Sentences with phrase «second piece of evidence»

Second piece of evidence to consider: After the first drink, HE offered to order food.

The second piece of evidence is that Venable registered its domain name on March 5, 1994, and a search of the Internet Archive was able to find Venable's traffic logs back to June 12, 1994.

The second piece of evidence was the claim that global temperatures increased 0.6 °C (1 °F) in the last approximately 130 years.

This is the second piece of evidence: a provable mechanism by which energy can be trapped in the atmosphere.

The second piece of evidence that points to this overestimation of federal student loan repayment benefits can be seen in the last question.

The second piece of evidence we like to bring forward is also found on the Member Hookup homepage.

A second piece of evidence suggesting a long history of leprosy lies within the bacterial genome.

Not exact matches

When we read all of her comments (and I did a second reading of them this evening), we find her referencing very specific pieces of documentary evidence.

Your second option is to throw out all that evidence, say it rained for a really long time to create the big flood and have no earthly way of explaining how it could happen and then your only real issue is the explanation of how noah was able to fit every piece of flora and fauna onto his ark, his family and enough food to survive for 40 days at sea.

In the second part of New Scientist's special investigation, we show that the odds attached to a piece of DNA evidence can vary enormously

The second is that one or two discrete and readily understandable pieces of data will be seized upon as definitive evidence that the schools are «failing» or, alternatively, «turning the corner.»

Second, the only piece of evidence that Fordham presents to support the claim that state testing requirements improve performance at choice schools is the finding that scores rose when Milwaukee private choice schools were required to take the high stakes state test.

Nowhere was the mysterious affinity more in evidence than on the gallery's second floor rotunda, where a super-refined Donald Judd wall piece, Untitled (Bernstein 78 - 70), 1978, was hung above a rough Andre floor work, 32 - Part Reciprocal Invention (1971), composed of lengths of steel rods used to make reinforced concrete.

The latest evidence has come in the last few days, with the release of «Before the Flood,» a sobering new climate film (watchable in full online) featuring Leonardo DiCaprio, and the second season of «Years of Living Dangerously,» a series of celebrity - guided, but substantive, pieces on human - driven climate change and the clean - energy challenge.

A second approach is to post a comment with the stated or implied message, «This is a piece of evidence supporting my conclusions», without suggesting that no contradictory evidence exists.

I do not claim for a second that a single painting provides evidence of temperatures that can be relied on to fractions of a degree, merely that it well descrbes the changes that were taking place at the time and such pieces have received a great deal of academic investigation, some of which has been quoted to you.

Since to me (and many scientists, although some wanted a lot more corroborative evidence, which they've also gotten) it makes absolutely no sense to presume that the earth would just go about its merry way and keep the climate nice and relatively stable for us (though this rare actual climate scientist pseudo skeptic seems to think it would, based upon some non scientific belief — see second half of this piece), when the earth changes climate easily as it is, climate is ultimately an expression of energy, it is stabilized (right now) by the oceans and ice sheets, and increasing the number of long term thermal radiation / heat energy absorbing and re radiating molecules to levels not seen on earth in several million years would add an enormous influx of energy to the lower atmosphere earth system, which would mildly warm the air and increasingly transfer energy to the earth over time, which in turn would start to alter those stabilizing systems (and which, with increasing ocean energy retention and accelerating polar ice sheet melting at both ends of the globe, is exactly what we've been seeing) and start to reinforce the same process until a new stases would be reached well after the atmospheric levels of ghg has stabilized.

Phil Jones, Director of the CRU produced the second piece of the 2001 Report used to claim evidence of human impact on temperatures.