Those who are Buddhists will follow one set of laws,
secular humanists on, Utilitarians on, Unitarian Universalists one (with a lot of variation), etc. «Atheism» in itself says nothing at all about one's ethical beliefs.
Not exact matches
As
secular humanists we are typically «not» trying to enforce «laws»
on you «believers» that take away your equal rights under the conti - tution.
Evolution is
on the way out, and intense religionists (
secular humanists) such as Bill have no tenable hold
on the realities of our existence.
The
secular humanist public schools are always
on about persecution, hoping to entice kids into believing that if they leave their faith they will be part of the «majority» and therefore safer.
As a
secular humanist, we pride ourselves
on the idea that we are «good for nothing.»
In this regard, these traditions have more in common with each other than with
secular humanists who seek to justify human rights
on the basis of reason alone.
The usual assertions are (1) that this kind of religion is today
on the defensive; (2) that the defensive posture is occasioned by the flourishing of «conservative churches» (although the alleged liberal enervation is also seen in more autonomous terms); (3) that the growth in religious conservatism and conservative churches is itself the result of widespread reaction against «
secular humanist» values and against those who hold such values; (4) that our society as a whole has been experiencing a breakdown in moral consensus, a loss of moral coherence somehow connected with a decline in oldline Protestant dominance; and (5) that some or all of these happenings have been quite sudden, so that the early 1960s can be taken as a kind of benchmark — as a time before the fall.
Humanists and other
secular groups, many of whom are religious, are fighting back against this assault
on our educational and political system.
In 1995, roughly three dozen groups representing numerous faiths as well as a
secular humanist organization designed a joint statement
on religious liberties, showing support for what could be done legally in the schools, and disputing the claim that schools were «religion - free zones.»
Conservative Christians often blame this state of affairs
on a
secular humanist conspiracy, but the foregoing analysis suggests that such an explanation is simplistic.
What
secular humanists don't understand is even their world view of equal human rights are built
on New Testament principles.
A coalition of atheists and
secular humanists has placed a billboard
on Billy Graham Parkway in Charlotte that displays an American flag with a few key words from the Pledge of Allegiance: «One Nation Indivisible.»
«There is a serious defect in the amendment that has been presented to this House, because it would have the consequence - which I think is quite obvious when you look at it - that because of the discriminatory nature of the favour it gives to
humanists, as opposed to other
secular organisations, that it would have the consequence of making it incompatible with the [European] Convention [
on Human] rights,» he said.
Supporters of the campaign include the British
Humanist Association, Professor Ted Cantle and the iCoCo Foundation, the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, British Muslims for
Secular Democracy, the Campaign for State Education, the Centre for Studies
on Inclusive Education, the Christian think tank Ekklesia, the Hindu Academy, the Green Party, the Liberal Democrat Education Association, Liberal Youth, the Local Schools Network, Richmond Inclusive Schools Campaign, the Runnymede Trust, the Socialist Educational Association, and the General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches.
[37] The campaign has support from both religious and non-religious organizations at both the national and local level including the Accord Coalition, the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, the British
Humanist Association, British Muslims for
Secular Democracy, ICoCo Foundation, the Centre for Studies
on Inclusive Education, Ekklesia, the Hindu Academy, the Liberal Democrat Education Association, Richmond Inclusive Schools Campaign, the Runnymede Trust, the Socialist Educational Association, the General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches.
«More and more atheist,
humanist and
secular student societies are forming
on campuses across the UK and we deserve the same levels of respect as any other community.
Supporters of the campaign include the Accord Coalition, the British
Humanist Association, Professor Ted Cantle and the iCoCo Foundation, the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, British Muslims for
Secular Democracy, the Campaign for State Education, the Centre for Studies
on Inclusive Education, the Christian think tank Ekklesia, the Hindu Academy, the Green Party, the Liberal Democrat Education Association, Liberal Youth, the Local Schools Network, Richmond Inclusive Schools Campaign, the Runnymede Trust, the Socialist Educational Association, and the General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches.
The British
Humanist Association (BHA) is the national charity representing and supporting the non-religious, campaigning for an end to religious privilege and to discrimination based
on religion or belief and is the largest organisation in the UK working for a
secular society.
The Campaign launched in June 2013, and is also already being supported by the Accord Coalition, the British
Humanist Association, Professor Ted Cantle and the iCoCo Foundation, the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, British Muslims for
Secular Democracy, the Campaign for State Education, the Centre for Studies
on Inclusive Education, the Christian think tank Ekklesia, the Hindu Academy, the Green Party, the Liberal Democrat Education Association, Liberal Youth, the Local Schools Network, Richmond Inclusive Schools Campaign, the Runnymede Trust, the Socialist Educational Association, the General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches and a number of local campaign groups.
And the
secular humanist stuff is good (like the different versions of the «manifesto» Matt over-relied
on), but it isn't perfect, and it isn't fully developed or the «only» way.