Sentences with phrase «search court opinions»

On Feb. 27, I reported the impending launch of a new Web - based service that will search trial transcripts the way other research sites search court opinions.

A former Delaware trial lawyer is preparing to launch a Web - based service that will search trial transcripts the way other research sites search court opinions.

A notable enhancement launched this week: Google Scholar added the ability to search court opinions and law journals by jurisdiction.

Not exact matches

It limits your search to articles, theses, books, abstracts and court opinions, from academic publishers, professional societies, online repositories, universities and other web sites.

Haley auto group haley chevrolet, ford, volvo, used cars → Richmond richmond, virginia news, business, sports → Shipwithsonic place an order → Chesterfield county, virginia wikipedia → Slideshow landing page wistv columbia, south carolina → Knoxville bicycles craigslist → Port manteaux word maker onelook dictionary search → Tertium quids freedom & prosperity radio → Court of appeals of virginia unpublished opinions in pdf → Record radio how to record online radio easily here!

From diary entries, social worker's reports, half - recalled memories, story problems, arrest records, family lore, Supreme Court opinions, and her grandmother's letters, Rory crafts a devastating collage that shows us her world while she searches for the way out of it.

«Adding law review citations to judicial opinions helps us rank search results more intelligently, for example, giving a relevance boost to cases that aren't cited by courts, but are cited by law review articles.

And so it is with Google's entry into the legal research field with its announcement yesterday that Google Scholar now allows users to search full - text legal opinions from U.S. federal and state appellate and trial courts.

Searching for clarity in the family courts The differing opinions of senior judges on matters such as the privacy of proceedings mean family practitioners can struggle to accurately advise clients, explains Alex Carruthers Once again, family law cases hit the headlines in national newspapers in 2015.

The majority opinion of Justice Stewart was specifically approved by a unanimous Supreme Court of Canada in Hunter v Southam Inc., [1984] 2 SCR 145 where Justice Brian Dickson held, at p. 159, that s. 8 of the Charter containing the constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure is not restricted to the protection of property or associated with the law of trespass, at p. 159: «[I] n Katz... Stewart J. delivering the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court declared at p. 351 that «the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places».

Every day, it becomes easier to locate legal information.32 Gone are the days of complicated search strings or telephone calls to the court for copies of the latest unpublished opinions.

For example, Google Scholar has a good database of court opinions and a powerful search engine.

From within the Tabulaw site, you can search for a court opinion.

While phones are routinely collected as evidence by both state and federal law enforcement agents, the Supreme Court ruled in a unanimous opinion in 2014 that police officers must get a warrant to search a cell phone.

A search can be run broadly across a range of content types (e.g., court opinions, dockets and statutes) or more narrowly by jurisdiction, practice area or industry.

Fastcase visualizes its search results in the form of maps playing with relevance, recency and influence of court opinions.

This week, Google Scholar launched Scholar Library, a feature that lets you save search results (including court opinions) in folders, organize them by topic, and use Google to search them.

Similar to that, Ravel designed a court opinions search tool mixing influence, relevance and relations between cases.

Currently, Google Scholar allows you to search and read published opinions of US state appellate and supreme court cases since 1950, US federal district, appellate, tax and bankruptcy courts since...

See the new advanced search preferences in Google Scholar, which allow researchers to find opinions from specific courts.

Justia was selected for excellence in its approach to helping legal researchers search U.S. Supreme Court opinions online.

«The Google Enterprise Search Superstar Award is great recognition for how we use the Google Mini to search U.S. Supreme Court opinions and other... Search Superstar Award is great recognition for how we use the Google Mini to search U.S. Supreme Court opinions and other... search U.S. Supreme Court opinions and other... [more]

«The Google Enterprise Search Superstar Award is great recognition for how we use the Google Mini to search U.S. Supreme Court opinions and other legal databases,» said Justia CEO Tim StSearch Superstar Award is great recognition for how we use the Google Mini to search U.S. Supreme Court opinions and other legal databases,» said Justia CEO Tim Stsearch U.S. Supreme Court opinions and other legal databases,» said Justia CEO Tim Stanley.

You can restrict your search to a specific part or segment of a document, such as the court that heard the case or the judge who wrote the opinion.

Only a handful of courts had begun to publish their opinions on the Internet, and only newly released ones — there were no extensive archives to search.

For the first time, anyone can search and read all California court opinions for free, including landmark rulings on every topic, from same - sex marriage (In re Marriage Cases, 2008) to separation of powers (Houston v. Williams, 1859).

After nearly a year of effort, the Free Law Project has downloaded every opinion and order from the federal courts» PACER system and has made them available for search through its RECAP archive of PACER documents.

With a recently announced addition to the advanced search preferences, Google Scholar now allows you to narrow down your research by searching opinions from specific courts.

In addition to getting to these Points of Law through a court opinion, a researcher can also find them by conducting keyword searches across all case law or specific jurisdictions.

These let you search by attorney name, opinion author, panel members, docket number, court, case name and citation.

So, in short, a Canadian judge wouldn't discount a US District Court opinion merely because it was a District Court opinion, but he or she might make some snarky comments about how far down the food chain his or her opponent had to search.

A Westlaw search reveals that «schmo» has appeared more than a handful of times in federal district court opinions and in the appellate rulings of various state courts.

As we wrote previously in Lawyer Tech Review, the database allows lawyers to search and read published federal and state court opinions in the United States.

Management and Enforcement (protecting copyright and trade - marks, enforcing intellectual property rights, preparing and drafting applications for copyright and trademark registrations, copyright and trademark searches and legal opinions, litigating, overseeing and managing copyright intellectual property infringement matters in Federal Court)

The BVI High Court Registry is due to re-open imminently, enabling the fulfilment of list searches and the issuance of legal opinions.

And I have also written about the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Riley v California, 573 US 1 (2014) where Chief Justice John Roberts held that a warrantless search and seizure of digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest violates the Fourth Amendment and is unconstitutional.

«There is no question that the Court has required either a concern for officer safety or a concern over the preservation of evidence to support the constitutionality of a warrantless search of the area where the defendant was arrested or a search of items near the defendant,» Chief justice Lori Gildea wrote in today's opinion (pdf).

For instance, as best I can tell one can't easily search only court opinions (federal and from all states); the advanced mode let one select «all legal opinions and journals,» or «only US federal court opinions,» or «only court opinions from the following states.»

The Australian courts have followed the French — but not the UK opinion mentioned above — and have found Google liable in defamation for the suggestions that its algorithm makes when someone starts a search.

Currently, Google Scholar allows you to search and read published opinions of US state appellate and supreme court cases since 1950, US federal district, appellate, tax and bankruptcy courts since 1923 and US Supreme Court cases since court cases since 1950, US federal district, appellate, tax and bankruptcy courts since 1923 and US Supreme Court cases since Court cases since 1791.

Although results occasionally bring back court opinions, this is not the right site to search for them.

For example, if you choose the U.S.C. Collection, its search criteria would include a search by Title, U.S. Code Amendment, or U.S. Code Future Amendments (among others), while the Collection of U.S. Court Opinions would include much different search criteria options, such as Party Name or Court Name (among others).

To give «appropriate» an evaluative gloss, allowing a party to delay the commencement of proceedings for some tactical or other reason beyond two years from the date the claim is fully ripened and requiring the court to assess to tone and tenor of communications in search of a clear denial would, in my opinion, inject an unacceptable element of uncertainty into the law of limitation of actions.»

I was thrilled when I discovered wellsettled.com, a new search engine that allows researchers to keyword search the text of the parentheticals used in court opinions.

Second Circuit opinions are available from the Court's website (use Sotomayor as a search term).