Not exact matches
There are
other puzzling passages in the gospel, such as the description
of Jesus» journey (7:31) from Tyre to Galilee «through the midst
of the borders
of Decapolis» (S.E.
of the
Sea of Galilee, and on the
other side from both Tyre and Galilee itself), and the highly - coloured
account of John the Baptist's death, which bristles with improbabilities; these errors are unlikely to come from the pen
of Mark, who was presumably familiar with Palestinian conditions.
«Taking into
account the size
of adult squid, the toothfish probably is its most common prey species, because no
other deep -
sea fish
of similar size are available around the Antarctic,» says Laptikhovsky.
Many ridiculous hypothesis were started to
account for its origin, and among
others it was conjectured to be the solidified foam
of the
sea, a rungoid growth in the ocean similar to the fungi which form on trees, the excreta
of sea - birds, & c.
This is remarkable in a number
of ways — first, these are the highest estimates
of sea level rise by 2100 that has been published in the literature to date, and secondly, while they don't take into
account the full uncertainty in
other aspects
of sea level rise considered by IPCC, their numbers are significantly higher in any case.
Are you taking that one graph, and then without taking into
account any
other scientific research as to why the Arctic
sea ice decline is happening, making a linear interpolation
of that decline to come up with a «prediction»?
Can the numerical simulation and forecasting
of hurricanes be improved by
accounting for these and a host
of other processes involved in the dynamic, two - way interaction between
sea and storm [Zhao and Chan, 2017; and H. Zhang et al., 2016]?
In
other words, they found that once post-glacial rebound effects and lunar cycle effects had been
accounted for, the
sea level rise had essentially been constant (1.18 mm / year) since at least the start
of the tidal gauge records (1849).
Without
accounting for recharge vs discharge, the much smaller estimates
of all the
other factors contributing to
sea level rise are simply not well constrained.
Higher rates
of discharge could
account for the enigmatic missing
sea level contributions reported by the IPCC and
other researchers (i.e. Gregory 2012).
In addition to the satellite calibration error, his analysis also takes into
account other factors that have influenced
sea - level rise in the last several decades, such as the eruption
of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines in 1991 and the recent El Niño weather pattern.
Local topography, bay and river orientation, depth
of the
sea bottom, astronomical tides, as well as
other physical features, are taken into
account in a predefined grid referred to as a SLOSH basin.
«Global net energy budget is shown as a graph that takes
account of net radiation received, ocean heat content change, and
other net energy changes from melting
sea ice, glaciers, etc..
This
accounts for 65 %
of total
sea level rise over the last 4 decades with the
other components being land - based ice melt in antarctica (yes, land based ice levels are dropping even as
sea ice levels are expanding) greenland and land - based glaciers.
Natural Variability Doesn't
Account for Observed Temperature Increase In it's press release announcement, NASA points out that while there are other factors than greenhouse gases contributing to the amount of warming observed — changes in the sun's irradiance, oscillations of sea surface temperatures in the tropics, changes in aerosol levels in the atmosphere — these factors are not sufficient to account for the temperature increases observed sinc
Account for Observed Temperature Increase In it's press release announcement, NASA points out that while there are
other factors than greenhouse gases contributing to the amount
of warming observed — changes in the sun's irradiance, oscillations
of sea surface temperatures in the tropics, changes in aerosol levels in the atmosphere — these factors are not sufficient to
account for the temperature increases observed sinc
account for the temperature increases observed since 1880.
They determined, however, that this volume had now increased by a further 3 cubic miles each year, prompted by an acceleration in the rate at which the ice caps and glaciers are melting.Unlike what many
other scientists have said — including, most prominently, NASA's James Hansen (who believes that a rise in 17 inches by 2100 will be mainly precipitated by the melting
of ice sheets)-- the authors
of this study believe that the loss
of ice from glaciers and ice caps will
account for the majority
of the expected rise in
sea levels.