Not exact matches
The
second tranche
of the
issue covering the $ 6million deliberately held back after the successful $ 21million ICO in December, comprised investors seeking a $ 600 commitment, and who were given a 24 - hour advantage... after that it was a
case of first come, first served.
The
second writer on each
case is responding to the presentation
of the first, so the
issues are clearly developed and disagreements fully engaged.
It may be that Kelley had «domestic
issues», or «mental health»
issues, or other factors (as is so often the
case, real life stories are usually far more complex than the 24 hour / 24
second sound bite culture we live in) and that his expressions
of hatred against Christianity were only secondary factors, if factors at all.
A
second issue has to do with justice — in this
case, justice for the emerging new nations
of the Third World.
That hasn't been the
case, however, as the MCL33 suffered some kind
of issue on the first three days
of the
second test and has now completed the «full set» by breaking down on the final day as well.
No sooner did the UPMC study
issue, however, then came a
second study by the Virginia Tech - Wake Forest researchers [4]- this one
of an older group
of 9 - to 12 - year - old football players - which found that reducing the number
of head hits in practice did not lead to higher force impacts during games, precisely as they had predicted would be the
case if the amount
of contact was reduced during practice, and pouring a significant amountg
of cold water on the UPMC study.
There was a
second case at the tribunal on the same
issue, called Secretary
of State for the Home Department v Pankina.
Chautauqua County Court Judge David Foley dismissed the charge
of second degree manslaughter against 34 year - old Thomas Jadlowski in a ruling
issued on Wednesday, saying District Attorney Patrick Swanson erred when he presented the
case in front
of a grand jury while seeking an indictment.
«When the
second grand jury was presented with all
of the evidence and was
issued the proper instructions in deciding the
case, they courageously came to the right and proper decision,» he said in a statement.
Because a quake's strength isn't clear at first rupture, emergency response managers face a choice when
issuing warnings:
Issue alerts early and often (left), which could provide as much as 48 seconds of warning that light shaking might occur but risk false alarms; or wait to issue alerts until the size of the quake is better known (right) but risk the warnings arriving too late — providing an 8 - second warning in this hypothetical
Issue alerts early and often (left), which could provide as much as 48
seconds of warning that light shaking might occur but risk false alarms; or wait to
issue alerts until the size of the quake is better known (right) but risk the warnings arriving too late — providing an 8 - second warning in this hypothetical
issue alerts until the size
of the quake is better known (right) but risk the warnings arriving too late — providing an 8 -
second warning in this hypothetical
case.
In
case where further environmental solutions were implemented, e-EcoSolutions will perform a
second and final audit following to the incorporation
of these new solutions, and subsequently
issue your Green Schools certification.
The
issue with HFT, however, is there are
cases where the market goes against the HFT algorithm and the algorithm continues to execute trades driving prices up or down by large amounts in the matter
of minutes or even
seconds.
For the
second time, an Ohio bill was introduced to make modest improvements in animal cruelty penalties and establish the authority
of judges to
issue orders
of protection for pets in
cases of domestic violence.
And, in
case you missed it, you're enjoying
Issue Number Two, looking back at the
second week
of December 2015.
Against certain enemies, I was able to roll between the legs without
issues and in
case of some others (especially bosses) I kept rolling into them only to be hacked to death, a problem which was most prevalent against the
second boss.
Nearly all
of the assertions by the Australian blogger in the
second chart were inflammatory and untrue, with only thin threads leading to legitimate
issues (one being that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, as noted in a review by the Dutch environment agency, has traditionally focused its summaries on worst -
case outcomes and left out potential positive effects or other factors, like population growth, that contribute to climate vulnerability).
On October 1, the Supreme Court heard a
second round
of arguments in the
case specifically concerning the
issue of the extraterritoriality
of the US Alien Tort Statue (ATS).
Feed it to CARA, and in just a few
seconds it will spit out a list
of cases that are relevant to the
issue but that your opponent has left out.
In the
case of currency, live checks, and items 1 - 5
of the
second list, the basic
issue is that it is customary to transfer and assign the rights arising under these documents by transferring physical possession
of them, without recording the transfer in a central registry.
For instance, in a 1968
case, a Swiss court refused to
issue an enforcement order on the grounds that the arbitral tribunal had not complied with the agreement
of the parties that «all disputes should be settled in one and the same arbitral proceedings» and instead conducted the arbitration in two stages.904 In a 2001
case, the Italian Supreme Court enforced a first award but not a
second award made with respect to the same dispute.
This
case emphasizes that it is the condominium corporation's duty to fully investigate the cause
of any
second - hand smoke migration, especially when the owner complaining has health
issues resulting from, or exacerbated by, the
second - hand smoke.
This is the
second in a series
of posts containing summaries
of Pennsylvania
case law on the
issue of double dipping in divorce.
[13] On the
second issue, the
case management judge concluded that the
issues would require a prolonged examination
of documents and a scientific examination within the meaning
of the sub-rule, but rejected the argument that the examination
of these documents and expert reports could not be made conveniently with a jury.
So let's give Mr Justice Coulson an eight per cent over base increment in his salary for venturing into the Late Payment
of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 (LPCD (I) A 1998) in Ruttle Plant Hire Ltd v Secretary
of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2008] EWHC 730 (TCC), [2008] All ER (D) 191 (Apr) which involved the determination
of 17
issues in the
second round
of preliminary
issues in the
case.
On Wednesday, the
Second Circuit
issued an opinion on an interesting question
of trial practice and procedure: Is it permissible for the jury in a criminal
case to take the indictment home to read on their own time?
A fascination
of this
case is to watch a judge treading a careful path between the technicalities
of issue estoppel and a possible strike out on the one hand, balanced against a clear emphasis on the court's duty to protect the welfare
of a child in the widest possible sense: the first a matter
of analysis
of law, the
second a matter
of pure discretion.
--
Second, in my view the study would have gained from fleshing out in greater detail some
of the key
cases with a more detailed treatment
of the competing arguments in order to add not just colour to the text but also to allow a deeper understanding
of the
issues — at least for the reader.
A week later, the
second case Mr Mark Sands (as Trustee in Bankruptcy
of Mr Tarlochan Singh) v Mr Tarlochan Singh & Others [2016] EWHC 636 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 209 (Mar) revisited (along with other matters) the
issue of whether a sealed financial order and a consequential deed
of trust dealing in the former matrimonial home could be set aside on the basis that it was either a transaction at an undervalue for the purposes
of s 339
of IA 1986.
This is the
second time that the ECJ was confronted with the
issue of trade in seals, after having dismissed an earlier appeal to the order
of the General Court in an action for annulment
of Regulation No 1007/2009 on the basis
of lack
of admissibility (
Case T - 18 / 10, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami I, EU: T: 2011:419).
If the Federal Circuit also held claim 8
of the» 915 patent invalid, that fact alone would require a third trial in the first Apple - Samsung
case (and unlike in the
second one, the majority
of all products would be at
issue in that event).
A large number
of pleadings were exchanged before, the
second defendant
issued an application in the TCC to transfer the
case from the county court to the TCC under CPR 30.3 (2) and para 2.1
of CPR Pt 60 PD.
Second, it raises the
issue of whether or not a judge ought to decide, in advance
of the hearing, and in the absence
of oral submissions from counsel, whether or not oral evidence is necessary in a particular
case.
Such a
case may start from Ukraine in terms
of negotiations, then proceed judicially in Greece, security measures (ship arrest) may be taken in Romania; when it comes to enforcement
of the judgement, and a Russian insurer is involved refusing to pay under LOI
issued for release
of the ship in Romania, you have to initiate enforcement proceedings in Russia, whereas the said vessel may have been arrested by the claimants for the
second time in Bangladesh, on the same claim against the new ship owner, where the court decides that it will hear the
case against the latter on the merits.
Article 1, 1st Protocol Article 1 contains three rights, but the one most in
issue in these
cases is likely to be in the
second sentence
of the first paragraph: «No one shall be deprived
of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles
of international law.»
Accordingly, the tribunal in this
case should have asked itself two questions when deciding the
issue of dishonesty: first, whether the first appellant had acted dishonestly by the ordinary standards
of reasonable and honest people; and,
second, whether he had been aware that by those standards he was acting dishonestly.
Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust v Armstrong [2006] IRLR 124 (Court
of Appeal), and on a
second appeal, [2010] ICR 674 (EAT) Instructed throughout this long running equal pay
case which, on appeal, raised
issues of the selection
of comparators and the material factor defence in equal pay claims.
The
case presents two procedural
issues under the AIA trial format: First, whether the PTAB should construe claims during an IPR using the USPTO's «broadest reasonable interpretation» (or «BRI») construction standard; and
second, whether the PTAB's decision to institute review is subject to review by the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Second, discovery requests must now be relevant and «proportional» to the needs
of the
case, with proportionality being measured against the importance
of the
issues and the amount in controversy, among other factors.
This
issue often arises in the
case of second marriages.
His
case had failed in the Tribunals but the Court accepted that it raised
issues of special public importance such as to surmount the «
second appeals» test, notwithstanding that it had been twice refused permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal.
This style
of anonymous judgment has generally been focused on constitutional
issues down three different tracks: first, reactively to federal but not provincial reference
cases;
second, defensively on
issues impacting directly on the judiciary; and third, proactively on constitutional
issues at the Court's internal discretion.
The
second set
of «By the Court» judgments involves
cases that deal with
issues that relate directly to the judiciary as an institution, sometimes focusing on the Supreme Court itself and sometimes involving more general matters.
The
second case study deals with a very different
issue, namely «the» hot intellectual - property debate
of summer 2014: If a monkey takes a selfie, who owns the copyright?
I suspect that my client will win on that
issue, but if his predecessor in title had simply given notice to himself as required by statute and kept proof
of doing so, this
case might never have gone to court, instead
of having to be litigated to the
second highest possible appellate court in the land, saving huge amounts
of money and time and aggravation and this would have made his successor's title more secure.
The areas
of concern included avoiding bad faith, dealing with a
second case arising out
of the same accident, apportioning payment
of the insurance proceeds, and claims handling
issues.
In the
second case, SAS Institute, Inc. v. Iancu, No. 16 - 969 (U.S. Apr. 24, 2018), the Court rejected the USPTO's interpretation
of 35 U.S.C. § 318 (a), which requires the Patent Trial and Appeal Board («PTAB») to
issue a final written decision on the claims challenged by a petitioner at the conclusion
of an IPR trial.
The majority did however reject (at paras 66 - 78) IFP's contention that correctness should be the standard for all
issues given the circumstances
of this
case in which one judge conducted the trial but a
second judge rendered judgement.
The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
issued a
second Compliance Order against the Government
of Canada on the First Nations child welfare
case on September 15, 2016.
The
case then went forward and Judge Chin ultimately
issued his decision
of finding that there were no copyright violations and that brought the
case to the
Second Circuit.
Medical Malpractice / Birth Injuries: In a medical malpractice or birth injury
case, keep or obtain copies
of all medical records that pertain to the medical treatment at
issue, as well as those related to any
second or third opinions obtained from other health care providers.