Not exact matches
I
think something
secular where
people just want to do some good things in the world, apart from religion, is what I need.
I'm a very
secular person and I don't really subscribe to any religion, but I
think in doing this, she reveals herself as the stuck - up, conceited, and holier - than - thou
person she truly is.
But I do
think that black religious leaders have a responsibility, if they can not support gay marriage, to at least support and fight for the
secular rights of gay
people.
As a
secular - living and
thinking person, I found this article a worthwhile alternate perspective of the end - of - life process.
I somehow
think that «God's righetous and perfect judgement» for crimes would have a few
people upset and wanting to move over to the
secular side.
Secular humanism is my ideology and I make of it what I will according to my ideals of how I
think people should act towards each other.
Young
people whose pattern of
thinking is historical and
secular no longer find the traditional explanations of belief as formulated in the context of a static universe significant and meaningful.
Try following this again, it's not about education level it's about belief, the
secular argument is that
people of that age were not skeptical and that is just not true to
think otherwise is «chronological snobbery» > Just cause it's written doesn't mean it's true.
> Try following this again, it's not about education level it's about belief, the
secular argument is that
people of that age were not skeptical and that is just not true to
think otherwise is «chronological snobbery»
To name a couple only a fool would
think that god does not want his
people educated about
secular as well as spiritual things.
More positively, as fundamentalists have seen the nation become more
secular they have felt a responsibility to be «an exemplary, called - out
people,» pure in word, deed,
thought and appearance.
I believe we are our brothers and sisters keepers and one could make the argument that it falls under the category of rational self interest; however, the minute
people think they can enforce that philosophy at the end of a barrel of a gun (gov «t) the whole thing falls apart and religion becomes
secular humanism where the state replaces God.
«Most of my time I'm speaking to
secular people and I'm saying, «You know, you may
think religion is for idiots, but...» «I've switched 180 degrees from where I
thought religion was for children essentially —
people who had no education,
people who had this infantile relationship to the world and needed some sort of fi gurehead to help them,» he continues.
If America has gotten as
secular as
people claim it to be, not too many students go off to Spring and Winter breaks
thinking, EASTER!
It has severed the U.S. well with
people of different religions and
secular thoughts up until now.
For years I adopted, without bothering to
think, the attitude common among
secular, affluent, university - educated
people who took the propriety of abortion for granted, even when it was illegal.
According to Summit, a
person who
thinks evolution is a legitimate scientific theory, supports regulation of the free market, identifies with left - wing politics, and «seeks to empower the powerless, that is, women, minorities and homosexuals» is a postmodern
secular humanist with some Marxist tendencies.
Or
people who were raised in religions or
secular environments without god, or who find the concept illogical or who
think that «god» among the thousands of stories out there isn't even an interesting idea...
It is often
thought that change would open the door to control by crude and godless
people, perhaps by «
secular humanists,» perhaps by individuals influenced by some revolution abroad.
Yeah, right... he «unintentionally hurt»
people... he accidentally said parents should hit their kids if they
THINK they might be gay... sure, it was a typo... he couldn't actually have MEANT it... and it was
secular liberal media's fault... because all real «fair - minded»
people know what he meant... and that he didn't mean it... and someone else was to blame if he did... not that he did... but still he was the REAL victim...
I'd LOVE to know what the true numbers really look like... I
think it would shock a lot of
people... and maybe get a little more respect for
secular humanists...
While we do not
think the solutions to the three points raised in the ad are as simple as those proposed, we are encouraged that prominent evangelicals are joining the discussion, acknowledging that religious
people have something to say to
secular decision - makers.
The influence of Western technological culture has infiltrated the
thinking of educated
people throughout the world and the categories of
secular concepts are used to explain everything from repairing a bicycle to interpreting the scriptures.
The Marxist philosopher Ernst Bloch
thinks that the relative neglect of the problem of death in modern
secular thought is due to the unconscious influence of inherited Christian views: «Thus in its ability to suppress the anxiety of all earlier times, apparently this quite shallow courage [of modern
secular people] feasts on a borrowed credit card.
«I
think that language like «sky daddy» or «imaginary friend Sam» immediately and unnecessarily pits
people against each other... I don't want the
secular community to risk failing to engage with the faith community».
«I never
thought, as a first - generation American, whose parents and grandparents loved freedom and came here because they didn't want the government telling them what to believe and how to believe... that we'd have a president of the United States who would roll over that and impose his
secular values on the
people of this country.»
Actually, it was the leaders of the 19th century Indian Renaissance and the political thinkers in the ideological leadership of the 20th centary Indian Nationalism who grappled with the
person and teachings of Jesus Christ and assimilated the essence of Christian humanism into the religious and
secular thought of modern India.
In this way, conventionally religious and
secular persons alike may learn to
think less in terms of static states of interior, privatized subjectivity, and more in terms of processive - relational modes of doing.
The
person who wrote this article is obviously a «
secular humanist» sent by Satan to somehow confuse American Christians into
thinking it's okay to enjoy sex, or anything else for that matter.
People who truly know God have little use for
secular thought and political correctness.
We opted for a
secular education, where every
person is free to
think whatever they want and to choose what they see fit for their future.
The choice not to act, I realized after a college class on postmodern
thought, is itself an act, and like most
people I came to recognize the
secular version of the sin of omission and to understand that, sometimes, failing to act is just as blameworthy as acting badly.
Secular bear markets feature sudden, violent rallies and mini — bull markets that fool
people into
thinking they're the genuine article.
At the same time, he is genuinely interested in rituals, not just as historical ceremonies, but as ways of bringing
people and
thoughts together, just as he is sincere in his approach to incantation and religious music, testing even the most
secular members of his audience to reconsider their ambivalence about the «spiritual» in art.
There is no doubt some anti-Muslim animus in the Quebec bill, but I
think it's mainly a combination of a strong cultural preference to see
people's faces, along with a strong (if recently acquired) preference for
secular over religious statements.
But I
think that
secular people need to understand that it is perfectly possible to love a
person while at the same time recognizing that their behaviour is sinful.