Not exact matches
The court is faced with the ugly possibility that EPA adopted a methodology for each chapter (a book on
second hand smoke by EPA), without explanation, based on the
outcome sought in that chapter.
This was the
second in a two - part series — the first one lays out the three levers corporate counsel can pull when
seeking to drive legal department efficiency, and this one shows three different
outcomes in three different corporations and in three different industries.
If it's the
second outcome you're
seeking (and I can only guess that's the right answer), why in the world are you screening for the former while collecting virtually no data on the latter?