Sentences with phrase «second point i make»

The second point I make above is more about creating things to look forward to.

The second point made by Einstein's story poses a second problem for today's science: that the rise of tomorrow's brilliant scientists is not assured.

I second the points made by Ramez Naam about the trad pub income streams that aren't reflected here.

This is supported by the second point made earlier; for instance, these policy changes can leave borrowers with higher loan balances with public service income levels.

I think the second point you make is important.

Not exact matches

On the second point, Eve has made the mattress market sexy.

Musk tried to further clarify a point that he made on Tesla's second quarter earnings call, when he insisted that Tesla doesn't have a demand problem.

There is an endless supply of business statistics (proving most any point you want to make), research and studies (many with surprising results), and interesting real - life stories (of business success and failure), all available within seconds by doing a simple Google search.

16 - 17 points: You've made it to second base but need work to get home.

A second point worth making has to do with truth.

At the same time, Elliott's assets have nearly doubled to roughly $ 39 billion, including $ 5 billion it raised in a 23 - hour span in May, making it more than twice the size of the second - biggest activist hedge fund, Dan Loeb's Third Point.

The second key point in keeping conflict in check is to make sure you inform yourself about the real, underlying causes of the problem before you step in.

Even the 4 % annual total return of the S&P 500 in the 15 years since the 2000 peak has been made possible only by driving current valuations to the second most extreme point in U.S. history.

Bud Light is so bullish on «Dilly Dilly» that it is making the made - up medieval beer toast the focal point of three new ads that will climax with a 60 - second Super Bowl spot.

But let's separate that for a second from the point I'm making, which is this hopefully not temporary, but maybe temporary, move to high deductible plans is driving change in the marketplace that is resulting in better care for consumers, from my point of view.

The second says that it doesn't make sense to refinance if you're going to move before your loans hit its «breakeven» point.

A case in point, for one organization I conducted buyer persona and insight research for, potential buyers in a mid-market segment made their first sales contact as part of their second step of evaluation.

The Confessions do not in the first place talk about God; Marion makes a great point of saying that the second grammatical person prevails here over the third person.?

You seem to believe that you are aware of what everyone is thinking, as this is the second time you have made a sweeping blanket statement... but to answer your question: I can assure you if that woman did see an angel telling her to kill her children, it certainly would have been a fallen angel, or demon if you prefer and not from God... If you had even a basic understanding of angels and fallen angels and the protection of God, this would be a moot point... but it appears that you want to play the game of how ridiculous can I be...

When women routinely win Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry or medicine, when a woman becomes a world chess champion, when a woman conceives and develops a brand new computer chip that represents a significant advancement over quad cores, when a woman invents warp drive or phasers, when a woman solves an «insolvable» math problem, when a woman, while working with the Large Hadron Collider, discovers the now - hypothetical Higgs Boson to be an actual scalar subatomic particle, when a woman figures out how to pinpoint the exact location of an electron at any point in time, when a woman working for Merck or Pfizer develops a remedy for Alzheimer's disease, when a woman's baseball team can defeat the New York Yankees, when a woman can bench press six hundred pounds, run the 100 meter dash in under nine seconds or set a world record in the high jump, then the fairer sex will have made an advance or contribution unlike any it has made before.

And so we tacitly concede that the second - century heretic, Marcion, had a point: the God who created and rules this world is not praiseworthy, because God neither made a world that is disaster - proof nor arrests the consequences of our sins.

It's the lying and deception that can destroy trust in these situations more than almost anything else, and the second episode even makes it a point to try and get that across through slapstick humor, until it ditches that initial argument altogether and starts becoming a wacky comedy in full with all of the usual trappings.

Here at the outset let us take care to make it clear that the question of an historical point of departure arises even for a contemporary disciple; for if we are not careful here, we shall meet with an insuperable difficulty later (in Chapter V), when we come to deal with the case of the disciple whom we call the disciple at second hand.

In the second section of our considerations we should like to make several points explaining the possibility of a «democratic» development of the Church without, however, claiming completeness.

If Herberg's «triple melting pot» idea is fairly well remembered today, the second point Herberg sought to make is more often forgotten.

The prospect that second - generation revisions of these will be made seems rather remote at this point, though much of the work of the past decade appears blatantly sexist to present - day eyes.

He makes two points: first, the raw alcohol intake from a communion cup or chalice is so very small as to be harmless; second, in the communion service the alcohol — rather than being destructive to the alcoholic — serves a positive and even redeeming purpose.

But enough of this point; the distinctions we have already made will help me deal more briefly with Cobb's second main line of criticism.

Sermons that make this second point about poor people tithing often transition over to Matthew 19:29 (or Mark 10:29 - 30) where Jesus promises that those who give up relationships, possessions, homes, and land for His sake, will receive one - hundred times as much in this life and in the life to come.

In the second part, we shall point to the specific conditions in India which has made inter-religious conversion an issue of communal politics and shall also look at some aspects of the history of the controversy whether the solution lies in depoliticising religious conversion or in outlawing it.

But before we come to that discussion, it will be useful for us to turn our attention to the question of «resurrection» — first, the resurrection of Jesus Christ, about which so much of the earliest Christian writing found in the New Testament, and so much of the Christian experience of discipleship, turns; and second, to consider the point of the continuing Christian affirmation that those who have responded to the event of Christ are themselves made «sharers in Christ's resurrection».

And this point is also relevant to the charge made by Hartshorne and others that, unlike Whitehead, Bergson's attachment in continuity leads him unwittingly to deny any definite units of reality.31 And second, Whitehead does hold that spatialization, such as conceptualization and quantification require, falsifies experience.

All measurement is not measurement of lengths on a straight line; there is a second most important measurement of intervals, independent of such measurement of lengths, the estimation of angles, or, what comes to the same thing, of ratios and arcs of circles to the whole circumference, In point of fact, it is by angular measurement that we habitually estimate temporal intervals, whenever we appeal to a watch or clock, and in the prehistoric past the first rough estimates of intervals within the natural day must presumably» have been made, independently of measurement of lengths, by this same method, with the sky for clock - face.

The second point to make... turns on the theological role of the editors in shaping the biblical material to render it in light of the larger literary collection.

Less persuasive, to me at least, is the claim that this probably continued until 1931, the year in which Lewis converted to Christianity (and would now think a relation with a married woman to be wrong) Wilson's way of making this point is, however, an instance of a very undesirable trait in his writing: the tendency to assert indirectly and to be glib while seeming to eschew it: «It would be far too glib to suggest that he consciously made the second change, to adopt Christianity, merely to give himself an excuse to abandon sexual relations with Mrs. Moore, whatever the nature of those relations had been.»

He makes two fine points: First, regardless of inner desires, we Christians are accountable to behavioral standards set forth in classic Christian sexual ethics, which inevitably revolve around the Christian teaching on marriage; and second, the current definitions of internal desires are a mess.

We can summarize the discussion up to this point by saying that the literary form of Mark's tomb pericope shows definite signs of having developed in three stages, consisting of two appendices with one third final addition (leaving aside the fact that in the second century a still further addition of Mark 16:9 — 20 was made) and that because of this, it may not have been part of the author's original plan as he set out to write his Gospel.

As pointed out at the time, this was in contradiction to statements he had made previously, inwhich he had repudiated the idea of human cloning: «Human cloning has grabbed people's imagination, but that is merely a diversion — and one we personally regret, and find distasteful,» he had said in The Second Creation, the book on Dolly's cloning which he co-authored with embryologist Kenneth Campbell in 2002.

In explaining the Day of Resurrection and the World to Come, and in describing the stages of the Second World, the Qur» an has made the point clear to us in a simple, straightforward, and intelligent way, and has unveiled the secret.

I just posted this on another topic... change a few words, youll get the point: In an ideal situation, «World Religions» would be part of a «World History» class, unfortunately, in the USA, there are far too many conservative Christians with power to rewrite history, make whole groups of people second class citizens by making laws against them, and travel the world trying to convert non-Christians through our Military, Politicians, humanitarian efforts and more.

Professor Trinterud made his second point as follows: «Acts such as prayer, thanksgiving, breaking of bread, are regarded in the New Testament as but an aspect of the «service of God,» and that not the controlling or central aspect.

The second subtle point that Maritain makes about practical intellect begins again with the fact that ethical and political action are always about existents.

I do not do this in a spirit of enumeration and description, [10] but rather, recognising our situatedness and the search for Jesus in an Indian context, offer these as a contribution to an ongoing dialogue where we take seriously the point made by Robert M. Grant, regarding the writers in the second century that

Then again I guess you could make the argument that every rock on Earth is technically space rock at one point or another when we first formed so I guess I continually get my wish every second I take a step, but lets just say for arguments sake that rocks that didn't form on earth are pretty neat.

He writes,» [Whitehead's] argument then makes the second and crucial point that this sense of reality which underlies all our experience comprises infinitely more than is sometimes supposed....

In light of this discussion of presuppositional analysis, it is perhaps worth making one final point concerning the relation between such a second - order type of procedure and the foregoing discussion of the first - order procedure of presenting the data of experience as evidence.

The mention of «existentialism» here, while I intended it in a slightly different way, brings us to the second point which I wish to make.

The second point to be made is that the quantitative order is not the only kind of order, even in science.

Second, while I hate to agree with an atheist, this Mehta guy makes a great point; it's hard to experiment with atheism when it requires a decided belief.

I will give an overly simplistic example, but it makes the point: If there is a criminal who murdered someone, and he is imprisoned but due to a judge's leniency, the criminal is not put in jail but is let back onto the streets, the chance of him murdering again is high, and if he does so, the judge has been, in effect, cruel to that second person who was murdered.