Sentences with phrase «search public court»

Stay up to date on the traffic ticket history of anyone in the U.S. — search public court records for a low fee.

Not exact matches

The meeting, along with the multiple public references to the scandal, may have marked the end of a sordid chapter in the Church's life, although the victim organizations and their lawyers continue the long march through the courts and chanceries in search of payouts that now exceed more than $ 2 billion.

He won the 2008 James P. Garvin award from the New England League of Middle Schools for Teaching Excellence, Service, and Leadership, and he has been a consultant for National Public Radio, USA Today, Court TV, and the Smithsonian Institution's Natural Partners Program and their search for the Giant Squid.

By now, you have probably read that the Alberta Courts public facing judgments database is no longer an active search page, and instead redirects seekers to CanLII.

The popular public - records search site SearchSystems.net has won a federal court judgment of $ 780,000 against the competing site CourtsOnline, according to this press release.

That issue has been hovering above drone operations since 1989, when the Supreme Court in Florida v. Riley ruled that police may conduct warrantless aerial searches from public airspace.

My latest «Ambrogi on Tech» column for the ABA Journal looks at PacerPro, a better way to search the federal courts» Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system.

When upon stopping a person under circumstances prescribed in subdivisions one and two a police officer or court officer, as the case may be, reasonably suspects that he is in danger of physical injury, he may search such person for a deadly weapon or any instrument, article or substance readily capable of causing serious physical injury and of a sort not ordinarily carried in public places by law - abiding persons.

The Supreme Court of Canada restored the trial judge's decision, concluding that the detention and search in view of the public safety risk potentially posed:

It might seem surprising that anyone would think that a free attorney is somehow not a good deal, but it doesn't take much searching to realize that people are more than willing to bash free attorneys, especially public defenders or court - appointed attorneys.

The Supreme Court of Canada held that students are entitled to privacy in a school environment and police do not have the right to conduct searches of public spaces when the search is not authorized by statute or at common law.

The Supreme Court has recently supported the use of random stop and search powers allowed under s60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act on the basis this may save lives.

In March in my ABA Journal column, I reviewed PacerPro, a free service for searching the federal courts» Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system.

The court provided a public reprimand for a lawyer who paid for search results for lawyers on the other side and their client, suggesting that the other side may have ripped off members of the public searching for their names.

The Court decided that making available and managing on the internet a sharing platform which by means of indexation of metadata relating to protected works and the provision of a search engine allows users of that platform to locate those works and to share them in the context of a peer - to - peer network constitutes a «communication to the public», within the meaning of Article 3 (1) of Directive 2001 / 29 / EC.

A public employer's right to search their own computer systems have generally been upheld by Federal courts, as in U.S. v. Angevine and Leventhal v. Knapek, where although an employee expectation of privacy existed, searches were considered reasonable and only a modest intrusion.

The court said that there is a balancing public interest defence against deletion, especially if the individual is involved in public life — but how can the search provider know for sure?

[50]... I think we should now recognize... that the greater the level of discretion left to courts to peer below the language of the claims in a search for «the spirit of the invention», the less the claims can perform their public notice function, and the greater the resulting level of unwelcome uncertainty and unpredictability.

As for other instances where the Public Works Protection Act could be applied, the Court of Appeal in Campanella justified the constitutionality of courthouse searches because there were large signs to alert the public of the fact that searches were taking Public Works Protection Act could be applied, the Court of Appeal in Campanella justified the constitutionality of courthouse searches because there were large signs to alert the public of the fact that searches were taking public of the fact that searches were taking place.

Increasingly, Justia devoted itself to public - interest projects — notably the Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center and Recall Warnings — and to building Justia into the kind of legal resource that FindLaw had earlier foreshadowed, adding such innovations as Justia Dockets & Filings, the Justia Supreme Court Center, BlawgSearch for searching law - related blogs, Blawgs.fm for searching law - related podcasts, and LegalBirds for finding legal professionals on Twitter.

In the Al - Sweady Inquiry, for example, the court criticised the Ministry of Defence for failing to carry out a sufficient search for documents, and emphasised the importance of an adequate document retrieval system, to avoid the waste of much public money and court time.

Although Cranston J accepted that the public interest might require persons to be given access to a court of the purpose of challenging the issue and execution of a search warrant and the retention of material (either in the Administrative Court or the Crown Court under section 59) given the relative weakness of the individual rights at stake and the relatively trivial interference with those rights, it was legitimate for the courts to permit the withholding of PII material in the wider public interest [33,court of the purpose of challenging the issue and execution of a search warrant and the retention of material (either in the Administrative Court or the Crown Court under section 59) given the relative weakness of the individual rights at stake and the relatively trivial interference with those rights, it was legitimate for the courts to permit the withholding of PII material in the wider public interest [33,Court or the Crown Court under section 59) given the relative weakness of the individual rights at stake and the relatively trivial interference with those rights, it was legitimate for the courts to permit the withholding of PII material in the wider public interest [33,Court under section 59) given the relative weakness of the individual rights at stake and the relatively trivial interference with those rights, it was legitimate for the courts to permit the withholding of PII material in the wider public interest [33, 41].

Disclosure of the use of cell site simulators in Canada is a precondition to meaningful debate — in public, in the courts and among law makers — in order to ensure that the use of invasive technology is in compliance with s. 8 of the Charter of Rights that protects all Canadians from unreasonable search and seizure.

To determine if a safety search is reasonably necessary, and therefore justifiable, the court must weigh a number of factors to balance the police duty against the liberty interest in question, including: the importance of the performance of the duty to the public good; the necessity of the interference with individual liberty for the performance of the duty; the extent of the interference with individual liberty.

As such, I don't think the ProCD case applies in my situation due to the qualitative differences between licensing CD - ROMs with vast amounts of information that has been compiled and which has value added search features added to it versus the «sale» of single copies of public domain sheet music (however, a library that creates and licenses for sale a CD - ROM with hundreds of individual pieces of public domain sheet music might be protected by the principles in ProCD since a court might recognize and protect the library's investment of time and money in creating the CD - ROM, but even in that situation, if the library is not otherwise adding value - added information above and beyond the public domain content, it is not obvious that ProCD applies).

Each Court or other provider of public legal information sets its own policies in relation to such matters as privacy (including access by third party search engines), «take down» or replacement of decisions and republication of data by third parties including copyright policies.

Appellate Filing fees Appellate Court Dockets Public case history search Supreme Court Pending Case Report

The statutory scheme of PACE 1984, ss 8 and 15, permits a Magistrates» Court in an ex parte application for a search and seizure warrant to have regard to material that, on public interest grounds, can not be disclosed to a person affected by the warrant or order, even where this material is decisive for the legitimacy of the warrant.

As more court documents come online, court information can be distributed and searched from law offices, home computers or public access terminals.

Regardless of the actual value of knowing a lawyer's trial experience - the value and knowledge of an attorney is much more than trial experience, and the best indicators of experience and judgement are the least public aspects of a lawyer's work - there are two major sources of information: public search engines and court record systems.

This case will be of interest to commissioners, providers and care co-ordinators confirming the boundaries of the scope of the Court of Protection and that this Court does not have a role in adjudicating upon the decision making of a public authority exercising its statutory powers (for example, the execution of search warrants in criminal proceedings).

You may review your case by visiting the Clerk of Court's website at www.brevardclerk.us > Public Records Search > Case Search category.

The clerk of the court can also help with public records searches and provides many other services to the residents living in Lee County.

In addition, any public records searches will be handled by the clerk of courts.

It's not uncommon to need the help of the clerk of the court as you will likely need to pay the county money for something or you will need a public record search done at some point while living in Collier County.

In addition, all public records searches are done through the clerk of the court.

If you need to search the public records database, this will also be handled by the clerk of the courts.

In a public transcription of the latest court proceedings, Oracle's lawyer lashed out at Pichai's company by saying that the search engine giant paid out a huge amount of funds in a deal regarding revenue share with Apple.

In a public transcription of the latest court proceedings, Oracle's lawyer lashed out at Pichai's company by saying that the search engine g...

In 2018, there are secret courts (FISA) who can establish searches of your information and that information is never made public.

Instant Checkmate — Instant Checkmate is a public - records search engine that lets you search for anyone in the U.S. and get immediate access to his or her criminal records, related court documents, addresses, age and known aliases.

The National Criminal Records Search (NCRS) compiles information from various sources including state Departments of Corrections, Administrative Offices of the Court, County Courts, Departments of Public Safety, Bureaus of Investigations, Criminal Apprehensions and Parole and Probations, County arrest data, and other warrant lists and registries.

After the recent closure of a public access computer that had allowed searches of criminal and traffic records led to criticism that public information was now less accessible, the San Luis Obispo (CA) Superior Court officials cited «privacy concerns over outdated criminal and victim information» that was «exposed to background checking contractors» as a reason why the Court removed the public computer terminal on March 19, according to a report in the San Luis Obispo (SLO) Tribune, «SLO court closes public computer.&rCourt officials cited «privacy concerns over outdated criminal and victim information» that was «exposed to background checking contractors» as a reason why the Court removed the public computer terminal on March 19, according to a report in the San Luis Obispo (SLO) Tribune, «SLO court closes public computer.&rCourt removed the public computer terminal on March 19, according to a report in the San Luis Obispo (SLO) Tribune, «SLO court closes public computer.&rcourt closes public computer.»

According to the Public Record Update Newsletter for March 2012, a Public Record Retriever Network (PRRN) Member reports that the San Luis Obispo (California) Superior Court has taken steps to impede criminal record searches for background checks in the county by putting the public record access terminals under lock and key and making them off limits to professional public record researchers and private background screening Public Record Update Newsletter for March 2012, a Public Record Retriever Network (PRRN) Member reports that the San Luis Obispo (California) Superior Court has taken steps to impede criminal record searches for background checks in the county by putting the public record access terminals under lock and key and making them off limits to professional public record researchers and private background screening Public Record Retriever Network (PRRN) Member reports that the San Luis Obispo (California) Superior Court has taken steps to impede criminal record searches for background checks in the county by putting the public record access terminals under lock and key and making them off limits to professional public record researchers and private background screening public record access terminals under lock and key and making them off limits to professional public record researchers and private background screening public record researchers and private background screening firms.

An Ohio court has considered whether a REALTOR ® association's constitution required the association to operate a website where the public could search all properties listed in the association's multiple listing service.