But as this unmaking of religion reveals that religion is «true», in the sense that it is an invention of human beings to compensate for and to sublimate their real wretchedness,
a second kind of criticism has to follow: religion has to be made false, i.e., the secular world has to be changed.
Not exact matches
Second, preparation for leadership in academic disciplines that claim to be scientific and rarely includes the
kind of study that facilitates radical self -
criticism.
Second, the fact that I failed to consult the Vatican's statements on the subject is hollow
criticism, given that the Vatican's position on these
kinds of issues is hardly any great secret.
The
second is the
kind of criticism that you just have to find a way to ignore, because it brings you down and it's not constructive.
A
second criticism is that, because the term «superfood» is not scientific, it can mean very little and prompt some consumers to eat one
kind of food over another.
Xu's, or I should say MadeIn's, levelling
of value structures by means
of consumption, done in the name
of «the production
of creativity,» risks a critique
of accelerationism; but leaving art
criticism aside for just a
second, this really is one
of its
kind in history.