Sentences with phrase «see another view here»

Not exact matches

It is certainly possible that Musk could see a «deal» to be made here: Trump supports a carbon tax in exchange for Musk dumping his views on global warming.

Here are some of Vanguard's views on the broader global economy and the «rising risks to the status quo» that it sees.

I showed here the rear views of the Roadster II, and she immediately said that was what she had seen.

If you don't see a Table of Contents to the left, click here to view that series, where you'll get more value than reading just this post.]

If you don't see a Table of Contents to the left, click here to view the series, where you'll get more value than reading just this post.]

Last week we published the first Social Media Marketing World conference eBook and while it's had over 15,000 views on Slideshare and many thousands of views here already, I think we've just seen the tip of the iceberg.

By the way, if you want to see this trade exactly as it appeared in our newsletter, press here to view our free swing trading archives.

For additional insight into our longer term view, please click here to see a piece provided by our research consultant, Asset Consulting Group, that takes a brief look at the year - end review.

And since some 40 % of scripture regarding alcohol has a positive view on drinking it, then i don't see a problem here (as opposed to the 10 % that is against drinking and the 50 % that is neutral).

There is also a huge difference in tone between the hate used by some people and what Nated Pastor is doing here, I don't see it in anyway as making him or commentors look as bad as the patriarchy views.

Mr. Blake, I'm impressed to see you enter the fray here, to try to address the inability of Christian apolgists here who are apparently unable to read and / or comprehend the written word because doing so upsets their world view.

so glad YOU know what god means... why don't you enlighten the rest of us becuase the bible is full of contradictions... I am going to come here everyday now to see if you can fill me in... but unless you can clear it up for me post haste, I am going to continue to view belief in god as silly and childish which it is and that is how I teach it... I don't say «all of you listen: god doesn't exist.»

But here's what you should consider: if we can understand what it means to have our world - view changed even briefly by believing in a movie long enough to get creeped - out by the zombies in it, we have to see what Peter was saying to the Jews — because he wasn't asking them to suspend their disbelief: he was telling them things they had witnessed for themselves.

That view is more ou + rageou $ than anyth!ng else I see here, and the «$ atanists» would not have $ ugge $ ted this, had y0u pe0ple not started this g@rb @ge.

I never appreciated his use of gratuitous nude pictures he used earlier on to increase his numbers... but I saw it for what it was... I can also see why my husband and I'm sure others, would be offended by what they see & read here if this is not their view of church & religion.

If you think there are some «compelling reasons» to change your views, then why wouldn't you share them here, and others can see them and either change as well or possibly present «compelling» reasons from the other side?

Here, we see that failure - avoidance is rooted in the desire to protect our self - image and our view of ourselves as «winners» so that we won't have to deal with the difficult feelings of disappointment or rejection.

Now, I'm sure some might play with semantics here, and I don't know ancient Greek, but I find it hard to see how this view is «listening to the Prophets.»

As we approach next week, here's a quote that is worth noting and following - see if you agree, and if you don't it'll maybe shake your view of the author...

I haven't really seen where Neal thinks the nation should run off his own views but there are some reading challenged commentors on here that don't seem to get that.

This would be a comfortable way out of the impasse if we could think so, for in view of the fact that the end of the world has not yet come, it is not easy to fit into the rest of his words such sayings as, «Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death before they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom» (Matt.

I can not discuss them all here, but the following references are a start: Theodore de Laguna, review of The Principles of Natural Knowledge in Philosophical Review, 29 (1920), 269; Bertrand Russell, review of Science and the Modern World in Nation and Athenaeum, 39 (May 29,1926), 207; Charles Hartshorne, Creativity in American Philosophy (New York: Paragon House, 1984), 5,32,279 - 280; and even though Stephen Pepper believes both Whitehead and Bergson are mistaken in their views, he believes they are extremely similar: see Pepper, Concept and Quality: A World Hypothesis (LaSalle: Open Court, 1967), 340 - 341.

It should not be surprising then that Whitehead thought of God as a single actual entity immune to the possibility of loss.59 At least William Christian sees this as the proper Whiteheadian view.60 Nevertheless, Christian's position is challenged by Ivor Leclerc, who argues, in agreement with Hartshorne, that Christian's conclusion is incompatible with the categoreal scheme elaborated in chapter two of Process and Reality.61 Here, according to Leclerc, Whitehead «makes clear» that the category of «subjective perishing» is «necessarily applicable to every actual entity whatever, including God.»

«I prefer this over christological or christocentric since these are susceptible to a point of view I am not advocating here, namely, needing to «see Christ»; in every, or nearly every, Old Testament passage.

Here the subjectivist principle is seen to be inextricably connected to those «categories from another point of view.»

For his views on this see especially the discussion of the paper published here, «God as Composer - Director, Enjoyer, and, in a Sense, Player of the Cosmic Drama.»

Again, here I see, while committing sin is viewed as possible but not inevitable, forgiveness is pictured as inevitable on the condition of repentance from sin.

@honestanon Just a quick one here but if you do a bit of research you will see many clashes at Gurdwaras around the World and a great number of them are from good, honest hard - working Sikhs who see that a few individuals with an extremist viewpoint try to make their way in to our Gurdwaras, gain trust and then later show their true colors by trying to implement their extremist views.

Here we see unknown writers in the hills of ancient Judah, seated in simple homes that from the point of view of our present - day luxury might be regarded as little better than hovels, surrounded with furnishings more bare and austere than those of a medieval monastery, equipped with simple reed pens and rolls of papyrus, or perhaps with broken sherds of old pots, as they slowly indite in awkward, ancient Hebrew characters, words that have run like fire and are potent at this distant day.

His view is that Paul basically gave himself free reign here at the start of his teachings to the gentiles (see also 1:1 a: «Paulos, apostolos ouk ap anthroopoon, oude di anthroopon, alla dia Iesou Christou, kia Theou patros...») and then started preaching his own theology heavily influenced by his own biases and preferences — not that any of the writers were ever completely exempt from it of course, but still the writer felt Paul was quite fundamentalistic at times about certain things he had some clear opinions about, e.g. about relationships and women's position in the church etc, which he then propagated as part of the gospel.

Yep you are right, I moved down here in the state of Mississippi, north of Crystal Springs from Chicago when I was ten years old but still I visit once in a while, now it's twenty years and sad to not much has change, like the parts you said about non-whites discrimatory or rasicts at other non-whites, when I went to school here they treated me as a alien from another galaxy, they pick at my voice cause I didn't had that southern dialog, unlike them I said my words correctly, but not just me, they even hated at others who had better intelect I am not picking at them, It is what I went through all these years, Mississippi and mainly this small town of Crystal Springs see America in a crazy awful view, They don't like difference that even within they own race, ther not that politcal, when some one say God they got there vote, I don't to say much to waste your time, I still remember when I was ten years old I had a constanct back ground check on me to see were I really come from evn though I had the paper saying Chicago Illinois barely no jobs but a church on every street for a town barely under five Thousand, till this very day, they look at me like I am a alien, did you ever had that experiance down here damn my keybroad mess up,

I here and now ask again why, why have we never seen an atheistic view point in the body of government we call our own?

The only intolerence I see here is on the part of the gay rights groups who insist on forcing their views on everyone else.

Here again it is not because we prefer this view; it is because, so far as we can understand ourselves and what human existence is like, we see it to be true.

I think it is cool to still be a «Christian», of course (well, only certain types)-- hell, I don't identify as an Atheist — it is an epiphenom for me (see this post) and I too am viewed differently by many — see my picture I drew here.

I posted the link here so that you can view the front page and see the images of kids holding the world's deadliest snakes in the shopping malls image to get an idea of what I mean.

Here St. Augustine's realistic view of political life is of such character that Reinhold Niebuhr can call him the wisest political philosopher in Christian history.24 What St. Augustine does is to see the way of love in history as requiring the adjustment of life to political necessities.

Look at all the scared, hate - filled Christian wan na be's... Jesus was a liberal and loves all... it's only the simple - minded humans who live in fear, hate and ignorance... you Christian sinners wouldn't know what to do with yourselves if you didn't have something, or someone, to hate... you are pathetic... it was your family before you who wanted to see blacks remain slaves an invoked their perverted views of the bible to justify their hate... and now you, their offspring, are here to repeat their stupid mistakes... ignorant losers are those who hate and mock someone different... Live and let live...

In a few thousand years of recorded history, we went from dwelling in caves and mud huts and tee - pees, not understanding the natural world around us, or the broader universe, to being able to travel through space, using reason to ferret out the hidden secrets of how the world works, from physics to chemistry to biology, we worked out the tools and rules underpinning it all, mathematics, and now we can see objects that are almost impossibly small, the very tiniest building blocks of matter, (or at least we can examine them, even if you can't «see» them because you're using something other than your eyes and photons to view them) to the very farthest objects, the planets circling other, distant stars, that are in their own way, too small to see from here, like the atoms and parts of atoms themselves, detected indirectly, but indisputably THERE.

It may not be out of order here to make some comparisons as to the effectiveness in this field of three dominant types of American church life the Roman Catholic, the fundamentalist Protestant, and the liberal — mainly with a view to seeing what can be learned from types other than our own.

Whitehead is not asserting an epistemological solipsism here, but is stating that the question of the community of nature to all, being metaphysical, is not one that has to be answered from the point of view of science.3 Moreover, it remains to be seen whether or not Whitehead's position, as it unfolds in the Enquiry, will remain uninvolved in the «difficult metaphysical question.»

Come now, highest feast on the road to eternal freedom, Death, lay down the burdensome chains and walls of our temporal body and our blinded soul, that we may finally view what we have been unable to see here.

For a view of Deuteronomy differing in some important respects from that taken here, see also his Theologie des Alten Testaments, Munich, 1957, vol.

His views about women are very well known so it is hardly surprising to see him read them into the Esther story as he has clearly done here.

Chef Jason of the Vegan Culinary Experience was kind enough to share his basic dairy - free pesto recipe with us here (see below), but once you have it down, take a look at the VCE February issue (which is free to view and download) for his Power Pesto, Sun - Dried Tomato Pesto, and Walnut Pesto recipe variations, oh yes, and the Pizza with Pesto and Tofu Ricotta too.

Everyone is entitled there view and they can speak what they see is wrong be it 1000 times.if u do nt like what they saying say what u see fit not cme here and bash them in an article that talks about not to give up season is still a baby.

The AP Poll featured here is a decent barometer for how the committee might see things, but shouldn't be viewed as a perfect predictor.

We were handing out copies of our Annual Review, if you haven't seen it view a digital version online here.

Anyone commenting here has their view of the football program limited to game time, small chunks of practice we might see in athletic dept approved media (i.e., the pulse), and limited info from the pressers.

I don't think anyone here has a personal issue with OG, so I don't see how his exploits at the Euro will change our views on him.