Specifically, the majority had to ignore a key term of the provision's first sentence and ignore the
entire second sentence.
Just to say I've noticed a little typo in your book on page 8, second paragraph,
second sentence says «It's can be hard at first...»
The letter's
second sentence optimistically notes the $ 500 billion that President - elect Trump pledged during the campaign to spend on infrastructure.
The second sentence was designed to avoid becoming a hard target by instead embracing Trump's espoused motive.
For example,
the second sentence of the speech was: «Five score years ago a great American in whose symbolic shadow we stand today signed the Emancipation Proclamation.»
Now that we are in
the second sentence, I can relay the Institute of International Finance's latest tally of global debt: $ 291 trillion at current exchange rates.
Santa: I think he might mean
my second sentence where I called Ham a con - man and referred to his followers as sheep.
A period at the end of a sentence is nice, too, and a verb would help tremendously on
that second sentence as well.
The second sentence obscures all that.
As for
your second sentence, I haven't the foggiest clue as to what you're alluding to.
Ironically enough, that
second sentence is almost word - for - word what a Christian is supposed to do in life.
If you were to do the same thing with
the second sentence in Ephesians 2:8 - 9, you would once again discover that the big idea, the main point is the phrase, by grace you have been saved.
Stopped reading after
the second sentence «He is the only salvation for the world» Not according to 2 / 3rds of the worlds population Please provide evidence of this He (Jesus) has done a sh!tty job so far.
Equally telling was
the second sentence of the preface to the 1991 study, which began by announcing that it intended to «stimulate reflection and dialogue with Scripture.»
Re-read
the second sentence of this paragraph.)
The second sentence... I'd be joking if I said «I bet if you look in the dictionary under Oxymoron that's what would be written there»... but I wouldn't be joking by much.
The second sentence is equally important: «Whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother, and sister, and mother.»
(The content of
the second sentence could vary quite widely depending on how the text is interpreted and applied.)
It has been ignored in the first part of
the second sentence because we have too hastily identified it with the primordial envisagement of all forms.
the second sentence «The company opposes providing some contraceptives to employees through its company health care plan on religious grounds, saying some contraceptive products, like the morning after pill, equate to abortion.
In
the second sentence, descriptive biblical theology has «laid bare [a] blueprint [as a] common denominator.»
You made everything you said irrelevant by
your second sentence.
Comment on
the second sentence that rules out the supernatural having an influence on a casual chain, hence no god required.
You completely avoided
the second sentence, no supernatural god required.
So when, in
the second sentence, he writes that all men are created equal, he must mean all people — whatever their color, sex, age, or status.»
That second sentence is definitely a keeper.
As for
your second sentence, you could leave out the «for CNN» phrase and it would be even more true.
The phrase «for the transformation of the world» and
the second sentence were recent additions — an addition that I very much agree with.
The second sentence in the quotation above represents the best political wisdom, but unfortunately such wisdom does not often flourish in the midst of revolutions or of the struggles to defend the gains of revolution.
He has split
the second sentence in half, losing the connection between a fact and its consequence.
Phrases with «second sentence»