I have recently written to the New South Wales Housing Minister and to housing ministers elsewhere in Australia to set out
the secure tenure requirements which will underpin our major COAG investment.
To a significant extent, reforms to state law are being driven by policies of the Australian Government, particularly
its secure tenure requirements under the Remote Indigenous Housing Agreement.
Not exact matches
Bank FDs of different
tenures are safe and
secure form of investment and also serve the purpose of meeting short - term liquidity or
requirement of funds in case of an emergency
The Minister has since written to each of the state ministers responsible for housing advising them of three key
requirements that determine whether
secure land
tenure has been settled:
As I set out above in 4.2 (b)(ii), the Australian Government has advised the states that there are three
requirements for
secure land
tenure.
I asked for further information about this, and was advised that these references are connected to the Australian Government's three
requirements for
secure tenure, which I describe in the next section.
[18] Those
requirements relate only to providing
secure tenure for governments, rather than implementing
tenure reform.
The Queensland Government has advised the Aurukun and Mornington Island Shire Councils and the native title holders for the land comprising those shire leases that it would like to amend the Local Government (Aboriginal Lands) Act 1978 (Cth) in order to comply with the Australian Government's funding
requirements and rules in relation to
secure tenure for housing and long - term leasing.