cap will likely collapse, and the resulting
sea -
level rise will wash away any low - lying island nations that are still around.
In fact, there are far more documented instances of the AR4 being too conservative, rather than too alarmist, on emissions
scenarios,
sea level rise, and Arctic
sea - ice melt.
A report on the impacts of climate change on human health published by the European Commission Joint Research Council also shows that coastal flooding and high
sea -
level rise scenarios could have significant negative effects on mental health,
in addition to high economic costs.
«It is very likely that the rate of global mean
sea level rise during the 21st century will exceed the rate observed during 1971 — 2010 for all Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP)
scenarios due to increases
in ocean warming and loss of mass from glaciers and ice sheets.
In my opinion, if emissions follow a business - as - usual
scenario,
sea level rise of at least two meters is likely within a century.
While that 55 inches may sound exaggerated, it's less than half of what scientists project could happen
in an extreme
sea level rise scenario.
San Francisco,
in its complaint, included a map showing water inundation for the city with 66 inches of
sea level rise plus 42 inches of flooding from a 100 - year storm, a
scenario they called «unlikely, but possible.»
projected
sea level rise for the most optimistic scenario ~ 80 cm (B1 in table 2 — this scenario has a warming of 2degrees by 2100) projected Sea level rise for the most pessimistic scenario ~ 135 cm (A1FI in table 2 — this scenario has a warming of 4.5 degrees by 21
sea level rise for the most optimistic
scenario ~ 80 cm (B1
in table 2 — this
scenario has a warming of 2degrees by 2100) projected
Sea level rise for the most pessimistic scenario ~ 135 cm (A1FI in table 2 — this scenario has a warming of 4.5 degrees by 21
Sea level rise for the most pessimistic
scenario ~ 135 cm (A1FI
in table 2 — this
scenario has a warming of 4.5 degrees by 2100)