Facebook applications include: to - do lists, calendars, file and link sharing, instant messaging, social bookmarking tools (i.e. del.icio.us), RSS feed sharing (i.e. Google Reader), and even the ability to
search library catalogues.
We saw the value of accessing Scribd content categorized by the user who uploaded it, which is analogous to
searching a library catalogue or database for other secondary material written by an author of a specific resource we found useful.
On a teachable moment opportunity: I often used Internet defamation as a teaching example in teaching students how to effectively search the Index to Canadian Legal Literature (ICLL) online (the example also works well in
searching a library catalogue using Library of Congress Subject Headings).
Not exact matches
Most bookstores require an ISBN, and
library catalogues and
search engines prefer them.
With physical books, access to books can be impeded by three barriers: archiving (physical books are expensive to preserve); indexing /
search (even where
catalogues are available online,
searching for relevant books on a given topic can be difficult, and many books are not yet indexed); and obtaining books (once you find a book you think you want, you may need to buy it, borrow it or, if you have access to a
library with the right relationships, attempt to order it via interlibrary loan).
Set - up is free with a
library card from any OverDrive - powered
library, and through an integrated
catalogue, booklovers can
search for the title they want, and depending on the title, choose to either borrow or buy.
I pick through my own collection,
searching for suitable stories, and ordering books directly from the
library catalogue online.
I would
search catalogues from other larger
libraries,
search the legal literature indices (usually on Quicklaw) and, depending on the time frame, either provide a list of cites or track down the items themselves from outside
libraries.
This is a reference to
searching in
library card
catalogues but it's true that, along with all of its faults, the card
catalogue also provided
library users with a reasonable representation of the information space and their place within it.
[late addition: sorry, most of the links above will take you to a message about the session being «timed out» — they were links to
searches I did of the U of A
catalogue, showing the holdings of the law
library.]
In other words, Google says that being able to
search books on its site — which it describes as the equivalent of a giant
library card
catalogue — is not the same as making the books themselves available.
Discovery services are independent of the
library's
catalogue software; the idea is that the
library catalogue is just one of the databases being
searched.
None of the CLIC material is now online, I think, so I
searched through the UVic law
library catalogue.
Alternatively, if your
library doesn't own the print title needed or if you don't find them in the above databases, you can identify other
library holdings of Haitian legal materials in print and electronic format by checking catalogs such as Open WorldCat, AMICUS (choose «entire AMICUS database» to
search through all Canadian
library collections, including the e-content), CCfr (
Catalogue collectif de France), Gallica (the Bibliothèque nationale de France's digital collection), and COPAC (British and Irish university
libraries).