Sentences with phrase «second accident»

After second accident on the floor he went to get cleaning supplies and tried to clean up.Also, he started to pee standing up from the beginning so it made it easier for him to realize what's going on.

Although he recovered from the first issue and raced his way back into the top 10, the second accident was more significant and ended his day.

After a second accident killed the crew of Columbia in 2003, NASA decided to ground the shuttle fleet forever at the end of 2010.

It is the drama lived by the young Armelle, who lost his father in a road accident and whose mother became invalid following a second accident, which prompted the Touraine students interested in this subject.

I visited this dealership out of desperation of needing to trade in my used vehicle after a second accident.

My second accident happened some months later.

In addition, a problem may arise if you have a second accident and it is found to be related to work undertaken for the first.

The second accident was a bad one; the puppy shouldn't have been allowed to roam in the bedroom while his owner was in the shower.

Because we are thorough in our job, we discovered during depositions that this was the second accident in just a few weeks on the job for the driver.

The Plaintiff testified the second accident did not aggravate her symptoms from the first accident and no issue was taken with this assertion at trial.

After a second accident led to further injury, she received medical reports in 2009 indicating that the first trip and fall was a contributing cause of her ongoing severe disability.

Gathering Evidence from the Scene of the Accident This process actually begins the second the accident is over.

In the second accident she was in Victoria, on her way to the airport, when the taxi she was in was struck on... Continue reading →

He pointed to the addendum report of the Dr. Berbrayer, in which it was clear that he was aware of the second accident and nevertheless stated that his opinion was unchanged from his initial report.

The second accident was minor and she «did not experience much of a jolt», and the car accident did not alter her pre-existing symptoms and did not suffer any physical disability.

The only issue at trial was whether the second accident had aggravated or prolonged the effects of the first car accident injuries.

The lower courts dismissed the plaintiff's pretrial motion to exclude all evidence of the second accident.

The trial judge estimated that approximately one hour of trial time was devoted to evidence concerning the second accident.

Second, this was his second accident in only a few weeks on the job.

The defendants claimed that the woman was not suffering from a trauma - related injury and the second accident could have been the cause of her pain.

[148] I conclude that Ms. Nijjar made a good recovery following the first accident, although she continued to experience mild symptoms of discomfort, aggravated by certain activities, up to the time of the second accident.

The company argued that she could not show that it was the second accident that caused her injuries and not the first accident or something else entirely.

The injuries that she sustained in the first accident were aggravated by the second accident.

The defendants were aware of their right to commence an action from the time they discovered they might be liable for some damages from the second accident.

In regards to the second accident, she was a passenger in a vehicle driven by her husband, who was deemed to be at fault for the accident.

The injuries caused by the second accident were more significant and Ms. Nijjar experienced more intensive pain and discomfort of longer duration following the second accident.

The first driver admitted responsibility for the first crash that stopped traffic, but he blamed the second accident and the resulting death of the family entirely on the truck driver who failed to slow down, directly causing the fatal crash.

[149] Ms. Nijjar had more severe symptoms following the second accident and continued to be symptomatic at time of trial.

To survive the defendant's motion, the plaintiff argued that she would be calling her doctor as an expert witness to testify that the second accident caused or substantially aggravated her injuries.

[147] I conclude that Ms. Nijjar suffered soft tissue injuries to the muscles of her neck and back in both the first and the second accident.

I accept that the plaintiff has proved on a balance of probabilities that the symptoms, including non-specific back pain that he currently suffers from, including disc protrusion, were caused by the first accident and the pain from those injuries was aggravated by the second accident.

This litigation arose out of the second accident whereby Mr. Saadati's tractor - truck was hit by a Hummer driven by the Respondent Mr. Moorhead.

Similarly, you need to prove that the injuries you suffered from the second accident are directly related to that driver's negligence and not resulting from the first accident.

The second accident occurred after a semi-truck caught fire on the side of the highway.

During the period following the RTA, the claimant was not losing any money by reason of the first accident, as she would, but for the second accident, have earned no less than she had in her job as a care assistant.

His employer argued that there should have been an apportionment of damages between the three causes of injury: namely the accident at work, the pre-existing degeneration and the second accident.

The RTA, it was argued, had nothing to do with that loss of entitlement, since the loss was suffered before the second accident took place.

Applying the standard «but for» causation test, Ellis should have received 100 % per cent of his damages because the second accident was not a fully blown intervening event as if it had been, the causative potency of the accident at work would have ceased to have effect and Ellis could not have claimed damages after that point.

It was therefore the second accident which caused the material financial loss of earnings capacity.

A year later, he sustained a second accident for which his employer was not liable.

However, the judge took a different approach to apportionment based on various factors which included the medical evidence and that the second accident further contributed to lumbar deterioration.