It would be interesting to
see a graph like above but with lines added for the other major refined prodcuts.
Not exact matches
Looks
like most of my budget was well spent at 90 %, but I won't rest till I hit 98 %:) You can also
see some
graphs to determine which match types are converting the most leads.
You
see, there's an entire subfield of computer science that can roughly be described as «pulling information out of things that look exactly
like the Bitcoin transaction
graph», and while these researchers haven't done much to Bitcoin yet — that's only because they're still fighting over the grant money.
On the «Net
Likes» graph, you can see the number of new likes minus the number of unlikes on a day - to - day b
Likes»
graph, you can
see the number of new
likes minus the number of unlikes on a day - to - day b
likes minus the number of unlikes on a day - to - day basis.
Like pregnancy, combination hormonal birth control methods increase the risk of serious blood clots (
see graph below), especially in women who have other risk factors, such as smoking, obesity, or age greater than 35.
You can use tools
like Google Insights for Search to
see how a certain search phrase performs over time — you can
see when the search starts to increase for «halloween costumes,» for example, in the
graph below.
The tracker keeps me honest and I
like to
see the
graph of my weight and its gradual decline over time.»
What I would
like to
see is a
graph like breakdown of fees and wages for each of the 3 top teams we compete against.
I would
like to store a
graph I
saw in that paper, since it can support one of my arguments in my coming publication.
«With this tool we have reached the same conclusions as those presented in Nature by researchers working on the modENCODE, but the enormous difference is that instead of
seeing the information in hundreds of
graphs and figures
like in modENCODE, we have achieved a single map,» explains Azorín.
One way to weed corrupted data out of a high - dimensional data set is to take 2 - D cross sections of the
graph of the data and
see whether they look
like Gaussian distributions.
Like other temperature reconstructions done since 2001 (
see graph), it shows greater variability than the original hockey stick.
Trawl through Gold's back catalogue and you
see actors hopping from show to show on trajectories that look
like the GDP - growth
graph of a small developing country that has just discovered oil.
Guide students to
see past what
graphs look
like and understand what they represent using free online animations.
To
see what this looks
like in practice, check out the
graph below.
Treasure Hunt activity (
like match cards but round the classroom -
see instructions) on estimating from scatter
graphs using the line of best fit.
Topics covered in this bundle (click on each title to
see the original product listing): Order of Operations Algebraic Expressions Vocabulary Writing Algebraic Expressions Reading Algebraic Expressions Evaluating Algebraic Expressions Equivalent Expressions Combining
Like Terms The Distributive Property Writing Equations Checking Solutions Solving Equations with Addition and Subtraction Solving Equations with Multiplication and Division Writing Inequalities
Graphing Inequalities Solving Inequalities with Addition and Subtraction Solving Inequalities with Multiplication and Division Equations in 2 Variables
«They
graph the amount of times they
see the animal or how much snowfall was out there or what the temperature was
like,» she says.
CHARTS AND
GRAPHS ARE NOT ENOUGH: Activist Deray McKesson generated 1,700 retweets and
likes with his comment that «It's exhausting to
see so many reporters write about education with no proximity to actual school systems, or classrooms.
I also
like the charts and
graphs that you can quickly create in GradeCam to
see what students are learning.
Students particularly
like the feature because their answers are displayed on a
graph, and they can
see how other students have answered.
I do
like the turbocharged V8 though expected a bit more torque and consequent lower rpm horsepower (though of course I didn't
see the torque / horsepower
graph).
2) I'd
like to
see a second set of the
graphs with the outliers in.
I would really
like to
see this
graph all the way back to 2010.
He mentioned that he'd
like to
see a basic
graph showing how these numbers compare.
You might sell a few hundred books or whatever over a weekend and then it could be the next Wednesday, Thursday, Friday before the page reads start to kick in and you
see then the
graph start to go up and up and up and you're
like, «Oh, where's this coming from?»
They have been spending billions of dollars on initiatives
like Facebook Home and
Graph Search to
see them not really amount to much in the near term.
If you would
like to
see all of the pretty
graphs with detailed explanations you can go ahead and skip this summary.
For the past three years or so we,
like everyone else, have watched the overall sales
graphs slide down, and it's been kind of shocking to
see that there's no end to the slide.
But let's face it: Disney
likes money too, so we're sure they would have gotten on board once they
saw the
graphs.
As I
see, it was in 2000 too,
like Loutre and Berger (I don't know that paper, as it is not online), but I remained content with making a
graph with a short educational text, so that I could use it when lecturing about climate change.
Would it make sense to put yearly temperatures on the
graph as well to
see how the projections are doing
like the BBC did?
i can «
see» (i'm visual...) how on both
graphs about half the blue lines (temp) fall above and below the pink line (linear fit and filtered error)--
like that pink line WOULD represent a good «averaging out» or «noise reduction» in the data.
I thought it was interesting how uneven the deep ocean warming appears to be, almost the opposite of what we
see in the
graphs like the one above.
I think the
graph I would
like to
see is if we told the model that produced that
graph the forcings from 2005 — 2012 and let it calculate the temperatures and then compare those temperatures with the actual ones measured.
Since this
graph was prepared, anthropogenic emissions and the atmospheric CO2 content have increased further,
see Figs 4 and 5, but I
like the simplicity of this
graph.
Look at the
graph in my post on what an «energy moon shot» would look
like to
see the effort and investment that went into the Apollo program and the war on cancer.
hengav (00:25:44): What I became alarmed at were
graphs like: http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/GEOMAG/image/aastar07.jpg There are three factors that contribute to the trends
seen in the Figures you cite: (1) the aa - index is too low before 1957,
see http://www.leif.org/research/Analysis%20of%20K=0%20and%201%20for%20aa%20and%20NGK.pdf (2) the sunspot number is too low before 1946,
see http://www.leif.org/research/De%20maculis%20in%20Sole%20observatis.pdf (3) the Earth's dipole magnetic field has decreased 10 % the last 150 years.
But looking at the big picture shown in the
graph I posted, I
see quite few time periods where there were five or ten years of flat or declining temperatures (including several during the satellite era) very much
like what we're
seeing today.
Since Russia is a pretty fair chunk of the land north of 30 degrees north, the CRU
graph above is a rough approximation of the what the CRUTEM3 trends for Russia is, and you can
see that it looks
like the blue curve and not the red one.
As you can
see in the
graphs, some people
like their apartment a bit hotter and use more energy.
it doesn't need to involve my
SAW or AHH's AGW) that doesn't admit an obvious decomposition resembling Figure 10 of my poster, and instead has a component more
like D'Aleo and Easterbrook's
graph at WUWT that was mentioned here earlier, this ought to be excellent grist for their mill, as well as hopefully satisfying those objecting that
SAW has nothing whatsoever to do with ocean oscillations.
Looking forward to
seeing what his
graph here looks
like when redone to take land use changes into account.
I would
like to
see a
graph with larger error bars (0.1 or even 0.02 degrees) along with the data and the trend lines to get a better feel for it.
For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we
see goats
like political charlatans
like Al Gore showing debunked
graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.
I
like this
graph where you can
see the development of the 15 - year linear trend along the 50 - year linear trend (not centered, the last 15 and 50 years, HADCRUT3).
Like the rhythm of retreating and advancing glaciers, rates of sea level rise have ebbed and flowed as
seen in this
graph from the IPCC.
But (if I
see the situation clearly) a private citizen
like Keenan does have a right to request the lab analysis of those cores — and probably Baillie's (or the lab tech's)
graphs of those results.
Seeing as how you
like to manufacture woodfortrees
graphs to suit your argument...
But in articles
like «Scant Gains Made on CO2 Emissions, Energy Agency Says» by Sarah Kent in the Wall Street Journal on April 18, 2013, we
see a
graph with a 6 C temperature rise by 2050 — if we don't reduce «carbon intensity.»