«Speaker Mark - Viverito has worked tirelessly
securing justice in the courts and prisons, uplifting the voice of young women and immigrant New Yorkers, and delivering crucial victories for vulnerable communities in the last four city budgets,» they said.
''... principal objects... are voluntarily to promote equality of rights and eradicate caste or race prejudice among the citizens of the United States; to advance the interest of colored citizens; to secure for them impartial suffrage, and to increase their opportunities for
securing justice in the courts, education for their children, employment according to their ability, and complete equality before the law.»
Not exact matches
More recently, Delrahim aided Trump's team
in securing Senate confirmation for Supreme
Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Since the Supreme
Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born
in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the
Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to
secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of
Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme
Court, believe
in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».
The plaintiff, however, is urging the
court to hold that Sections 293 and 294 of the Administration of Criminal
Justice Act (ACJA) of 201 which the EFCC relied on to
secure remand orders from a magistrate
court were inapplicable
in his case.
In response, however, the EFCC, in a counter affidavit deposed to by one of its prosecutors, Idris Mohammed, lamented that though it had earlier secured an interim order from Justice Mohammed Idris of the Federal High Court in Lagos to freeze Fayose's account, the governor, through Ozekhome, went before Justice Taiwo Taiwo of the Ado Ekiti Division of the Federal High Court to obtain an order to unfreeze the accoun
In response, however, the EFCC,
in a counter affidavit deposed to by one of its prosecutors, Idris Mohammed, lamented that though it had earlier secured an interim order from Justice Mohammed Idris of the Federal High Court in Lagos to freeze Fayose's account, the governor, through Ozekhome, went before Justice Taiwo Taiwo of the Ado Ekiti Division of the Federal High Court to obtain an order to unfreeze the accoun
in a counter affidavit deposed to by one of its prosecutors, Idris Mohammed, lamented that though it had earlier
secured an interim order from
Justice Mohammed Idris of the Federal High
Court in Lagos to freeze Fayose's account, the governor, through Ozekhome, went before Justice Taiwo Taiwo of the Ado Ekiti Division of the Federal High Court to obtain an order to unfreeze the accoun
in Lagos to freeze Fayose's account, the governor, through Ozekhome, went before
Justice Taiwo Taiwo of the Ado Ekiti Division of the Federal High
Court to obtain an order to unfreeze the account.
This could be extended as part of the wider changes to the EU's institutional structures that the Germans are keen to
secure in order to anchor the new eurozone arrangements firmly
in a rules based system — think European
Court of
Justice sanctions for breaking debt and deficit rules.
Justice secretary defies appeal
court ruling and permits staff
in «
secure college» to forcibly restrain teenage inmates
The EFCC said it was on this basis that it
secured an order of
Justice Muslim Hassan of the Federal High
Court in Lagos on December 29, 2016 to freeze the account.
In an important judgment given the ageing prison population, Louis Browne from Exchange Chambers has
secured an important judicial review success for the Ministry of
Justice at the Royal
Courts of
Justice.
Our familiarity with the local
court systems, judges, and our good rapport with all those involved
in the criminal
justice system are effective
in securing the best possible outcome for our clients.
In the recent months there has been a high level of media coverage on this topic following the European Court of Justice (ECJ) giving judgement in two cases relating to Muslim women whose employment was terminated because of their insistence on wearing headscarves in the workplace: Achbita and Anor v G4S Secure Solutions; and Bougnaoui and Anor v Micropol
In the recent months there has been a high level of media coverage on this topic following the European
Court of
Justice (ECJ) giving judgement
in two cases relating to Muslim women whose employment was terminated because of their insistence on wearing headscarves in the workplace: Achbita and Anor v G4S Secure Solutions; and Bougnaoui and Anor v Micropol
in two cases relating to Muslim women whose employment was terminated because of their insistence on wearing headscarves
in the workplace: Achbita and Anor v G4S Secure Solutions; and Bougnaoui and Anor v Micropol
in the workplace: Achbita and Anor v G4S
Secure Solutions; and Bougnaoui and Anor v Micropole.
In a letter to Haridopolos, State Supreme Court Chief Justice Peggy Quince said that she is still very interested in helping create the proposed commission, but wants to wait until the legislature secures fundin
In a letter to Haridopolos, State Supreme
Court Chief
Justice Peggy Quince said that she is still very interested
in helping create the proposed commission, but wants to wait until the legislature secures fundin
in helping create the proposed commission, but wants to wait until the legislature
secures funding.
The first stage of the process will... see the Online Solutions
Court expand our ability to
secure access to
justice in two ways... it will help individuals identify the nature of their problem.
For racial minorities and others who relied on the
courts to
secure full participation
in our democracy,
Justice Stevens will be missed.
In that decision, Supreme
Court Justice Pierre - Basile Mignault found that the section merely barred the levying of customs duties on goods moving between provinces, writing that «the object of section 121 was not to decree that all articles of the growth, produce or manufacture of any of the provinces should be admitted into the others, but merely to
secure that they should be admitted «free,» that is to say without any tax or duty imposed as a condition of their admission.
In the case of Achbita v G4S
Secure Solutions (CJEU C - 157 / 15) the
Court of
Justice of the European Union held that an internal rule of an undertaking which prohibits the visible wearing of any political, philosophical or religious sign does not constitute direct discrimination.
Adding, «These issues only serve to remind us that the challenge of
securing access to
justice can not be solved by locking coders
in a room for 24 hours with pizza and energy drinks, try as the
courts and judiciary might.»
As reported
in legalfutures, the Master of the Rolls, Sir Terence Etherton, said «[the online
court] should be seen as a template for
securing now and over time
in the future the critical object of greater access to
justice.
In a lecture, the Master of the Rolls, Sir Terence Etherton said that the «online solutions court should be seen as a template for securing now and over time in the future the critical object of greater access to justice.&raqu
In a lecture, the Master of the Rolls, Sir Terence Etherton said that the «online solutions
court should be seen as a template for
securing now and over time
in the future the critical object of greater access to justice.&raqu
in the future the critical object of greater access to
justice.»
This is also the sort of question that the
Justices would likely think ought to be decided by the Supreme
Court; it's one thing to have different views
in different circuits on some technical question, and another to have different views on whether an Amendment
in the Bill of Rights
secures an individual right or not.
The re-emergence of totalitarianism and racism
in Europe, Brexit
in England and the astonishing vitriolic attacks on the High
Court Justices who decided that Parliament needed to approve it, the erosion of membership
in the International Criminal
Court, the rejection of refugees, the threat to civil liberties
in Turkey, the re-emergence of the Russian bear, the destruction of Syria, the universal fear of ISIS and terrorism all cry out for a need for dialogue and collaboration to
secure the rule of law and respect for human rights.
The Pennsylvania Innocence Project has a four-fold mission to: (1)
secure the exoneration, release from imprisonment, and restoration to society of persons who are innocent and have been wrongly convicted; (2) provide clinical training and experience to students
in the fields of law, journalism, criminal
justice, and forensic science; (3) collaborate with law enforcement agencies and the
courts to address systemic causes of wrongful convictions; and (4) strengthen and improve the effectiveness of the criminal
justice system
in Pennsylvania through public education and advocacy.
Other «reasonable conditions... desirable to
secure the good conduct of the defendant» can be added to the recognizance, and under subsection (3.2), the
justice or summary conviction
court «shall consider whether it is desirable,
in the interests of the safety» of the defendant's spouse, common - law partner or child, to add to the recognizance either or both of these conditions:
Justice Ginsburg concluded
in her 20 page dissent: «The
Court's approbation of these consequences is totally at odds with the robust protection against workplace discrimination Congress intended Title VII to
secure.
Since 1 April 2013, a number of cases involving applications for LSPOs have been reported, most notably that of Rubin v Rubin [2014] EWHC 611 (Fam), [2014] All ER (D) 97 (Mar),
in which Mr
Justice Mostyn provided detailed guidance about the principles and procedure governing the exercise of the
court's powers to make LSPOs as well as making it clear that an order will only be made
in relation to costs already incurred when the
court is satisfied that, otherwise, the applicant will not be able to
secure legal services going forward.
(5) Subject to the order, the inspection shall take place under the immediate supervision of a local registrar of the Superior
Court of
Justice who shall be present during the inspection, and, so long as the ballots or other documents are
in the custody of the local registrar and not under inspection, they shall be kept
in a
secure place under lock and key.
In a recent Federal Court ruling, the Honourable Mr. Justice Hughes, himself a member of the aforementioned subcommittee, refused a request from the defendant (Her Majesty the Queen) to strike a Statement of Claim, and instead granted the plaintiffs (5 self - represented prisoners in a federal penitentiary) a 6 - month stay to, among other things, «secure competent legal counsel»
In a recent Federal
Court ruling, the Honourable Mr.
Justice Hughes, himself a member of the aforementioned subcommittee, refused a request from the defendant (Her Majesty the Queen) to strike a Statement of Claim, and instead granted the plaintiffs (5 self - represented prisoners
in a federal penitentiary) a 6 - month stay to, among other things, «secure competent legal counsel»
in a federal penitentiary) a 6 - month stay to, among other things, «
secure competent legal counsel».
[10] This
Court has no jurisdiction to suspend the precedential value of Grant Thornton Ltd. v. Alberta Energy Regulator and introduce another legal regime — the one
in place before Chief
Justice Wittmann released his judgment — for the governance of other bankrupts, receivers and trustees
in bankruptcy and
secured creditors for a period commencing with the date of pronouncement of any stay order and ending with the date the Supreme
Court of Canada either resolves an appeal against this
Court's judgment or dismisses the applicants» leave - to - appeal application.
Section 180 marks a sea change
in court fees because, contrary to established policy, it allows the Lord Chancellor to make a profit out of the fees charged for seeking the public
court to resolve a dispute, or again as some might put it,
securing access to
justice.
Highlights Monitor the progress of various clients and institute adjustments when necessary Effectively communicate with parolees, fellow parole officers and representatives of the
court Compile and analyze various
court reports Ensure full compliance with State regulations and standard operation procedures of the facility Apply strong problem solving skills
in different situations Assist parolees
in securing jobs and other necessary resources to transition into civilian life Strong public relations skills Proficient
in Microsoft Office Experience Probation Officer 1/1/2010 — Present Central Offender Services — Augusta, GA Manage the cases of several different parolees simultaneously Ensure that parolees have access to needed resources to make a successful transition out of the system Maintain an
in - depth understanding of the criminal
justice system and current and pending laws Hold periodic meetings with paroles to ensure that they are meeting all requirements for their parole Analyze various
court reports to determine appropriate courses of action with clients Receive and address parolee issues to help keep them on the right path
Washington, Los Angeles, Oakland About Blog
Justice in Aging is a national organization that uses the power of law to fight senior poverty by
securing access to affordable health care, economic security, and the
courts for older adults with limited resources.
Justice Dollinger summarized the issues before the
court as «[t] he mere suggestion that «exclusive use» should hinge,
in any fashion, on the «voluntary establishment of an alternative residence» also suggests that preventing domestic violence may depend,
in part, on the untenable notion that the convenience of one party's ability to
secure short - term housing away from the home is somehow more important than the emotional security of the children.»
«Mr
Justice Ryder's report however, does not address the increase
in relatives who, due to the legal aid reforms, will have to represent themselves
in court in order to
secure a residence or special guardianship order that could provide a child at risk with a safe, permanent home.