Sentences with phrase «see a proof for»

I admit that I scanned the docu - ment pretty quickly, so I may have missed it, but I did not see a proof for god — please guide me to the relevent sections.»

I am an athiest now, but not because I was angry at the church or any reason like that, I just saw no proof for, or need for a god.

But what if I told you that HIIT has never been proven to be 9 times more effective than regular cardio... What if I told you that the same study actually shows that HIIT is 5 times less effective than steady state cardio??? Read on and see the proof for yourself.

Check out Verizon's performance results page to see the proof for yourself.

Not exact matches

Patrick Mylund Nielsen, the lead blockchain engineer at JPMorgan, believes Zcash's zero knowledge proof — based technology holds more promise for privacy than any other single approach he's seen.

This coupled with a proof of principal prototype was enough for investors to connect the dots and see what was possible.

Too many of the also - rans are already stuck in the proof - point pudding (moving sideways instead of forward) and finding that they can no longer sell the same old «just wait and see» story as easily to the guys that totally fell for it the last time.

These companies hope to see an expanded H - 1B visa program, the creation of visas for immigrants who show proof of VC backing, and a clearer path to citizenship for high - skilled workers who are here illegally.

«The fact that we have seen over # 1 billion worth of venture capital investment into London fintech companies since the EU referendum vote offers further proof that global investors still believe London will remain a leading fintech hub for many years to come,» Rajesh Agrawal, London's deputy mayor for business, said in a statement Thursday.

In a photo recently posted to Instagram, Floyd Mayweather, the boxer, sits on a private jet surrounded by stacks of dollar bills, touting the sale of tokens for a prediction market called Stox — a moment some saw as proof that ICO hype had reached peak zaniness.

There's also the positive spin: others in financial markets see it as proof that past stimulus measures have done their job in avoiding a «hard landing» for the economy.

Though she did not make it through to the second round, her score was widely seen as a win for her party and as proof that the National Front had become part of the French political landscape.

The most successful founders I see wait to raise — they wait to demonstrate traction and hit proof - points that represent real step - change for their companies — and when they do, they ask for a lower range.

For example, the visa currently states membership in selective professional associations as proof of exceptional work; Ohanian would like to see admittance into startup funds such as YCombinator or 500 Startups included in that requirement.

See page 14 for a description of acceptable forms of proof of Share ownership.

I really don't understand now (I am far less naive) how people would sign up for a seminar without actually seeing documented proof that the mentor / teacher is doing deals.

Matt asks:»... What I'd like to see from you and the other prophets of social media publish are the top 10 things I can do immediately that will help me spread the gospel of home ownership and drive brand preference to CENTURY 21...» Interestingly, my response quickly reached the first page of the Google results for the phrase «Century 21 Real Estate» a company with 8,000 offices worldwide, proof that new marketing works.

Many of the miners on Ethereum saw that going back to the old system may be more lucrative for them than the proof of stake system.

It's still viewed as one of the go - to places for cloud computing information (proofs: two major cloud events are requesting for promotional collaborations for their 2015 events — the deal has been finalized) but it has seen better days, and hopefully it will return to its glory soon!

They should be seen as proof of the rewards for long - term investing, says.

1) See if some billionaire wants to sleep with your wife for a million dollars 2) Give the casino a security interest in your house, and hope you don't have to show proof of income to get the loan 3) Try to get the casino to give you back the money you lost.

With its depression - proof business, I see three big risks for American Water Works: tough regulators, operational headaches, and higher interest rates.

The real bone of contention for educated folk is the «miraculous» events, for which there obviously can be no proof other than being tehre to see them.

There is ample evidence for the existence of God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that God exists, but proof for me may not be proof for you, some people can see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both for and against the existence of God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...

you can't have absolute science that demands a logical and tangible cause (which no one has the right answer for because no one lived millions of years ago) and then also believe that God exists though you have never seen proof of His existence.

Tom tom: I'm sure you accept many things without absolute proof - for example, you probably accept that matter is made of atoms which you can not see; you probably accept that gravity is not going to disappear tomorrow; you probably believe that testing a theory over and over will yield reliable results.

For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truFor me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that trufor how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that trufor now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.

Okay... hmmmm... I've seen enough to have proof for my own beliefs... how's that.

But given that there isn't proof for it and it claims to be able to violate the natural laws of the universe (which I also have never seen happen) allows me to reach the conclusion that there probably isn't a God.

(103) «Now have come to you from your Lord, proofs (to open your eyes): if any will see, it, will be for (the good of) his own soul; if any will be blind it will be to his own (harm): I am not (here) to watch over your doings.»

If there was any proof to even prop up intelligent design as a legitamite scientific theory, then it would be out there for the public to see.

There will always be someone trying to prove the Bible is not true, but for those of us who have seen the work of God, who truly believe in him, it doesn't really matter what science says, or what they can «prove» to be false about God or the Bible, what God has done in my life and keeps on doing is proof enough to know He exists.

For many, the contingent proof of a Grand Maker is by what they can see.

What religion offers: — The opportunity to avoid eternal punishment for not worshiping / believing in my god (not worried enough to care)-- An explanation for the universe and why we are here (I'll take the knowledge gained from the application of the scientific method, but thanks)-- Living forever in heavenly bliss (I am content with this life)-- The opportunity to divide humanity based upon different belief systems (There is enough dividing us already)-- Purpose, a code of ethics, and fulfillment (I have that already, without religion)-- Develop a personal relationship with god (I've never seen or heard from any gods nor have I seen any independantly verified scientifically collected peer reviewed proof.

what is very interesting to me tonite is the folks who are positive there is no god... what is equally interesting is the snarling that appears whenever one does not «toe» the atheist line of no god... It has been said over and over here, «there is no proof of your God» ad nauseum I might add... OK... please, I am asking you in the nicest possible way... explain to me, without a Designed, where the universe and all it entails, first got its source... I really would like to know... from everything I see, I see beauty, design, tragedy, poetry, poverty, etc.... How did we begin to name or classify any of this... what intelligence gave us our intelligence... I have yet to see an anwer posited as to how it all came about, absent a Designer... I will wait for an answer... How did it ALL get here, and explain the precision and engineering of it all — right down to the last jot of DNA.

When Ezra cries, «Thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve,» (Daniel 9:16) or a prayer in the Book of Nehemiah says, «Thou art just in all that is come upon us; for thou hast dealt truly, but we have done wickedly,» (Nehemiah 9:33) or Daniel exhausts tautology in confessing, «We have sinned, and have dealt perversely, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled,» (Daniel 9:5) we see the self - accusation which resulted from the acceptance of national misfortune not as an evidence of Yahweh's weakness in protecting his people but as proof of his inflexible righteousness.

Nobody saw the evengelists writing their accounts of the bible — It is impossible to prove who wrote it 2000 years after the fact — But what we do have is faith, for this no proof is needed.

I do hear your points that you think I have not seen the need for warning of danger, that you believe I think of it as «unChristian» to talk about such things, and that you may even believe that my comments are akin to protecting evil deeds and harming the innocent, using the bible as a proof texting weapon to that end and contributing to a problem of church becoming fake and shallow while claiming to be deep and pious.

To be deep in history is certainly, for instance, to cease to be an evangelical of the kind who allows experience to trump doctrine, who believes doctrine can be read off the surface of the biblical text, and who sees no theological or existential problem that can not be solved with a proof text or two.

See that's faith what you just described, because it happened before your time you want more proof for your eyes... He Einstein didn't really have any proof now science is confirming him so maybe after death you get the proof... Live life joyously without regrets you may get no other.

@JT — See my @hahaha for my intended use of the word «proof».

I have yet to see a shred of proof for evolution.

You say she has no proof that she has seen angels but do you have proof that she has not see angels and if you have proof that she has not I would love for you to point it out and we believe GOD is real for we walk by faith and not by sight but you say no one has proof that GOD existed but think about this what would lose believing in GOD if he doesn't exist?

Note that the proof was recently demonstrated, see for example this link: http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/scientists-use-computer-to-mathematically-prove-goedel-god-theorem-a-928668.html

Ok you have as much FAITH in your proof as she does that see has seen angels so there for you are believing in something you have not seen right you have not seen here medical records to prove that she has Schizophrenia.

So its ok for him to prove his points (which btw science can not prove something to be real when it comes to THEORIES which is what evolution is, which i believe to be true), yet when someone wants to believe in something that they see points to proof in thats not ok?

seriously, I want to see that, because if it's true, then I will immediately unsubscribe to his blog and tell everyone I know to also do that, but if not, then you should delete this post, because you are making claims for which you have no proof

u guys are just proof of the devil's relentless ways of deceiving the world, one day u will see that this life was a feeble one compared to the one that some fortunate indivuduals will be able to spend in paradise, while others unfortunately will perish forever, most people do nt like to think that when they die they are going to be held accountable for how they carried out their life, which is unfortunate, because there are goona be a lot of people who are gonna be uncomfortably hot for the rest of eternity

Seeing as atheists are constantly calling for proof, it doesn't make sense to say that atheists have faith.

This is just proof the church should have handle the problem better, than maybe some of you could have seen this man for the man he was instead of his biggest failure.