Local school districts and their unions may negotiate
a second measure of student learning that would lead to other scoring outcomes.
Not exact matches
A
second study, recently published in the Proceedings
of the National Academy
of Sciences (PNAS) by Gary Chamberlain, using the same data as Chetty and his colleagues, provides fodder both for skeptics and supporters
of the use
of value - added: while confirming Chetty's finding that the teachers who have impacts on contemporaneous
measures of student learning also have impacts on earnings and college going, Chamberlain also found that test - scores are a very imperfect proxy for those impacts.
The
second, acquiring «civic skills» in the classroom, is a
measure of what
students have
learned to prepare them to be civically engaged in the future.
In essence, therefore, our two
measures of teaching quality reflect, in the first case, value added (or «deep
learning») that is transferrable to subsequent classes in the subject, and, in the
second case, inspiration, as indicated by the ability to convert
students to a subject that they had not previously planned on studying in depth.
The
second is changing the statutory requirements for teachers» performance reviews, particularly to allow
measures of student learning instead
of or in addition to
student growth «determined solely by state assessment.»
And the
second piece, though, is broadening out and redefining accountability so that we can try new things, so that it's not just about the two tests, that it's about high school graduation, but not just about high school graduation, that it's about other ways
of measuring student progress and thinking about how kids
learn, and engaging kids like through project - based instruction.
A
second study, recently published in the Proceedings
of the National Academy
of Sciences (PNAS) by Gary Chamberlain, using the same data as Chetty and his colleagues, provides fodder both for skeptics and supporters
of the use
of value - added: while confirming Chetty's finding that the teachers who have impacts on contemporaneous
measures of student learning also have impacts on earnings and college going, Chamberlain also found that test scores are a very imperfect proxy for those impacts.
As examples, studies that use
student test performance to
measure teachers» effectiveness — adjusted for prior achievement and background characteristics — demonstrate that, on average, teachers add more to their
students»
learning during their
second year
of teaching than they do in their first year, and more in their third year than in their
second.
Well - designed accountability policy, on its own, does four things well: first, it requires participants to believe that all
students can
learn and succeed;
second, it
measures the academic progress
of all
students over time; third, it highlights gaps between different groups
of students (be they racial, geographic, socio - economic, special education and gifted
students, or English language proficiency); and fourth, it assigns consequences for not meeting goals around
student progress.