Not exact matches
But within the context of people saying they are SBNR, I don't really
see such people reacting
against a loosely defined definition of
religion as merely moral teachings administered with certain rituals and structures.
Amos 8:4 - 7 describes God pressing a serious charge
against his people for oppressing the poor and
seeing religion as an annoying «new moon» inconvenience.
NikNak you rile
against those believing in
religion, but i
see you have a lot of hate your self
against religious people.
Therefore, I
see any argument
against God /
religion involving people or evil to be invalid, unnecessary or irrelevant.
I am not
against religions or your GOD, but If you use your mind a bit, you will
see, that: 1.
I hope the Muslim world
sees this for what it really is, one individuals attempt to hate on another
religion and just calm down
against innocent people who had ZERO involvement with this.
I don't
see Christians calling for violent jihad
against a political group or another
religion.
As you can
see I'm dead
against this
religion.
but, when I
see all these extremist bombing all over the world & EXPRESS HATE to American the land WE live in, do we not have a responsibility show up and fight
against them — fight for our country USA has nothing to do with Islam — wrong is wrong no matter what
religion...
Finally good to
see slow but steady progress
against the total lunacy that is
religion, we need more money guys on our side making awareness possible.
We seem to be going through a period of aversion
against religion or theology that seems to influence or change society or the world, and from my desk I can
see no sign that the tide will be turning.»
The usual assertions are (1) that this kind of
religion is today on the defensive; (2) that the defensive posture is occasioned by the flourishing of «conservative churches» (although the alleged liberal enervation is also
seen in more autonomous terms); (3) that the growth in religious conservatism and conservative churches is itself the result of widespread reaction
against «secular humanist» values and
against those who hold such values; (4) that our society as a whole has been experiencing a breakdown in moral consensus, a loss of moral coherence somehow connected with a decline in oldline Protestant dominance; and (5) that some or all of these happenings have been quite sudden, so that the early 1960s can be taken as a kind of benchmark — as a time before the fall.
Once again we
see the curious way in which the two
religion clauses, intended to be mutually supportive, are played
against each other.
The real opposition for Buber is not between philosophy and
religion, as it at first appears to be, but between that philosophy which
sees the absolute in universals and hence removes reality into the systematic and the abstract and that which means the bond of the absolute with the particular and hence points man back to the reality of the lived concrete — to the immediacy of real meeting with the beings over
against one.
The real conflict for Buber is not between philosophy and
religion, but between that philosophy which
sees the absolute in universals and hence removes reality into the systematic and the abstract and that which means the bond of the absolute with the particular and hence points man back to the reality of the lived concrete — to the immediacy of real meeting with the beings over
against one.
When the social gospel was at the height its greatest exponent in America, Walter Rauschenbusch, despite his animadversions
against traditional
religion,
saw clearly how much the human problem would remain the same in the best of all possible worlds.
Folklore and
religion, therefore, emphasized the «spirit of the soil» as
against the scientific view that
saw soil as dead matter.158 It is this close relationship between humankind and the earth that led L. H. Bailey to remark,
You know, please rest your conscience here as you read I am not an authority AT ALL as youll come to
see, My lord has pulled me out of church the holy spirit filled church where I recieved Christ, and told me to visit ALL churches, oh and by the way 6 years ago The Lord asked me to open an out reach food pantry and safe haven for the needy, in the city that we live in, anyway this journey was humbling, God always shows me I am the stinker, that its my flesh that wars
against the spirit, So many people are worried about satan, and demons or bad freinds or family or other
religions, Yeah it makes you wonder 1st is it the same bible Im reading Jesus said it is finished!
results of what islam is capable of has been
seen everywhere in the world... results can be
seen all over the world... Muslims have declared war
against almost every other
religion..
He added that he does not condone personal attacks
against someone of another
religion but «if you're merely criticising a
religion or proclaiming your own
religion, I don't
see how the law can get involved».
They do not in any way represent the Sikhs and if you look further you will
see they have there own Gurdwara's and follow their own, militant sub-set of the Sikh
religion, which if you read our holy book is totally and completely wrong and immoral and goes
against everything a Sikh stands for.
These people would not allow any
religion but Christianity to be
seen in a good light if taught in classes in the USA, when history proves that, Christianity is the reason so many people in the USA have been motivated to lynch black people, make gays second class citizens, fought
against woman being allowed to vote, hunted down and killed others from different denominations, force all other's to pay for their «work» whether in the USA or around the world through tax exempt status, gifts or «Faith - based initiatives».
However, she was also ADAMANTLY
against religion, as she
saw it as illogical and a potent way for the weak to control the strong.
There are always pessimistic and optimistic views over Islam but my
religion teaches peace and humanity and jihad is to resist
against wrong no matter if some one have same faith, it can be through writing also and please if u haven't read my
religion, (which I can
see) then please DO N'T comment.
(i) the question of gay rights — funny I agree with gay rights, must be a political debate at its heart (ii) a wonan's right to choose — funny I agree with this,
see above thought (iii) teaching evolution in school — again I agree (iv) my ability to buy a glass of wine on Sunday — definitely politics here (v) immunizing teens
against HPV — got my kids immunized, not even politics here (vi) population control — this is
religions fault??? no this is cultural (vii) assisted suicide at end of life — agree with that, still have my
religion (viii) global warmning — agree it needs to get fixed, doesn't have anything to do with
religion
lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument
against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't
see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.
In the previous episode, we really only
saw that Moses was in fact writing a polemic
against the gods of these other
religions and cultures.
We need to
see these things because many of us have been so steeped in
religion that we have a natural defence
against seeing who we really are (ie.
And the worst part is that the church is neglecting believers (like Christian Latinos and the persecuted church) and those are the people we are commanded biblically to care for — «Feed MY sheep» — not people who have, OVER and OVER AGAIN
seen the goodness of Christianity and have still rejected Christ in favor of a
religion that has declared Jihad
against the very people who are helping them.
In summary, the virtues of organized
religions include but are by no means limited to the following: they give their adherents something solid
against which to rebel; they allow one to
see farther by standing on the shoulders of giants; they insist on the primacy of lived experience; they work
against illusion and historical insularity; they point to the power of the collective and the merits of deep diversity; and they are capable of the kind of mobilization that can transform the world.
Deep down, the distrust of Americans
against collective agreements and government enforcement can be
seen as correct reactions of
religion that
sees its own role diminished if government / state is too successful.
lets
see this guy really take a stand
against religion.
I have never advocated violence
against any believer — I have stated that I hope to
see the end of
religion in my lifetime.
The battle waged
against polytheistic practices by the Mosaic and Christian
religions must be
seen as a total emotional response which penetrates our attitudes more deeply than any intellectual affirmations.
Freud
saw and reacted
against the old arrogance of
religion.
Do you
see a REALITY of what happens to thos nations that turn
against religion?
I am not
against religion - I have
seen the comfort that many people have gotten from their faiths.
Nor do I
see any awareness among American Jews of the irony inherent in religiously identifiable groups arguing
against the place of
religion in public life.
It's happening everywhere: on the right
against open borders and the refugee wave, on the left
against the coalition bombing campaign in Syria, in the establishment to push for more online surveillance, in the libertarian right to push for fewer gun controls, among atheists who
see religion as the cause of all evil.
It would be nice to
see laws like those
against anti-Semitism extended to include all
religions so that Islamophobia or anti-Muslim hatred was also a crime in our country.
If you haven't
seen the string of Chemistry.com TV commercials that are geared
against eHarmony and how they just reject peoples personal ads because of
religion, sexuality or their system just can't match the person up with anyone.
Compare its intelligence and earnestness, its infernal energy,
against the disrespectfulness and self - satisfaction of The Cabin in the Woods to
see that Evil Dead is not just a taste of the old
religion, it's really pretty great.
Christian Europe
saw anti-heretic, anti-witch and anti-science oppressions and Jihad wars
against «Infidels» motivated by the
religion.
[xliii] In a stinging dissent, Judge Andrew Kleinfeld observed, «Discriminating
against religious schools in a program of otherwise general availability makes no sense as a strategy for avoiding an establishment of
religion, because treating everyone the same without regard to
religion is hard to
see as «establishing» anything — except equality.»
No employees, former employees, or applicants for employment can be discriminated
against due to their protected class such as: race, color, national origin, sex, (gender, pregnancy, sexual harassment, sexual orientation, gender identity or transgender status),
religion, age (40 and over), disability (mental / physical), equal pay compensation, genetic information and retaliation (
see the NO FEAR ACT).
For some Muslims, Western secular culture and the conspicuous consumption that often goes along with it are
seen as undermining their faith; others acknowledge the democratic systems of the West but struggle to balance that appreciation
against a
religion that they feel leaves little room for liberal values.
See, what it's really about is various atheists and liberals high up in authority, or who have used climate change as a dramatic part of their bizarre
religion of everything
against traditional
religion, except perhaps Buddhism, since it's atheistic, it's their future Noah's Flood prophecy, part of their evolving mythos.
«I chose the lecture's title [«One
religion is enough»] largely in reaction to the sanctimonious tone employed by so many of those who advocate quite substantial, and costly, responses to what they
see as irrefutable evidence that the world's climate faces catastrophe,
against people who do share their view.