Here are our guest attorney's responses to a handful of divorce, custody, free speech, and
second amendment questions.
Not exact matches
For example, the majority of the 19th - century courts to consider the
question held that prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the
Second Amendment or state analogues.
As for the rest of your
second question, before the 12th
amendment, the runner up in the election was made vice president, so it actually used to be the norm that the two would be from a different party.
That's why, as MPs start the
second reading of the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill on 6 September, I am tabling an
amendment that would rewrite the referendum
question to allow people to choose from a wider range of voting systems, including properly proportional options such as the additional member system (used in elections for the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Assembly and Greater London Assembly) and the single transferable vote (used in Northern Ireland).
So, to answer the
question: no, there are no real restrictions regarding the size or type of firearm directly under the
second amendment.
She also spoke with her
Second Amendment questioner, seeming to overcome her «dismissive» initial answer despite their meaningful difference on the substance of his
question.
Educators were openly bitter about the confusion the
second question created, along with the politics they blame for fostering the «fear and ignorance» that they believe led to the
amendment's failure.
You literally just defended the first
amendment without
question, and all the «other» group is doing is defending the
second amendment.
I may be misreading your
second paragraph, did you mean that the witness is only required to answer under subpeona, but under subpeona are only allowed to refuse to answer if the
question would require dislcouse of privileged information or violate a 5th
Amendment right?
The
second chapter is the translation of a 1993 Cahiers de droit européen article which ask the
question «Are there Substantive Limits to the
Amendment of the Treaties?».
Regarding the
second part of your
question: The 7th
Amendment does not apply in state court, so any right to a jury trial there would depend upon the constitution of the State of Texas (specifically Article I, Section 15 of the Texas Constitution).
I believe the
question of felons in possession of weapons in relation to the
second amendment has most certainly been carefully crafted by the supreme court in order to uphold the power of the federal government to restrict the r rights of free people.
Southeastern Pennsylvania About Blog Shall Not Be
Questioned» is a blog on firearm public policy, and the
Second Amendment, with a Pennsylvania focus, but covering the whole nation.