Sentences with phrase «see a return on your investment if»

However, you'll only see a return on your investment if you choose to do a conservative remodel that doesn't break the bank.

Not exact matches

If you're using it as a family, Amazon Household is one of the easiest ways to see the return on your Prime membership investment.

If your company has no strategy for growth, you are saying to investors that their money may be going to a good cause, but they are not going to see a return on their investment.

While you don't need to be able to do everything required in the job, it helps if the company can see an immediate return on their hiring investment.

If so, a whole lot of entrepreneurs might be putting in a ton of work only to see very little return on their investment of time as their various efforts cancel each other out.

If you could add one more column to your chart that listed «amount invested», then we (I) could see the sort of return you're getting on each passive investment.

If you are paying 8 % on your student loans and are worried that you will only see 7 % annualized returns on your investments, paying down your student loans as fast as possible makes sense.

The good news is, if you become proficient with these tools, you should see a positive return on your ad investment.

So, if there's any concern, Facebook isn't seeing it, and thinks there's still room to improve return on investment to support higher ad prices.

The most critical period for offsite SEO development is your first few months — you'll see the lowest returns on your investment, but you have to keep going if you want to scale.

If we were to get a 4 % return on our investments and continue to work until our retirement month, we can expect to see 106 % in our four buckets (see table from earlier).

If you are ready to once and for all see a real return on your investment in social media and digital marketing you need to look deeper than the follows, clicks and retweets.

However, if you offer online classes three days a week for $ 10 a day, then you will need to reach a much larger audience and develop a reasonable following in order to see the return on your investment.

For most startup investments, investors must wait for at least 4 - 7 years before a liquidity event (if any) before they see a return on their investment.

Yes the «standard» balancing the books stuff is monotonous but I'd wager a hefty amount if it was your money / investment you wouldn't be so gung - ho on the spending front — especially if you could see a decent return at low risk with the current business model.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

As you can see, if you bet every Over since 2004 you would have barely cracked a profit (0.1 % return on investment).

... i believe the kind of investment that arsenal puts on the team is not proportional to the profit thats gained by the club and thats why you will hear year in year out how our returns eclipsed all the other teams but when it comes to investing in the team that brings these profits, its the other way round... what is the use of having money just laying in the bank idle while we can make better use of it by investing well on it???... i honestly don't believe that we will lift another major trophy with mr arsene as our manager... i just don't see it and if you disagree then care to tell me how

March 21 — If Tottenham Hotspur were to sell Harry Kane they would see a return on investment of $ 198 million, making him the biggest and best potential piece of player business in the world.

If you want to see a measurable return on the training investment, you can't afford to waste time with obsolete training methods that don't impact behavior.

Otherwise, how will you know if you've seen a Return On Investment (ROI)?

«If we can't see a return on that investment, we'll see how best to support educational attainment going forward.»

If I develop a diesel system for our country and I spend a huge amount of money to do that, I won't see a return on the investment.

The suggested price tags for those services can be daunting, especially if you're not a marketing pro who is certain he'll see a return on the investment.

Without a clear correlation between ads and sales, it can be hard to shell out cash when you don't know if you'll see a return on your investment.

If you've gotten feedback and done serious work on these elements, you're likely to see a return on your investment in the form of sales and good word of mouth.

It's a widely - held belief that developer participation in a mobile ecosystem is what ultimately makes or breaks it (which is why Microsoft has been incentivizing developers on Windows Phone in a variety of ways), but this takes it to a new level: developers don't want to spend the time to port their apps or write new ones if they won't see a return on investment, and a guaranteed payout of $ 10,000 is an interesting attempt to alleviate those concerns.

Certainly, Blofeld is right that at this point many if not most of those self - publishing may not be seeing a return on their investments.

I can not speak for Canadian procedure, but I know that in the US depending on how the «return / gain» is classified will sometimes trigger taxation as it is considered exceptional gain but even then usually you can offset it by your «investment expenses» and normally comes to a wash, meaning it has to be reported TECHNICALLY as a gain but it is often offset elsewhere in the code, have you checked to see if that «taxation» was also offset by any «credit» elsewhere?

Diamonds are often considered an investment of sorts, but you won't see a huge return on your money the way you would if you were buying a home or a piece of property.

Yet if the dollar appreciates and the foreign currency declines, an investor could see his return on investment eroded.

Review your mortgage statement to see how much of your loan you have left to payoff, then evaluate targeting this as a goal before you retire (the «return» on your money is essentially equal to your interest rate — you'll lose the tax deduction for the interest, but if you invested the same amount you'd owe taxes on the investment return).

If Biotechnology Value Fund is able to cause the company to quickly distribute the company's remaining cash to stockholders, purchasers at these levels should see a good return on investment.

If you invest in the stock market, you might not actually see a return on your investment for several years.

Depending on your percentage of ownership, you may discuss with the management of these investments any items that are generating AMT on your tax return to see if the AMT impact can be lessened in future years.

With renting, what you see is what you get, and there's no return on investment if you leave.

If you'd invested in 400 shares of Coca - Cola in 1984 (the same year Warren Buffett invested in it), you would have seen a 12.8 % return on your investment on just price and stock splits, not including any dividend reinvestment.

Even if the property value stayed stable with no appreciation, you would still see a positive return on your investment.

The most - common usage is to see if the fund of money will last until some assumed age (usually life expectancy), given an assumed rate of return on investment accounts.

If you have an advertising budget and are willing to learn to tackle FB's ad platform, you can see a significant return on investment.

Even if Trump himself were gone tomorrow, the nation still faces simmering crises (falling energy return on investment, increasing economic inequality, over-reliance on debt, climate change) that appear to be leading toward collapse of government and the economy; meanwhile, as a result of political polarization, social fragmentation, plain old corruption (see NRA), and truth decay we are losing whatever ability we ever had to address those crises.

If you keep your ideal clients in mind as you write your posts and select your ad targeting, you'll see a significant return on your investment.

You just need to figure out how it works, do it right, and then see if the return on investment is going to pay off in the end.

In the Canadian context, my view is that few, if any, large firms use these competitive advantages to their full potential; the work required to properly take advantage is seen as a «cost» to the firm with no immediate return on investment.

I plan to measure the statistics on views of the video to see if there is a diminishing rate of return on my 2 hour investment of creating it.

Because if they think you have a good idea and that your business may be profitable, they're expecting to see a return on their investment.

If you engage her, you will surely see a return on your investment!

«It's extremely difficult to time the market, but if you're a longtime homeowner in one of these cities, you could potentially see a great return on your investment,» Gudell says.

Or would you see a better return on your investment if you purchased a ready - made system that boasts a source of leads and a robust communication system?

If you are willing to put in the work, you will see the return on your investment.