Representation of hedge fund general partner and investment manager in
securities fraud action brought by investor (D. Del.) and in SEC enforcement action brought under Securities Act § 8A, Exchange Act § 21C, Investment Advisers Act § 203 (e)--(f), and Investment Company Act § 9 (b)
Lead counsel for investor in a toy company sued in federal court in a class action
securities fraud action under Rule 10b - 5 for alleged insider trading
Defended bank
securities fraud action representing the bank and also coordinating the joint defense for all of the officers and directors who were sued on 10b - 5 grounds.
Obtained restitution in NASD
securities fraud action on behalf of internationally renowned actors.
Currently representing a director of a public company in a federal
securities fraud action pending in the Northern District of Illinois, arising out of the sale of an insurance company.
Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., with offices in Wilmington, Delaware, Garden City, New York, and San Francisco, California, has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars on behalf of investors and achieved substantial corporate governance reforms in numerous cases nationwide, including federal
securities fraud actions, shareholder class actions, and shareholder derivative actions.
We are currently advancing this approach on behalf of a multitude of foreign and domestic public and private pension funds, limited partnerships, and investment trusts in
securities fraud actions against BP plc relating to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010.
«With a proven track record in shareholder derivative suits and
securities fraud actions and an intimate knowledge of the appellate courts across Texas and the Texas Supreme Court, Andrew will be a strong asset to our firm and clients,» said Michael Forshey, managing partner of the Squire Patton Boggs Dallas office.
Olivia also advises organizations on civil
securities fraud actions and commercial disputes.
Mr. Lechtzin is a shareholder in the Securities Department and has extensive experience representing individual and institutional shareholders, including public pension funds, in federal
securities fraud actions.
Not exact matches
The Briscoe Law Firm, PLLC is a full service business litigation and shareholder rights advocacy firm with more than 20 years of experience in complex litigation matters, including claims of investor and stockholder
fraud, shareholder derivative suits, and
securities class
actions.
Collectively and individually, state
securities regulators enforce state
securities laws by investigating suspected investment
fraud, and, where warranted, pursuing enforcement
actions.
It will call on the departments of Labor, Justice, Homeland
Security and State to take
action to crack down on what the official called «
fraud and abuse» in the U.S. immigration system to protect American workers.
He represents clients in
securities cases, derivative
actions, consumer
fraud and complex commercial matters.
Tezos co-founders Arthur and Kathleen Breitman are reportedly hoping to use money raised in the company's token offering to pay their legal bills as they defend themselves against class -
action lawsuits alleging
fraud and the sale of unregistered
securities.
We may disclose personal information in special circumstances when we have reason to believe that disclosing this information is necessary to identify, contact or bring legal
action against someone who may be violating the Help Scout Terms of Service, to detect
fraud, or to protect the safety and / or
security of our users, the Help Scout website, or the general public.
The crackdown on PlexCoin represents the first decisive
action taken by the
security regulator's new cyber
fraud unit, but is part of a much wider agenda to regulate ICOs.
Mr. Gross came to Pomerantz in 1976 and, for nearly thirty years, has litigated
securities fraud and derivative
actions.
Former Managing Partner Marc Gross has over thirty years» experience litigating
securities fraud and derivative
actions, is a Vice President of the Institute of Law and Economic Policy, and frequently speaks at educational and legal forums on issues affecting shareholders.
Those cases include decisions addressing the jurisdiction of the SEC, the CFTC and bank regulators over newly created derivatives and other financial instruments; the scope of the definition of a «
security»; the availability of private damage
actions; extraterritorial application of U.S.
securities and futures laws; the standards of liability for
fraud and manipulation; electronic trading markets; and the scope of fiduciary obligations of brokerage firms and banks.
Further, if, for any reason, the Contest is not capable of running as planned by reason of infection by virus, bugs, worms, tampering, unauthorized intervention,
fraud, technical failures, or any other causes which, in the sole opinion of RDA, may corrupt or affect the administration,
security, fairness, integrity or proper conduct of this Contest, RDA reserves the right, at their sole discretion, to cancel, terminate, modify or suspend the Contest, and select the winners for the Contest, from the entries received prior to the
action taken or in other such manner as deemed fair and appropriate by RDA.
Currently, New York law blocks organizations or individuals from being able to sue banks for
securities fraud, and only allows legal
action against them to be taken by the State Attorney General's office, union officials said.
They cited three previous cases where courts ruled such questions are «relevant and probative» when they concern a defendant's
actions in the context of a
securities fraud prosecution, including that of pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli, whom Agnifilo represented.
Asked about the timing of the SEC
action during an interview Monday on CNBC, Spitzer, who prosecuted
securities fraud as the state's attorney general, said that «there's no question the SEC is desperate to prove that it can enforce the law, desperate to bring in the great white whale.»
Actions reasonably necessary to perform the Services may include (but are not limited to)(a) responding to support requests; (b) detecting, preventing, or otherwise addressing
fraud,
security, unlawful, or technical issues; and (c) enforcing these terms.»
7) A due - on - demand clause - The exceptions are if: a) There is material misrepresentation or
fraud by the borrower in connection with the loan; b) The borrower fails to meet the terms of repayment in the agreement; or c) There is any
action by the borrower that negatively affects the creditor's
security.
Levi & Korsinsky has expertise in prosecuting investor
securities litigation and extensive experience in
actions involving financial
fraud and represents investors throughout the nation, concentrating its practice in
securities and shareholder litigation.
Under no circumstances will the sites or the Chopra parties be liable to you for any loss or damages of any kind that are directly or indirectly related to the sites, the materials in the sites, the downloadable items, user content, your use or inability to use, or the performance of the sites, any
action taken in connection with an investigation by the sites or law enforcement authorities regarding your use of the sites, and
action taken in connection with copyright or other intellectual property owners, any errors or omission in the sites, technical operation, or any damage to any users computer, hardware, software, wireless devices, cellular phone, modem or other equipment or technology, including without limitation damage from any
security breach or from any virus, bugs, tampering,
fraud, scam, error, omission, interruption, defect, delay in operation or transmission, computer line or network failure or any other technical or other malfunction, even if foreseeable or even if the sites or Chopra parties have been advised of or should have known of the possibility of such damages, whether in an
action of contract, negligence, strict liability or tort.
You agree not to engage in any of the following prohibited activities: (i) copying, distributing, or disclosing any part of the Service in any medium, including without limitation by any automated or non-automated «scraping»; (ii) using any automated system, including without limitation «robots,» «spiders,» «offline readers,» etc., to access the Service in a manner that sends more request messages to the Company servers than a human can reasonably produce in the same period of time by using a conventional on - line web browser (except that Humble Bundle grants the operators of public search engines revocable permission to use spiders to copy materials from Humble Bundle for the sole purpose of and solely to the extent necessary for creating publicly available searchable indices of the materials, but not caches or archives of such materials); (iii) transmitting spam, chain letters, or other unsolicited email; (iv) attempting to interfere with, compromise the system integrity or
security or decipher any transmissions to or from the servers running the Service; (v) taking any
action that imposes, or may impose in our sole judgment an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on our infrastructure; (vi) uploading invalid data, viruses, worms, or other software agents through the Service; (vii) collecting or harvesting any personally identifiable information, including account names, from the Service; (viii) using the Service for any commercial solicitation purposes; (ix) impersonating another person or otherwise misrepresenting your affiliation with a person or entity, conducting
fraud, hiding or attempting to hide your identity; (x) interfering with the proper working of the Service; (xi) accessing any content on the Service through any technology or means other than those provided or authorized by the Service; (xii) bypassing the measures we may use to prevent or restrict access to the Service, including without limitation features that prevent or restrict use or copying of any content or enforce limitations on use of the Service or the content therein; (xiii) sell, assign, rent, lease, act as a service bureau, or grant rights in the Products, including, without limitation, through sublicense, to any other entity without the prior written consent of such Products» (defined below) licensors; (xiv) circumventing Service limitations on the number of Products you may purchase, including, without limitation, creating multiple accounts and purchasing a total number of Products through such multiple accounts which exceed the per - user limitations; or (xv) except as otherwise specifically set forth in a licensor's end user license agreement, as otherwise agreed upon by a licensor in writing or as otherwise allowed under applicable law, distributing, transmitting, copying (other than re-installing software or files previously purchased by you through the Service on computers, mobile or tablet devices owned by you, or creating backup copies of such software or files for your own personal use) or otherwise exploiting the Products (defined below) in any manner other than for your own private, non-commercial, personal use.
In February, three weeks after Exxon filed its legal
action in Texas, the Competitive Enterprise Institute filed a petition with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission urging the SEC to investigate the cities and counties suing Exxon for bond
fraud.
California Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris is investigating whether Exxon Mobil Corp. repeatedly lied to the public and its shareholders about the risk to its business from climate change — and whether such
actions could amount to
securities fraud and violations of environmental laws.
Ademi & O'Reilly is a leading
securities class
action law firm based in Wisconsin that represents classes of investors in
securities fraud, mergers & acquisitions, and shareholder derivative litigation.
We fight for the rights of those who are the victims of personal injury, wrongful death, slip and fall, dog and other animal bites, car accidents, tractor trailer accidents, pedestrian injuries, medical malpractice claims, drug claims, healthcare injuries, nursing home abuse and neglect, Workmen's Compensation, Social
Security disability, defective product / product liability, and consumer class
action causes / consumer
fraud.
Ed defends clients in litigation related to his white collar defense practice, including antitrust,
securities and consumer
fraud, class
action litigation, and litigation arising under the False Claims Act.
Lead counsel for a public healthcare company and its CEO in defense of a
securities fraud class
action and related shareholder derivative suit.
Laura has successfully argued a motion to dismiss a federal
securities fraud class
action, examined the expert witness and conducted the post-trial argument on evidentiary and valuation issues in an appraisal
action in Delaware Chancery Court, and obtained a favorable federal jury verdict after a multi-day prisoner civil rights trial.
Later, when I joined Schulte Roth & Zabel, I focused my practice on representing hedge funds, publicly listed companies, and private clients, as both subjects and victims in criminal and regulatory investigations on the state and federal level, and in a variety of state and federal litigation arising from commercial and investment disputes, including claims of
fraud,
securities class
actions, and derivative
actions.
We represent clients on both sides of the docket in
securities fraud class
actions, merger and acquisition (M&A) litigation and corporate governance litigation.
These agencies investigate and file civil regulatory
actions involving violations ranging from unregistered offerings to
securities fraud.
During his 21 - year legal career, Mr. Goldberg has litigated hundreds of cases in federal and state courts throughout the United States involving claims of retaliation, discrimination, wrongful termination,
fraud, defamation, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract, as well as commercial contract disputes, civil RICO, ERISA, trade secrets and restrictive covenants, corporate governance disputes, minority shareholder disputes, partnership disputes, Madoff counseling and defense, advancement and indemnification proceedings, whistleblower
actions (SOX and CEPA), executive compensation counseling, litigation, and arbitration, international litigation and arbitration, antitrust litigation and arbitration, products liability litigation, environmental and toxic tort litigation, and
securities fraud.
Operated by Stanford Law School, the
Securities Class Action Clearinghouse provides detailed and timely information about securities fraud litigation for use by the legal community, investors and
Securities Class
Action Clearinghouse provides detailed and timely information about
securities fraud litigation for use by the legal community, investors and
securities fraud litigation for use by the legal community, investors and the media.
Mr. Marx focuses on white collar criminal matters and regulatory enforcement
actions, and has considerable experience with investigations and prosecutions involving healthcare
fraud,
securities fraud, commercial bribery, accounting improprieties, research misconduct, export violations, antitrust violations and conflicts - of - interest.
He has experience in a variety of litigation matters, including
actions involving the fiduciary duties of directors, officers, and controlling stockholders, mergers and acquisitions litigation,
securities fraud litigation and other corporate governance disputes.
Securities fraud, for instance, can give rise to criminal liability and to civil liability in parallel private
actions.
Her experience includes both first - party and third - party insurance disputes involving claims for copyright infringement, misappropriation of likeness / right of publicity, trade disparagement, class
action securities fraud, Department of Justice and grand jury investigations, actuarial malpractice, class
action predatory lending, class
action right - of - way / trespass, class
action property and environmental damage, class
action toxic tort, personal injury / class
action mass tort, insurance broker - agent liability, and reinsurance.
As Lyle Denniston discussed in this analysis at SCOTUSBlog, the 5th Circuit threw out a class
action against various banks and brokerage firms for transactions related to Enron's defrauding of investors, finding that «the banks and brokerage firms had not engaged in a «deceptive act» under
securities fraud law.
We agree with the Attorney General that the purpose of the Martin Act is not impaired by private common - law
actions that have a legal basis independent of the statute because proceedings by the Attorney General and private
actions further the same goal — combating
fraud and deception in
securities transactions.
Mr. Moreno has acted as lead associate in complex
securities fraud class
actions under Section 10 (b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 and has defended derivative claims involving California, Nevada, and Delaware corporations.
Class
Actions: Robb is also Co-Chair of the Firm's Class Action Practice and has successfully defended, among others, several consumer fraud and securities class actions in some of the nation's most plaintiff - friendly jurisdi
Actions: Robb is also Co-Chair of the Firm's Class
Action Practice and has successfully defended, among others, several consumer
fraud and
securities class
actions in some of the nation's most plaintiff - friendly jurisdi
actions in some of the nation's most plaintiff - friendly jurisdictions.
Willie has prosecuted and defended claims involving breach of contract, tortious interference, state and federal antitrust, common law and statutory
fraud, misappropriation of trade secrets, negligent misrepresentation, business disparagement, state and federal
securities actions, product liability, nuisance, trespass, conversion, insurance coverage, corporate governance, breach of fiduciary duty, shareholder oppression, and qui tam.