Sentences with phrase «see a graph like»

It would be interesting to see a graph like above but with lines added for the other major refined prodcuts.

Not exact matches

Looks like most of my budget was well spent at 90 %, but I won't rest till I hit 98 %:) You can also see some graphs to determine which match types are converting the most leads.
You see, there's an entire subfield of computer science that can roughly be described as «pulling information out of things that look exactly like the Bitcoin transaction graph», and while these researchers haven't done much to Bitcoin yet — that's only because they're still fighting over the grant money.
On the «Net Likes» graph, you can see the number of new likes minus the number of unlikes on a day - to - day bLikes» graph, you can see the number of new likes minus the number of unlikes on a day - to - day blikes minus the number of unlikes on a day - to - day basis.
Like pregnancy, combination hormonal birth control methods increase the risk of serious blood clots (see graph below), especially in women who have other risk factors, such as smoking, obesity, or age greater than 35.
You can use tools like Google Insights for Search to see how a certain search phrase performs over time — you can see when the search starts to increase for «halloween costumes,» for example, in the graph below.
The tracker keeps me honest and I like to see the graph of my weight and its gradual decline over time.»
What I would like to see is a graph like breakdown of fees and wages for each of the 3 top teams we compete against.
I would like to store a graph I saw in that paper, since it can support one of my arguments in my coming publication.
«With this tool we have reached the same conclusions as those presented in Nature by researchers working on the modENCODE, but the enormous difference is that instead of seeing the information in hundreds of graphs and figures like in modENCODE, we have achieved a single map,» explains Azorín.
One way to weed corrupted data out of a high - dimensional data set is to take 2 - D cross sections of the graph of the data and see whether they look like Gaussian distributions.
Like other temperature reconstructions done since 2001 (see graph), it shows greater variability than the original hockey stick.
Trawl through Gold's back catalogue and you see actors hopping from show to show on trajectories that look like the GDP - growth graph of a small developing country that has just discovered oil.
Guide students to see past what graphs look like and understand what they represent using free online animations.
To see what this looks like in practice, check out the graph below.
Treasure Hunt activity (like match cards but round the classroom - see instructions) on estimating from scatter graphs using the line of best fit.
Topics covered in this bundle (click on each title to see the original product listing): Order of Operations Algebraic Expressions Vocabulary Writing Algebraic Expressions Reading Algebraic Expressions Evaluating Algebraic Expressions Equivalent Expressions Combining Like Terms The Distributive Property Writing Equations Checking Solutions Solving Equations with Addition and Subtraction Solving Equations with Multiplication and Division Writing Inequalities Graphing Inequalities Solving Inequalities with Addition and Subtraction Solving Inequalities with Multiplication and Division Equations in 2 Variables
«They graph the amount of times they see the animal or how much snowfall was out there or what the temperature was like,» she says.
CHARTS AND GRAPHS ARE NOT ENOUGH: Activist Deray McKesson generated 1,700 retweets and likes with his comment that «It's exhausting to see so many reporters write about education with no proximity to actual school systems, or classrooms.
I also like the charts and graphs that you can quickly create in GradeCam to see what students are learning.
Students particularly like the feature because their answers are displayed on a graph, and they can see how other students have answered.
I do like the turbocharged V8 though expected a bit more torque and consequent lower rpm horsepower (though of course I didn't see the torque / horsepower graph).
2) I'd like to see a second set of the graphs with the outliers in.
I would really like to see this graph all the way back to 2010.
He mentioned that he'd like to see a basic graph showing how these numbers compare.
You might sell a few hundred books or whatever over a weekend and then it could be the next Wednesday, Thursday, Friday before the page reads start to kick in and you see then the graph start to go up and up and up and you're like, «Oh, where's this coming from?»
They have been spending billions of dollars on initiatives like Facebook Home and Graph Search to see them not really amount to much in the near term.
If you would like to see all of the pretty graphs with detailed explanations you can go ahead and skip this summary.
For the past three years or so we, like everyone else, have watched the overall sales graphs slide down, and it's been kind of shocking to see that there's no end to the slide.
But let's face it: Disney likes money too, so we're sure they would have gotten on board once they saw the graphs.
As I see, it was in 2000 too, like Loutre and Berger (I don't know that paper, as it is not online), but I remained content with making a graph with a short educational text, so that I could use it when lecturing about climate change.
Would it make sense to put yearly temperatures on the graph as well to see how the projections are doing like the BBC did?
i can «see» (i'm visual...) how on both graphs about half the blue lines (temp) fall above and below the pink line (linear fit and filtered error)-- like that pink line WOULD represent a good «averaging out» or «noise reduction» in the data.
I thought it was interesting how uneven the deep ocean warming appears to be, almost the opposite of what we see in the graphs like the one above.
I think the graph I would like to see is if we told the model that produced that graph the forcings from 2005 — 2012 and let it calculate the temperatures and then compare those temperatures with the actual ones measured.
Since this graph was prepared, anthropogenic emissions and the atmospheric CO2 content have increased further, see Figs 4 and 5, but I like the simplicity of this graph.
Look at the graph in my post on what an «energy moon shot» would look like to see the effort and investment that went into the Apollo program and the war on cancer.
hengav (00:25:44): What I became alarmed at were graphs like: http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/GEOMAG/image/aastar07.jpg There are three factors that contribute to the trends seen in the Figures you cite: (1) the aa - index is too low before 1957, see http://www.leif.org/research/Analysis%20of%20K=0%20and%201%20for%20aa%20and%20NGK.pdf (2) the sunspot number is too low before 1946, see http://www.leif.org/research/De%20maculis%20in%20Sole%20observatis.pdf (3) the Earth's dipole magnetic field has decreased 10 % the last 150 years.
But looking at the big picture shown in the graph I posted, I see quite few time periods where there were five or ten years of flat or declining temperatures (including several during the satellite era) very much like what we're seeing today.
Since Russia is a pretty fair chunk of the land north of 30 degrees north, the CRU graph above is a rough approximation of the what the CRUTEM3 trends for Russia is, and you can see that it looks like the blue curve and not the red one.
As you can see in the graphs, some people like their apartment a bit hotter and use more energy.
it doesn't need to involve my SAW or AHH's AGW) that doesn't admit an obvious decomposition resembling Figure 10 of my poster, and instead has a component more like D'Aleo and Easterbrook's graph at WUWT that was mentioned here earlier, this ought to be excellent grist for their mill, as well as hopefully satisfying those objecting that SAW has nothing whatsoever to do with ocean oscillations.
Looking forward to seeing what his graph here looks like when redone to take land use changes into account.
I would like to see a graph with larger error bars (0.1 or even 0.02 degrees) along with the data and the trend lines to get a better feel for it.
For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.
I like this graph where you can see the development of the 15 - year linear trend along the 50 - year linear trend (not centered, the last 15 and 50 years, HADCRUT3).
Like the rhythm of retreating and advancing glaciers, rates of sea level rise have ebbed and flowed as seen in this graph from the IPCC.
But (if I see the situation clearly) a private citizen like Keenan does have a right to request the lab analysis of those cores — and probably Baillie's (or the lab tech's) graphs of those results.
Seeing as how you like to manufacture woodfortrees graphs to suit your argument...
But in articles like «Scant Gains Made on CO2 Emissions, Energy Agency Says» by Sarah Kent in the Wall Street Journal on April 18, 2013, we see a graph with a 6 C temperature rise by 2050 — if we don't reduce «carbon intensity.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z