Sentences with phrase «secondary outcome measures»

A unique aspect of our trial is the inclusion of a range of secondary outcome measures including those highly valued by patients themselves.
Models will be fitted for primary and secondary outcome measures.
Primary outcome measures are: carer preparedness measured by the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale28 and carer distress measured by the Distress Thermometer (DT).29, 30 Secondary outcome measures are carer anxiety and depression measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), 31 carer quality of life measured by the Caregiver Quality of Life Index — Cancer, 32 carer competence measured by the Carer Competence Scale, 33 carer supportive care needs measured by the «Partner and Caregivers Supportive Care Needs Scale ’34 and «Brain Tumour Specific Supportive Carer Needs for Carers Survey ’35 and health economic cost - consequences measured using a checklist of services used.
Outcome data (relevant details on all primary and secondary outcome measures used, and summary data, including means, standard deviations (SDs), confidence intervals (CIs) and significance levels for continuous data and proportions for dichotomous data).
Secondary outcome measures were body dissatisfaction, drive for thinness, and bulimia (Eating Disorders Inventory [EDI]-RRB-; body dissatisfaction (clinician rated); and food restriction.
Primary and secondary outcome measures The tools were assessed by the item response theory, classical test theory (reliability and construct validity) and differential item functioning.
Secondary outcome measures included the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).23 This was developed in the UK and includes prosocial as well as antisocial behaviours.
Table 2 shows least - squares mean scores on primary and secondary outcome measures by condition, mean change scores from pretreatment to posttreatment, and within - group effect sizes for each group.
Primary and secondary outcome measures Self - reported exposure to psychological, physical and sexual intimate partner violence.
According to resource - oriented psychotherapy principles, 39 51 participants also reported strengthened personal resources and self - management abilities (see the Primary and secondary outcome measures section).
Results: main outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, narrative findings, adherence levels, patient satisfaction and effect sizes against intervention components.
Primary and secondary outcome measures The Perceived Stress Scale, the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment - 7 and the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (for depression).
Secondary outcome measures Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS), EuroQol Five - item, Five - level (EQ - 5D - 5L) Scale for quality of life, modified Client Service Receipt Inventory for costs, Medical Informant Satisfaction Scale (MISS), qualitative interviews with 14 patients and 13 practice staff about feasibility and acceptability of trial design.
The only difference between the groups for secondary outcome measures was that parents in the intervention group were more satisfied with treatment at 2 months follow up (table ⇓).
Secondary outcome measures include serum antibody levels and activity of anti - FMP 2.1 measured against recombinant 3D7 AMA1 at baseline and at specified times during and after immunization.
Secondary outcome measures were UPDRS total and subscale scores; discontinuation rates due to adverse events, inefficacy, and death; and individual adverse events.
Averaged over a four - year follow - up period, operatively treated patients at least 80 years of age, had significantly greater improvement in all primary and secondary outcome measures compared with patients at least 80 years of age who received nonsurgical treatment.
Secondary outcome measures included time to first exacerbation, severity of exacerbations, quality of life and changes in lung function as measured by spirometry.
Our secondary outcome measures were obstetric interventions and adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes.
Secondary outcome measures were intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), infant respiratory distress syndrome (IRDS), prolongation of pregnancy, GA at delivery, birthweight, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and number of days on ventilation support.
Secondary outcomes Measured changes in weight and PA and reported diet and psychosocial measures between baseline and 12 - week follow - up.

Not exact matches

Secondary outcomes included: perinatal mortality, stillbirths, measures of morbidity, quality of care, and institutional deliveries
Measures of maternal satisfaction were reported in one study of 15 women, but there were insufficient data to draw any conclusions; no other secondary outcomes were reported for women with a multiple pregnancy in either study.
Measures ofmaternal satisfaction were reported in one study of 15 women, but there were insufficient data to draw any conclusions; no other secondary outcomes were reported for women with multiple births in either study.
The study is investigator led and has therefore focused on clinical need, targeting patients with progressive multiple sclerosis in whom most disability is incurred... The study also reports a predominant effect on neurodegenerative rather than inflammatory outcomes, suggesting a novel mechanism of action that might be suitable as combination treatment with immunomodulatory treatments... Further phase 3 studies to measure the effect of simvastatin on sustained disability, particularly in patients with non-relapsing secondary progressive and primary progressive multiple sclerosis, are clearly needed, but this trial represents a promising point from which to develop trials of progressive disease.»
Secondary endpoints included cough severity, urge to cough, quality of life, and global ratings of change, as measured by patient - reported outcomes.
But just before the final data on the last patient was collected in October, Lilly changed the outcomes so that the drug's success would rest solely on the cognitive changes, with the functional ones as a secondary measure of success.
We set out to test whether, compared with placebo, supplementation would increase fat - free mass (FFM) 10 (primary outcome) while improving strength, nutritional status, inflammation, and measures of quality of life and physical function (secondary outcomes).
Kate Copping - Westgarth Primary School, Victoria Using Data to Develop Collaborative Practice and Improve Student Learning Outcomes Dr Bronte Nicholls and Jason Loke, Australian Science and Mathematics School, South Australia Using New Technology for Classroom Assessment: An iPad app to measure learning in dance education Sue Mullane - Sunshine Special Developmental School, Victoria Dr Kim Dunphy - Making Dance Matter, Victoria Effective Differentiation: Changing outcomes in a multi-campus school Yvonne Reilly and Jodie Parsons - Sunshine College, Victoria Improving Numeracy Outcomes: Findings from an intervention program Michaela Epstein - Chaffey Secondary College, Victoria Workshop: Developing Rubrics and Guttman Charts to Target All Students» Zones of Proximal Development Holly Bishop - Westgarth Primary School, Victoria Bree Bishop - Carwatha College P - 12, Victoria Raising the Bar: School Improvement in action Beth Gilligan, Selina Kinne, Andrew Pritchard, Kate Longey and Fred O'Leary - Dominic College, Tasmania Teacher Feedback: Creating a positive culture for reform Peta Ranieri - John Wollaston Anglican Community School, Western AOutcomes Dr Bronte Nicholls and Jason Loke, Australian Science and Mathematics School, South Australia Using New Technology for Classroom Assessment: An iPad app to measure learning in dance education Sue Mullane - Sunshine Special Developmental School, Victoria Dr Kim Dunphy - Making Dance Matter, Victoria Effective Differentiation: Changing outcomes in a multi-campus school Yvonne Reilly and Jodie Parsons - Sunshine College, Victoria Improving Numeracy Outcomes: Findings from an intervention program Michaela Epstein - Chaffey Secondary College, Victoria Workshop: Developing Rubrics and Guttman Charts to Target All Students» Zones of Proximal Development Holly Bishop - Westgarth Primary School, Victoria Bree Bishop - Carwatha College P - 12, Victoria Raising the Bar: School Improvement in action Beth Gilligan, Selina Kinne, Andrew Pritchard, Kate Longey and Fred O'Leary - Dominic College, Tasmania Teacher Feedback: Creating a positive culture for reform Peta Ranieri - John Wollaston Anglican Community School, Western Aoutcomes in a multi-campus school Yvonne Reilly and Jodie Parsons - Sunshine College, Victoria Improving Numeracy Outcomes: Findings from an intervention program Michaela Epstein - Chaffey Secondary College, Victoria Workshop: Developing Rubrics and Guttman Charts to Target All Students» Zones of Proximal Development Holly Bishop - Westgarth Primary School, Victoria Bree Bishop - Carwatha College P - 12, Victoria Raising the Bar: School Improvement in action Beth Gilligan, Selina Kinne, Andrew Pritchard, Kate Longey and Fred O'Leary - Dominic College, Tasmania Teacher Feedback: Creating a positive culture for reform Peta Ranieri - John Wollaston Anglican Community School, Western AOutcomes: Findings from an intervention program Michaela Epstein - Chaffey Secondary College, Victoria Workshop: Developing Rubrics and Guttman Charts to Target All Students» Zones of Proximal Development Holly Bishop - Westgarth Primary School, Victoria Bree Bishop - Carwatha College P - 12, Victoria Raising the Bar: School Improvement in action Beth Gilligan, Selina Kinne, Andrew Pritchard, Kate Longey and Fred O'Leary - Dominic College, Tasmania Teacher Feedback: Creating a positive culture for reform Peta Ranieri - John Wollaston Anglican Community School, Western Australia
A secondary character outcome will measure children's writing self - efficacy.
Third, we considered access to healthcare as a secondary measure of how healthy each county is, given the impact this has on health outcomes.
Main Outcome Measures Primary outcomes were use of EC, pregnancies, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) assessed at 6 months; secondary outcomes were changes in contraceptive and condom use and sexual behavior.
Many studies also investigated the secondary outcome of women's satisfaction with their decision to hold or have other contact with the baby, typically measured through a study - specific, single Likert - scale item.
This gives an intrinsic motivation for behaviours driven by these psychological needs.40 Hence, support group sessions are designed towards creating a platform that promotes participants» sense of autonomy, competence and relatedness, while measures focusing on autonomy, competence and relatedness are utilised as secondary outcomes.
The principal outcome is depressive symptomatology measured with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the secondary outcome is quality of life.
A five - point reduction reflects a clinically relevant change in individuals receiving depression treatment.19 The secondary outcome was to determine whether the intervention also led to improvements in the patients» physiological measures.
Secondary outcomes include clinician's diagnostic confidence and routine clinical outcome measures.
Cognition measured by IQ at 3.5 years (Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence - IV32) and at 14 years (WISC - V31 or an equivalent adequate version at the time) are secondary outcomes, together with outcomes related to psychomotor development, behaviour and ADHD.
Secondary outcomes: psychotic symptom measures (PANSS); delusions (Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (PSYRATS)-RRB-; hallucinations (PSYRATS); depression (Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI - II)-RRB-; and social functioning (SOFAS score).
Batteries of biomarkers that measure allostatic load (also termed allostatic overload to highlight pathophysiology of the extreme)(38) tap into the major mediators of allostasis along with some key secondary outcomes, such as body mass index or waist — hip ratio and glycosylated hemoglobin (39), and provide a broad - based assessment of the dysregulation of these adaptive systems that has turned out to have predictive value in a variety of epidemiologic studies (40).
Intention to treat analysis reduced the effect size by 16 % on the primary outcome measure (antisocial behaviour) and by − 6 % to 36 % (mean 22 %) on the secondary measures.
Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) This study is a secondary analysis to determine the effects of Brief Strategic Family Therapy (BSFT) on parent substance use, and the relationship between parent substance use and adolescent substance use.
The current study measured outcomes on three levels of evaluation: changes in the family interaction process at the termination of treatment (tertiary prevention); recidivism rates 6 to 18 months following treatment (secondary prevention); and rate of sibling contact with the court 2.5 to 3.5 years following intervention (primary prevention).
This review will consider studies that include the following outcome measures: the primary outcome is preventing progression to psychosis (incidences of sub threshold psychosis and first - episode psychosis), the secondary outcomes such as symptoms of psychosis (both positive and negative symptoms), psychosocial functioning, depression, anxiety and quality of life.
Other secondary measures were used in the main outcome study but were not relevant for the present health economic analysis.
After adjusting for a broad range of confounder variables, the associations between parent - rated hyperactivity / inattention and conduct problems measured at age 3 and academic outcomes at age 16 (national General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) examination results) were investigated (n = 11640).
Secondary outcomes include measures of parent health, reflective functioning, relationship with the infant, and infant development.
In the present trial, a wide array of both parent and infant development measures are used, hopefully aiding future researchers to identify appropriate primary and secondary outcomes for trials on infants.
The addition of group treatment did not significantly further improve measured primary or secondary outcomes.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z