Sentences with phrase «see a judge rule»

Not exact matches

Circuit Court Judge Pamela Campbell has ruled that only the jury may see it, and not others in the courtroom or watching online.

Meanwhile, the banking industry is, not surprisingly, dismayed by the judge's ruling, saying that large and small banks will see their revenues squeezed.

(Revelations 19)(when jesus comes back to earth) «And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war», «His eyes were as a flame of fire», clothed in a vesture dipped in blood ``, and «out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.»»

An immigration judge can not quiz asylum seekers on religious doctrine to see if they are credible about their faith, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reiterated in a January ruling.

As you may have seen, last week, Reformed leaders Mark Dever, Ligon Duncan, Al Mohler, Don Carson, Kevin DeYoung, and Justin Taylor reaffirmed their support of C.J. Mahaney, president of Sovereign Grace Ministries, after a judge ruled that that nine of the eleven plaintiffs in the massive sexual abuse lawsuit against him and his ministry did not sue in time before the statue of limitations had expired.

Besides, in a rhetoric ruled by a logic, testimony even conceived as a relation of transpired facts, occupies necessarily an inferior place, for it shows the dependence of the judgment and of the judge with regard to something exterior: on the first level, the things spoken by another, and on the second, things seen by him.

In one ruling the judge saying the kids may see the commandments and start following them.

2 things we can learn for example is if you see a fight one way but the judges ruled it differently go back and watch the fight over and over and try to see it how the judges might have seen it.

Maybe he isn't the genius some would have us believe but judging by the emphasis he puts on cup competitions (the FA Cup for us, the Europa League last season), don't rule out the appearance of something not seen at Everton for over 20 years — a trophy.

It was also not a good night for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and his supporters, some of whom complained bitterly about being unable to vote for their preferred candidate due to the state's closed primary system, (though the rules have been as they are for some time, and not at all a secret), and saw a last - minute legal challenge in hopes of opening up the Democratic primary rejected by a judge.

(Rarely have I seen so sympathetic a statement from a judge in favor of the person he was ruling against).

On Monday, a judge in Prince William County in Virginia ruled that the American Tradition Institute did not have a right to see the e-mails under the state's freedom of information laws.

Next, I show you similar nonsense words you have not seen before, and you have to judge whether you think each test word obeys the same unknown rules as do the training words you have just seen.

Based on the «2000 AD» comic, Alex Garland's script sees Judge Dredd (Karl Urban), totally committed yet unsympathetic law enforcer in a future dystopia, going up against a gang leader who rules from the top of a 200 storey tower block.

Republicans generally took a wait - and - see approach to the ruling, but hinted at a major battle with the courts if judges tried to order the increase directly.

The unions suffered an embarrassing defeat when the plaintiffs won at trial — but the judge's ruling was heavy on political rhetoric and light on legal reasoning (see «Script Doctors,» legal beat, fall 2014).

And Deasy himself sees the judge's ruling as ammunition in his fight to implement Academic Growth over Time.

A lawsuit challenging the country's largest private school choice program saw a significant setback today, as a Leon County circuit judge ruled the groups behind the case did not have standing to bring the lawsuit.

A judge has ruled that the state is ultimately responsible for seeing that school districts provide services to all English language learners not receiving the help they need to become proficient in English.

See articles released about this ruling this morning in the Santa Fe New Mexican («Judge suspends penalties linked to state's teacher eval system») and the Albuquerque Journal («Judge curbs PED teacher evaluations).»

One of the reasons that the AMBR contestants can have such active backstories is that unlike the Detroit - based Ridler award, which requires that the entrants be never before seen brand - new builds, AMBR rules only specify that the car has not been in a judged competition.

While consumers and industry watchers alike have spent a fair amount of time waiting eagerly to see how the ruling handed down against Apple for anti-trust violations would actually impact the publishing industry, the tech company has made a statement of its own asserting that the decision by Judge Denise Cote in the case brought against them by the Department of Justice is overly punitive and harsh.

The filing, made to the US District Court in the Southern District of New York on October 3rd, sees Apple appealing not only the ruling but Judge Denise Cote's proposed injunctions, which included long - lasting restrictions on how it could negotiate media deals as well as forced monitoring by an external watchdog.

, some of you may see how a judge may not give a damn what Chase says about arbitration requirements or their right according to the agreement to change it at any time however they want, fundamentally Chase is using legalise to avoid accountability for fraud, and the ruling shall therefore be, for the interests of justice to be properly served, that these contractual provisions shall set aside for the purposes of determining the charges.

For example if one were to edit out all finance stocks since some CAPE Ratio scholars (See Jeremy Siegel) have indicated that it is unfair to judge stocks utilizing ten years of data when the mark - to - market rules changed within the finance industry.

Judge: Merchants can steer you to lower - cost card — Merchants should be allowed to offer consumers discounts or perks to use a lower - cost credit card, a federal court ruled... (See American Express anitrust ruling)

Judge: Merchants can steer you to lower - cost card — Merchants should be allowed to offer consumers discounts or perks to use a lower - cost credit card, a federal court ruled... (See American Express anitrust ruling)

Bad guys obey most of the cliché stealth game rules, but judging when they can and can not see you is easy, and thus it's satisfying to slink through an entire base either avoiding, killing or incapacitating everything that moves.

The court did not see it that way, and Judge Richard A. Jones has now ruled that RecogniCorp's complaint was invalid.

For certain arbitrators, this means, users will be able to see their analytics as a judge, their rulings as a judge and their decisions as an arbitrator.

District Judge Chris Lethem — a member of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee and Judicial College trainer on costs — told us that he hardly ever saw applications to vary budgets.

Users will now be able to see not only how judges tend to rule on certain types of motions, but they will also be able to see the actual rulings.

Rather, judges are to look to the modern rule (the language, the various elements of context, the intention, and purpose) to see which particular interpretation conforms to the schematic policy behind the legislation.

It is noteworthy that the Crown first argued that the defence should not even be able to ask the Court's permission to call the witness (see para. 20 of the trial Judge's Ruling).

The exception to this rule is undue hardship, which takes on a Potter Stewart quality in bankruptcy proceedings: It's not clearly defined, but a judge knows it when she sees it.

But, with the Rita ruling released last week, I think Judge Posner et al. should have taken a little extra time to see if Rita ought to impact its dicta and dictates (even if not its unreasonableness conclusion) in Goldberg.

Such relaxation of the application of the rules of evidence also can be seen in jury trials, including where the judge allows prosecution witnesses to testify to otherwise inadmissible hearsay matters after a prosecutor claims s / he will «tie up» the hearsay loose ends with subsequent testimony and evidence.

At the blog Massachusetts Liberal, where the judge's order is seen as the outcome of a «shoot the messenger» mentality, the key word is «abomination»: «Hopkins ruled that one news outlet could not report the kind of news we don't like to hear — that even heroes are mortal human beings.

Otherwise, any national technical regulation or specification which «may create obstacles to the free movement of goods within the internal market», as referred to by Directive (EU) 2015/1535 (see Article 6), might be referred to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling by a national judge, contrary to the current case - law already referred to above delimitating the scope of Article 267 TFEU to EU provisions and excluding national ones.

I've seen attorneys go on tirades on Twitter because they disagreed with a judge's ruling and I've seen attorneys disparage their clients in blog posts, referring to them as «unsophisticated» or «difficult.»

On March 24, Business Court Judge James L. Gale issued his ruling (see below), denying LegalZoom's motion and partially granting the bar's motion.

Although the creation of rules will not in itself change the widespread concerns of SRLs, it will send an important message to the collective legal community, including judges who often see SRLs as nuisances.

I published the whole FRAND passage of Judge Posner's ruling, and while Judge Posner makes reference to eBay in his overall denial of injunctive relief in the Apple v. Motorola case, you can read the original text in that blog post and you'll see that Judge Posner's position on FRAND is entirely independent from the four eBay factors: it's a general competition / antitrust and common sense kind of argument.

Though I won't credit all my whining about the need for the Supreme Court to start addressing all the important issues left unresolved by Blakely and Booker (see, e.g., here and here), I will celebrate the big news coming from Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog that the Court today granted cert in «a significant sequel to its series of rulings on the roles of judges and juries in criminal sentencing» by accepting for review «the issue of whether a violation of the jury's role in sentencing can ever be excused as «harmless error.»»

And today, Microsoft filed a request for judicial notice of the FRAND part of Judge Posner's Apple v. Motorola decision, which I said before is the best FRAND ruling I've ever seen.

Speculative risks of conflict are not enough to remove defence counsel, a Superior Court judge has ruled in a case the Crown argued could see the accused's lawyer cross-examining another client of his.

Absent a specific rule, interactions with judges are always governed by the standard of «appearance of impropriety» — that nebulous standard that reminds me of Justice Stewart's pornography quote («I know it when I see it»).

It seems that the CJEU would view third country law as an issue of fact to be proved (see in this regard the article by Judge Rodin in the current issue of the American Journal of Comparative Law), which would seem to rule out the possibility for it to order «measures of inquiry» (such as the commissioning of an expert's report concerning third country law) under Article 64 (2) of its Rules of Procedure in a reference for preliminary ruling for the interpretation of Union law.

Via How Appealing I see that on Wednesday, a three - judge panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that if a urine sample collection company wants to have a rule that its collectors shall directly observe the urine coming straight out of a man's body, with visibility of that man's genitalia, well, that is just fine with the 6th Circuit.

Bryson J.A. determined that, in this context (single Judge sitting in chambers), the powers of the Court of Appeal are procedural and interlocutory (See Rules 90.37 & 90.40).