Not exact matches
Many of them
ask for permissions to
see what is happening on your mobile device, and then sell the
data.
Ask stakeholders to review the
data;
see if they think they'll be able to act based on what they
see.
Jason argues companies should be required to
ask users if they want to
see their stored
data every 90 days, and to delete
data regularly.
Facebook users in the United States are scheduled in coming weeks to
see a series of new consent screens explaining how the company collects and uses personal
data and
asking permission for these uses.
Summary of the Robin Hood conference: Einhorn, Tepper, Druckenmiller etc [ValueWalk] Profile of Renaissance Technologies» secretive Medallion Fund [Bloomberg] Reflections on the Trump Presidency, after the election [Ray Dalio] How T. Boone Pickens sits tight in the riskiest of businesses [NYTimes] The next generation of hedge fund stars:
data - crunching computers [NYTimes] Treasury officials are warning hedge funds could create the next big crisis [Vox] Bill Ackman's 2016 fortune: down, but far from out [NYTimes] Omega's Einhorn
sees Trump's policies boosting stocks [Reuters] Tourbillon's Jason Karp says Trump will make stock pickers great again [Reuters] John Paulson got Trump elected and now has favor to
ask [Vanity Fair] Jim Chanos says Valeant was biggest loser ever for hedge funds [CNBC] Credit Suisse said raising $ 2 billion for hedge fund stakes [Bloomberg] Tyrian Investments to close [Reuters] Hedge fund strategies no longer correlated with equity returns [Investing] Female fund managers are a rarity across the globe [Morningstar] This is why alternatives are worth it [ValueWalk]
Ask employees and check out social media accounts, as well as the website, to
see just how open they are with
data, information and updates.
«We believe it is entirely possible that there will be a connection there,» Zuckerberg said when
asked if there was overlap between Cambridge Analytica's harvested user
data and the political propaganda pushed by the Kremlin - linked Internet Research Agency during the 2016 presidential election, which Facebook has said was
seen by some 126 million people.
U.S. Tightens Security for Economic
Data (NYT) • Investors» 10 Most Common Behavioral Biases (Above The Market) • Yahoo: the challenges facing new boss Marissa Mayer (BBC News) • With Low Supply,
Asking Prices Rise for Fifth Straight Month (WSJ) you know my views on this • Game Theory and Macroeconomics (Musings of the Sorts) • Government Spending and the Economy (Economix)
see also Why is it so hard to raise taxes on the rich?
The charismatic boss said T - Mobile's inspiration for
Data Stash was seeing 40,000 customers on Twitter asking their carriers to allow for data roll - o
Data Stash was
seeing 40,000 customers on Twitter
asking their carriers to allow for
data roll - o
data roll - over.
Ask Anonymous or another hacker group to
see if they can get the
data.
Depending on How, Who and When we Present,
Ask and Collect
data, it seems to fit neatly into to biased box containing the desired content of information which supports the view we wish the world to
see.
McCallie's team is not convinced, and has
asked to
see the FAA's test
data — which the agency has so far refused to make public, citing security concerns.
The main interface plots Kepler's
data on a chart and
asks the citizen scientist questions about what they
see, such as patterns or dips in light.
That's why when reporting on any ongoing unpublished work, competent journalists should be
asking some questions: Can we
see the
data?
I've emailed Dr Longo to
ask for the raw
data on death rates to
see what the absolute risk is.
metropolis — With tensions flying air mass makes you so choose, Cheap Patriots Jerseys Free Shipping Cheap Jerseys Borntrade San Francisco Giants Jersey Posey detroit red wings womens jerseys Cheap Steelers Super Bowl Jerseys and I
see I was
asked, did you do your enquiry on — successful the air unit with and talked with active two time period hopping trains, antitrust
datum the Lone - Star State fauna.
Courtney Couvreur at Oakland International High School does this by
asking her Statistics and Probability students to create a cookbook and, in the process, learn foundational numeracy skills about fractions, which will help them eventually interpret quantitative
data they
see in their everyday life.
You can
see authenticity in Seago's approach in the way she values validity and genuineness in
asking her students to carry out a specific experiment that yields
data appropriate to what it is the students are trying to identify.
Before this lesson,
ask students to create a
data - collection form that includes all the animals they've observed during their sit - spots or that they've
seen from home, marking the number of times each animal was
seen.
If, on the other hand, somebody has carried out an experiment himself or herself, analyzed the
data, made a prediction, and
saw whether it came out correctly, if somebody is doing history and actually does some interviewing himself or herself — oral histories — then reads the documents, listens to it, goes back and
asks further questions, writes up a paper — that's the kind of thing that's going to adhere.
Green ink is added to school books because teachers think that's what Ofsted wants to
see, lesson plans are reinvented every year because school leaders think that's what they should
ask for and schools find themselves collecting ever more
data, and even more frustratingly, sometimes the same
data in different formats for different people.
As a result of our campaign, the government and Ofsted have produced a video about some of the activity around marking,
data collection and lesson planning that Ofsted don't want to
see, and that your head should not
ask you for.
So it isn't exactly shocking to
see U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan's move yesterday to issue a letter to state school superintendents in waiver states
asking them to «incorporate, to a significant degree» more - accurate graduation rate
data as part of the hodgepodge of new accountability systems approved under the waiver gambit.
Observers collect hard
data, avoiding judgements, about what they
see to present to teachers and
ask them to craft their own approaches, with support and guidance, for improvement.
«As a result of the NEU's workload campaign, the government and Ofsted recently produced a video about some of the activity around marking,
data collection and lesson planning that Ofsted don't want to
see, and that heads should not
ask for.
«I'd like to
see a culture shift, so that when people
ask for
data, it isn't perceived as an attack,» Thongnopnua said.
Ask the seller for information from any
data plates and
see who did the coachwork?
During the Apple launch event this morning, it was clear to
see how easily this pairing could be used to benefit your health while helping researchers and healthcare professionals to gather more meaningful
data (
asking patients to recall pain levels days or weeks later during scheduled appointments can be difficult, whereas a ResearchKit app can capture
data or make users perform ongoing tasks that will provide useful details).
But for me to make a completely unbiased opinion, I feel a need to
see more complete
data, and so I'm simply
asking if it is available.
Definitely find the sub genre
data on romance helpful and wouldn't mind
seeing similar breakdowns for others — since you
asked.
I can't imagine waking up to
see your name and info splashed like that without being
asked, especially since
data guy is using web crawlers /
data scrappers to get to
data that is not out in public.
I will not buy 3G I don't trust ATT I sea what they are doing now with my iphone 3G
data charges and over
see use don't
ask
Underwriting uses either actuarial
data or crystal balls to
see into the future and predict risk and set pricing — which of the two they use will depend on whom you
ask.
They came and
saw what we needed and
asked for some backing
data, and they made their decision very quickly and got the money we needed quickly, too.»
So today, before we get to some actual
data, I thought I'd
ask when the last time you
saw one of these things happen was:
All Site content and collective work comprising the Site, including information, articles,
data, software, photographs, graphs, videos, typefaces, graphics, music, sounds, the «look and feel» and other artwork and material (collectively «Content») is protected by copyright, trademark, patent or other proprietary rights under United States and / or international laws and held by PetSmart Charities and / or the original creator of the Content, including PetSmart Charities's suppliers and / or affiliates and Site visitors contributing material in connection with our Pet Community, Blog,
Ask an Expert, and similar services (for more information,
see Contributions to this Site; Content and Submissions below).
Their site doesn't say where they are located, so you should
ask that too and
see if it matches the location
data on pictures.
I suppose that if Dr. Doe professes that titer tests are not accurate, one could
ask to
see the
data that leads him (or her) to this conclusion.»
It is pretty reasonable to
ask for a discount, but the most I could
see them doing is putting forth a twenty dollar discount on the digital version if you have the season pass and trophy
data of the original game or the purchase of the digital version.
I
asked on a previous thread whether anyone knew of a specific database suite that gave all of that functionality (versioning of binary
data, URL citeability of specific versions, forward citation to
see who used what etc.), but other than vague references, there wasn't anything concrete.
Along those lines, has the following been tried (again, forgive if I'm
asking something with an obvious answer published somewhere): 1) pick starting projection dates and subsequent run paths 2) example for (1): start 1980, run forward 5 years; start 1982, run forward 5 years; start 1984 (run to 1989) etc etc 3) at each start we proceed as with the 1979 directive; ie calibrate with several months of starting year
data 4) thus the latest such (example) run where we could compare against actual
data would be an initialization in 2008 and run forward for 5 years to 2013 5) the advantage of the above (and I recognize that there is a huge amount of work involved in crunching these simulations) is that we could
see the starting temp and 5 year projections against the historical record for a number of overlapping segments.
Mr. Revkin, I just use this as an open line, to
ask about another topic — I would like to
see some
data on how much human garbage, building material, etc., was washed into the Gulf during Ike.
That often worked for me, still does — people share pre-publication or unpublished / unpublishable
data that might cast light on some dark area, when they
see a somewhat intelligent question being
asked.
In a more conventional field, in which highly technical papers were published in professional journals rather than Nature or Science, the paper would be read by the few experts, who over the next few years would try to understand what it all means, whether it is really new, what the weaknesses might be, do their own analyses to
see how robust the results are, and
ask if there are conflicting
data sets.
WRT attempting to review the papers he's been
asked to review by means of
seeing supporting
data and methods.
«His most startling observation came when he was
asked how often scientists reviewing his papers for probity before publication
asked to
see details of his raw
data, methodology and computer codes.
I'll bet my house on little green Martians arriving and
asking to be taken to
see Chris Monckton before I'll expect any climate modellers to give a t ** s about observational
data.
In light of past deceptions by Climate Scientists - Climategate... I would want to
see the internal emails of how the scientist use the
data and any discussions internally to
see what if any there were doubts and debates... We are
asked to trust them blindly and as I said in the past, our government agencies have not been the most truthful or reliable.
The most startling observation came when he was
asked how often scientists reviewing his papers for probity before publication
asked to
see details of his raw
data, methodology and computer codes.
If you were
asked to peer review a paper, would YOU sign off on it without
seeing the
data that went into it or (usually) the program code that processed the
data?