Sentences with phrase «see any evidence about»

In this case, seeing evidence about how senior scientists have behaved and knowing that they had extremely successful careers while still navigating these complex career and personal decisions can help one think more carefully about the tradeoffs involved.»

I'd be interested to see evidence about whether students, governments and donors actually do make decisions among law schools on the basis of institutional narratives.

Not exact matches

All the evidence I've seen is consistent with the And model, though you have to think about it differently.

Do we see deeply quickly, or are we leaping to conclusions about people and ignoring evidence that contradicts our mental shorthand?

I saw hard - core evidence that John and Gloria were serious» about their intentions to change how they headed the company.

Get Specific About Foreign Subsidies: Though government activism isn't widely seen as effective in Republican circles, there's plenty of evidence that trade policy has at the very least boosted employment in countries like China and Korea.

In a telephone conversation with THR, he said about Paramount Pictures: «What we need to see is continued evidence of improvement.»

We expect that to happen again — particularly because the jury was prohibited from knowing about these court rulings in favor of Gawker, prohibited from seeing critical evidence gathered by the FBI and prohibited from hearing from the most important witness, Bubba Clem.

We've seen a lot of evidence about what's coming, through the HomePod firmware leak, and reports including one from Bloomberg this week that outlines exactly how the iPhone interface will work without a home button, but Apple should still have plenty to reveal that we haven't seen at this event, including at least a few amazing ARKit demos.

But if you have evidence to the contrary then let's see it — but please let's not hear about how many active funds underperform the index again!

There's quite a bit of evidence that Google looks for structure in your blog post — the more structure, the higher you rank (see this article by Yoast for more about text structure and SEO)

It's evidence time, and we are about to see the same old dance — either he is going to provide ridiculous unsupported gibberish, or he is going to vanish without a trace.

I saw where you think that you can argue about «fine - tuning» and strong principles, and I would assert that's because you don't even know what the most implicating evidence even is... thanks to your god, Copernicus.

Robert See, I find that anyone who denies what scientific evidence objectively reveals in favour of what they personally think must be correct without any evidence whatsoever must be operating out of the same harmful pride you're talking about.

I call BS on Jimbo about «a huge avalanche of historical evidence and archeology» and I call BS on your statement because you only refer to «common knowledge» I've seen what Christian common knowledge is like and it often runs a bit shy on facts..

And all of the discussion about political correctness, all of the evidence we see of internalized woman - hatred and gynophobic attitudes in women, clearly reveal that gynaffectionate feminist separatism, while loosening our bonds, does not remove all that is alienating.

All I see are a lot of believers making a lot of claims — often contradictory — unsupported by any evidence about God and his teachings.

About faith being the substance of things hoped for and for which the evidence is not seen?

They are playing tricks with your mind so you don't see or care about evidence like this so they plan horrible things behind the curtain while people get upset over conterceptives you can still get.

... no evidence it was, yet there it is... when you look at it, it in fact was not designed, but it was laid down over millions of years... a sedimentary rock... the rock was not designed... maybe the PROCESSES that made the rock were desined... not really... gravity makes water flow into the lowest ares and when the water moves more slowly, sediment is dropped, forming rock... Still not seeing a designer... what about water... simple chmistry there, designed?

As we have seen, the story about the women at the tomb, on the showing of the authors themselves, circumstantial as it is, remains inconclusive as evidence apart from further verification.

So the biblical experts say there is not enough evidence to make a determination, yet you, who has never seen the fragment, declares that it is talking about the church.

There is some dispute about that, but I see clear evidence that there's been a decline since the «60s of 20 or 25 percent in average church attendance.

Why on earth would a minister who had met me twice and could clearly see no evidence of the accuracy of those miserable stories which he «knew had to be true because he had heard the same consistent stories about me all these years?»

What about the scientific evidence favoring the Medjugorie visionaries who claim to see the Blessed Virgin Mary?

Some evidences of its coming we see about us in redeemed lives and in a better society; for others we must hopefully wait, labor, and pray.

The chances are very very very low, but when you apply the vast amounts of matter in the universe over the entire history of it all, and apply the fact that we have seen organic materials in comets and Saturns moons, not to mention the undeniable evidence that we are here talking about it, those numbers become very likely.

While I am not religious (I will call myself agnostic), and having an IQ well over genius levels, with scientific and mathematical tendencies, let me ask you a few questions, because what I see here are a bunch of people talking about «no evidence» or «proof» of God's existence, therefore He can't possibly exist, existential arguments, which are not arguments, but fearful, clouded alterations of a truth that can not be seen.

Simply because I exist on a Planet about a billion light years from any other currently living form of life, not chemicals, elements or gases, and how I don't see this as some random thing — there is something greater than you and I and the evidence is all around you.

You don't need nor will you ever see evidence for sure of that, but I believe that if you religious nut jobs knew anything about gods natural laws you would instinctively know that.

Although Darwin did not see any evidence for design in nature, we should keep in mind that any doubts Darwin may have had about religion were due to his reactions to the prevailing theology of providential design that dominated the culture of nineteenth - century Victorian England.

Yes, this was evidence that God also was upset about what this man named Jesus was teaching, and had seen fit to make Him a public spectacle in the sight of all so that nobody would ever again seek to challenge the teachings of the religious leaders or the traditions of the Jewish people.

When Jesus speaks about the drawing of the Father, Calvinists see this is as evidence of Unconditional Election.

No... I actually began questioning Christianity and all religions when I was in elementary school and in history class while learning about the greek gods and their myths thought «Well... let's see... these people really believed in these gods and those stories... thought they really happened... but there was no evidence they did and we all know they're not real now... so what's different between that and Christianity and other religions?»

I didn't see any evidence in article that the bishop knew about it back then — am I missing something?

The reasons are complex, but this seen is obvious to me: people are fed up with leaders and friends who talk learnedly and officiously about God but show little evidence of being interested in God.

How about those that don't because they haven't seen any evidence of it?

The evidence of this failure is everywhere to be seen, but almost nowhere recognized or talked about.

«NATRE are encouraged to see evidence that some OFSTED inspectors are again looking at RE / RS provision and outcomes in schools where there are concerns about the lack of GCSE entries.»

= > well good to see you understand that the odds of being right about the family are stacked against you based on your evidence and best tools available for testing.

What irked Macintosh was that Wieman talked about God as «the growth of meaning and value in the world» and saw no evidence pointing to God as a person; Wieman thought that Macintosh, though starting with empirical evidence, proceeded to interpret God in terms of human wishes rather than in terms of the facts.

Also, we have widely reported here on the incredible effects people are seeing in using coconut oil with dementia and Alzheimer's, but not even the Alzheimer's Association is researching about coconut oil, despite being presented with the evidence for it as far back 2007.

«The Australian Dietary Guidelines state that a small, 125mL glass of fruit juice with no added sugar consumed occasionally can count towards a serve of fruit2, so it's really positive to see robust evidence help inform Australians about their intake of core foods,» he said.

So I thought I would have a quick look at the evidence and see if there was support for what Mikel Arteta said to Arsenal Player about the Gunners seeming to be punished for every little mistake and not getting rewarded for the things we have done well.

I really do nt see any legs in any of these stories about any more transfers, The evidence is all there among all the smoke and mirrors, Look at the evidence, Wenger stated that Giroud would lead the line next season and as such we have have only seen any real movement towards buying a striker in the purchase of Asano who clearly is nothing more than a shirt selling move.

What really galls me is that Wenger gets paid 8 million a year to manage a side and yet even the lowest paid bin man who is an arsenal fan can see that OG and Theo are NOT nor will they EVER be up to scratch un yet Wenger persisits against all the evidence because he so desperately wants to prove the world wrong about either or both of the afore mentioned.

That let me see that even without any evidence at all, people believe just about anything reported on what's going on in the locker room.

I would most like to see you share your observations about the player you wished, how his qualities fit to our squad, and provide evidence on how said player can do a better job than another in the same role, so that everyone can debate on the same grounds.

arsenal don't work on their defense we all know that evidence was during the community shield when during a freekick I saw ozil marking ivanovic arsenal need atleast 3 players this window a cb like abdenour, cdm kyechowaik / bender & a striker else it will another season of disappointment not just that even the likes of ozil / sanchez may ponder about their future

I have seen no evidence that either of them participated in any kind of bad behavior, or even knew about any of the specific events, yet I have a hard time believing that neither of them had a sense that something was going on.